John C Stennis Novice Tournament

2025 — Starkville, MS/US

Extemporaneous Speaking

Abbreviation EXT
Format Speech
Entry Fee $0.00
Entry Limit Per School 10
Entry 1 competitors per entry

Event Description:

The tournament director will prepare a list of topics on current foreign and domestic issues. The student will draw three questions and return two before he/she begins his/her preparation period.

· The student will have thirty minutes of time to prepare his/her speech. There is a 30-second grace period. Students who exceed the time limit by more than 30 seconds should not be given first place in a panel.

· The student may use one note card with a maximum of fifty words on it.

· Laptop computers and tablet devices may be used by speakers during prep time, but may not be used to receive information for competitive advantage from non-competitors (coaches, assistant coaches, teammates, other students, etc.) inside or outside of the preparation room.

Criteria for judging:

ANALYSIS & CONTENT: Did the speaker analyze the topic adequately? Did the content show that the speaker has

adequate knowledge of the subject? Was the content relevant to the topic?

INTRODUCTION: Did the speaker get your attention and introduce the subject in an interesting manner? Did the introduction relate to the rest of the speech?

ORGANIZATION: Were the ideas carefully selected and set forth in the speech? Did the speaker preview the main points and develop them in the body of the speech?

SUPPORTING MATERIALS: Did the speaker have adequate support for his/her assertions? Was the evidence pertinent and logically set forth?

STYLE: Did the speaker exhibit command of informal conversational style rather than stilted or formal usage? Was the language communicative rather than “memorized”?

CONCLUSION: Was the conclusion concise? Was it well-motivated? Did it effectively tie the speech together?

ORAL PRESENTATION: Was the speaker’s speech devoid of dialectical errors, mannerisms, etc., that call attention to

themselves rather than communicate the ideas presented? Did the speaker’s bodily action contribute to his/her skill of communication?