Eugene Kim ParadigmLast changed 10/26 11:32P CDT
I am a relatively standard Varsity flow judge, but I'm also an activist judge. I'll be doing my own weighing/analysis during the round (without prior bias and in consideration of the information presented to me in the round, of course), especially if the round has poor weighing.
I won't dock speaking points based on minutiae (such as speaking speed or where you look in the round), but just make sure to keep your presentation reasonable based on standard PF guidelines.
I will, however, dock points if you're overly aggressive/arrogant/rude.
For Summary and FF I want to see a clear extension of any important cards/arguments/attacks/whatever and clear impactful taglines for voting issues, as those are the main speeches I'm voting off of. I also like it when debaters number their attacks clearly in the rebuttal.