Sofiya Andreyeva Paradigm

Last changed 5/9 11:38A EDT

Updated February 23rd, 2018

Hi! Congratulations on finding it all the way here. I'm glad you probably care at least a tiny bit about winning, but you're most likely going to have to do more than just the bare minimum of getting by to win in front of me.

I'm a former NYU debater and former president of the NYU policy team. My experience in policy debate has been 4 years of college debate, 3 years of which were open, and I'm coming up on 2 years of coaching now across college, high school, and currently middle school. I currently work for Success Academy Midtown West in New York City and I coach their middle school debate program full time.

As a debater, I did just about every form and style of debate (everything from 6 min of politics DAs in the block to performance args with narratives and/or poetry), but I honestly do not have a particular preference for arguments anywhere on the spectrum. As a judge, I view my role primarily as an evaluator of the arguments presented before me in the round. If you decide for whatever reason (consciously or unconsciously) that it's not in your best interest to frame the round for me, I'll default first to the flows and if you've messed those up too much, then my secondary default is to vote for the side that has done the best debating overall by some fun arbitrary standard I'll invent for you and if neither side did a particularly great job debating according to that standard, I'll vote for the side that bored me the least.

T: Yup, it’s a voting issue, and it's an a priori one so just go ahead and answer it however you want, but at least answer it. Counter-interps are probably definitely a good idea if you’re aff, but you can convince me otherwise if that's not the path you want to take in answering it. I'll gladly entertain any T arguments, but I expect a full warranted out standards and impact debate coming off the violation. Small tricky affs are small and tricky, so if T is your generic go to, take the time to explain how they untopical and why that has significance for the round don't just cry that they're unfair for 5 minutes because all that will do is just make me very sad and I'll be wishing that we were having a different debate than the one we're having.

Disads: Turns case arguments are great - do them. Note, I'm generally pretty generous with allowing links on DAs to affs until they're contested. Neg, be tight on your internal link story. If your explanation of the DA doesn't make sense to me, I'm not going to pull the trigger on it if the aff is winning a reasonable part of their case. Also, if it’s a particularly bad DA, aff’s don’t need evidence to answer it just their common sense.

Kritiks: I like these. I like these a lot. They're pretty neat and let you do a lot of fun tricks. However, to go for these, I think you need a clear explanation of how the K functions, and you still need to do impact calculus. There has to be at least one clear link articulated consistently from the block to the 2nr. If you don’t understand the K, I probably won’t understand your articulation of it either.

Framework: Specificity is important for the negative. Point out exactly how we should frame the debate, why that’s a good idea, and any in round abuse. Don’t neglect the line by line in these debates. Role of the ballot args are nice when they meet the following criteria: they're consistent, make sense, and are carried through the round.

Counterplans: These need to have a well-articulated net benefit. Other than that, anything goes.

I will typically not judge kick the CP or the K alt. Just do the basic work of kicking out of these if you're not going for one, never assume I'll do work for you that favors you.

Debate is supposed to be both fun and educational. Enjoy your round, and try to make it fun for everyone in the room.

I really enjoy clever jokes and entertaining CXs.

Full Judging Record

Tournament Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/11/2019 LD R2 NSU SS HuaXia Chinese AM Neg
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/11/2019 LD R1 HuaXia Chinese AX American Heritage Boca Delray EI Aff
SADL Middle School Tournament 7 4/27/2019 NOV Q SA Bronx 2 CO SA Ditmas Park AB Aff Aff on a 3-0
SADL Middle School Tournament 7 4/27/2019 NOV R1 SA Ditmas Park HJ SA Harlem North Central BoDa Aff
NYCUDL High School State Championship 4/6/2019 NPOL Octas Brooklyn Tech GW Mamaroneck OL Neg Neg on a 2-1
NYCUDL High School State Championship 4/6/2019 OPOL R4 Brooklyn Tech AM Mamaroneck KR Neg
NYCUDL High School State Championship 4/6/2019 OPOL R3 Mamaroneck JZ Leon Goldstein PC Neg
NYCUDL High School State Championship 4/6/2019 OPOL R1 Mamaroneck WS Leon Goldstein CK Aff
SADL Middle School Tournament 6 3/9/2019 JV R3 SA Hudson Yards Shinn & Fiorentino SA Harlem West Garza & Seck Aff
SADL Middle School Tournament 5 2/2/2019 NOV R1 SA Hudson Yards SV SA East Flatbush GT Aff
SADL Middle School Tournament 2 10/20/2018 NovPo R3 SA Bed-Stuy PS SA Harlem East GH Aff
SADL Middle School Tournament 2 10/20/2018 NovPo R2 SA Bronx 3 MR SA East Flatbush SS Neg
SADL Middle School Tournament 2 10/20/2018 OpenP R1 SA Bed-Stuy PS SA Harlem East ED Aff
SADL Policy Debate Final Invitational 2017 6/2/2018 OP R5 SA Harlem North Central DT SA Harlem West BT Aff
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R4 Asian Debate League WT Dr. Bessie Rhodes School of Global Studies GG Aff
SADL 2nd Middle School Debate Tournament 10/21/2017 NovPo R2 HY ST HW CL Aff
SADL 1st Middle School Debate Tournament Workshop 9/30/2017 OpenP R3 SA Bed-Stuy GP SA Bronx 2 PD Neg
SADL 1st Middle School Debate Tournament Workshop 9/30/2017 NovPo R2 SA Bed-Stuy FP SA Harlem NC DK Neg