Khamani Griffin Paradigm

Last changed 17 February 2021 12:38 PM PDT

Hello! I coach debate at Flintridge Prep and Westridge School.

I coach Parli, LD, Policy and Congress.

I competed in national circuit NPDA in college and I do a little Policy debate on occasion. I'm an African American studies / Comm major with a focus on colonialism and antiblackness and these studies influence the arguments I read and the discussions I have.

Please have fun, don't be rude, have the round you want.

this paradigm gets more specific as you go;

the first section is for prefs (ignore it if I'm in the PF pool, skip to the 2nd / 3rd section)

the second is just some specific debate stuff

the third is about sequencing and processing your arguments

email chain —-> KhamaniGCoaching@gmail.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Stuff for Strikes/Prefs:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

debates about debate / pre-fiat: truth > tech

debates about warrants and information / post-fiat: tech > truth

t/fw: will vote on it but I've been labelled a K hack

Nebel T: boy, I don't get this and I'm too afraid to ask questions now, so pls explain what an up-ward tailed test is or we will both be lost

Theory threshold: pretty low to vote on, probably won't vote on shoes but I've voted on ***5 RVIs to date ( ´_ゝ`)

Critical Non T Affs: I love these, I've even been inspired to write specific positions by 2 debaters I've judged so I guess there's your spillover warrant -- pls have your fw answers and i'm super down to learn some new stuff!

"debatably" T/NonT Affs: really big fan, win your stuff

Tricks: pls don't thx ~~

Cheater CPs: love a smart CP debate. give me the net ben to the cp

High Phil: pls strike me ; I genuinely do not enjoy the process of linking offense to a FW in which two things feel very similar and struggle to eval these debates unless there is a comparative advantage / cp / k format. I will judge them if I have to, but its a debate I don't enjoy.

Args like Warming good / Recession good / death good; if warming is good bc it’s great for that one species of phytoplankton, tell me why that phytoplankton is key in comparison to the climate conditions of others; i.e., incremental warming is what's happening now, incrementalism is good) Same for like death good; it's gotta be like "we need to reorient how we see death" otherwise, you're gonna be in for a rough time

K v K debates: probably my preferred debate, as long as you explain what's going on, I'm here to let you run your round and evaluate it how you want me to. These are really fun debates for me to become engaged in and one I love watching.

Case Debate / Turns: yee these are cool

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Specifics~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you have specific questions about literature bases I’ve read or are familiar with; just send me an email and I’ll get back to you. If not, ask before the round and I’ll answer or just read it and explain it to me; so read the whole thing if you can, otherwise scan for the bold text for the “Reading My Paradigm during Prep Time,” version.

  1. I have a very low threshold on Theory. I’m likely to vote on potential abuse, but if it’s looking like you’re gonna go all in on T, proven abuse is probably the safer route. This means I love clash and will support it, however, if you make me vote on “must provide a written copy of the plantext,” (which I’m a huge fan of, by the way) unique standards will put you ahead. ———I default to reasonability on T but can be persuaded otherwise. So, please say otherwise and you won’t have a problem. ;)——I will not pick up your RVI on T. Sorry. Forcing the judge to vote for the AFF Bc they were topical isn’t a threshold I'd prefer to cross but warranted RVIs or ones you can justify, I'm pretty receptive to. ——- also, if you’re deliberately spreading someone out of a round, I’ll probably pick up their speed procedural, Golden turn, criticism, whatever. Bc I think that’s not cool. Inclusivity and access are important. If it’s egregious, I’ll drop you on sight. If both sides are spreading against my threshold for speed and I yell clear several times, I’ll either 1) drop the team that did it first or 2) presume Neg.
  2. I love the K debate. FW, Thesis (pls, like even if it’s quick just give me the breakdown), Links, Alt, Alt solvency. I’m receptive to framework, so if you’re answering framework pls don’t just tell me to crossapply things w/o giving me an explanation of how things work first. (Then say it :)) I dabbled in afropess, afrofuturism, cruel opt, performance. Just bc I read them doesn't mean ill backfill for your args, I still expect you to explain the context of how your args interact with the args // scenarios presented.
  3. Real big fans of Case debates and seeing people go for case negs in the 1nc is really compelling to watch.
  4. I love good clash from the Neg but I’m a sucker for PICs. It's just a fun debate to have. Pic teams should know how to defend their strat choices.
  5. I think turns are very underused, while also being very under-explained as to how they function in the debate space. Pls read uniqueness the other way and provide some analysis / warrant that proves that to be bidirectional, and if you can win your turns, I’ll vote on them. This is pretty specific to PF, as I've noticed teams will make turns on arguments and win them and not go for those turns or even interact with them, or teams will let people concede turns and not point out the offense on that sheet.
  6. There’s a really good chance I may have to intervene if you don’t tell me what I’m voting for in rebuttals - Parli x Policy x LD / summary or final focus (PF). Please collapse. I can't stress this enough. make a choice. Weigh your impact, prove the link to the impact and weigh that against their impacts. P L E A S E. smart concessions also are important. You don't need to win every single argument in the debate. But, tell me why the ones you're choosing to go for matter.
  7. Your rebuttal should write my RFD. Tell me about what impact scenario beats the other team’s. Give me framing and calculus. PLEASE. Whether it be the theory level or the link level or thesis level or alt solvency, whatever. Why are you winning this round? If you’re right, you’ll know it.
  8. Collapse. Don't go for every piece of offense in the debate; you're not winning all of it. Prioritize and weigh your way out. Which weigh? yeah dat way.
  9. Pls don’t make me judgekick a plan or theory shell. Tell me what to do with it, Bc you’ll be mad if I don’t vote on it. If you make a shadow extension from something said earlier that’s chill. In PF, I will not vote on things said in case that do not get extended in summary. Meaning, your debate may technically feel like it starts in Summary. That's fine.
  10. I process information visually and will keep as tight of a flow as possible, but 1 of 2 things happen; (a) ill catch a cite and miss part of the tag bc I’m struggling to spell the cite w/o prompts on how it’s spelled (b) I’m struggling to hear you and am looking very confused. Looking for ways you can help me? Great! a) resummarize a particular point in your own words; especially if you feel like the decision is gonna come down to that anyway, just so I have some version of it. b) don't just say your __ evidence covers this; it happens, we all do it, but it's difficult if I'm assuming I know what you're referring to, and am not certain.
  11. Pls be friendly. (We’ve All had to debate someone that we’ve had beef with and even if it gets rough, pls try to be civil with each other.) But on another note, I like a sassy debate but I love seeing two close friends hash out a tough round. That means pls be respectful. If you’re a guy shouting down a girl in cross ex Bc you think it’s “dominating” or any other form of machismo,” to put someone else down, I will tank your speaks and have a hard time voting for you and will drop you. Ask for pronouns, names, whatever. Also time yourself. I should be able to trust y'all.
  12. I’m a process flower; I unfortunately don’t have the ability to write what I hear as I hear it, but I will listen harder than anyone else in the room to appear to have the most neurotypical flow and write my brains processing of what you’ve said. This doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy a fast debate or faster than normal or conversational or speech docs. As I’m expressive, you’ll learn exactly where you need to be, by my reactions. If I’m looking very confused and not writing, I have no idea what your offense is. If I’m confused and writing, I’m probably not sure where this is going, but I’m definitely following. If I’m smiling at you and nodding, It’s probably bc I’m enjoying your argument and your stylistic choices. If I’m staring at you and nodding with a tense face, it’s probably bc I’ve flowed your argument and understand it and am waiting for more offense or framing or weighing or for you to move on to the next argument.
  13. I’m super down to have a faster than normal debate. But I’m gonna ask that you slow for tags, send me a copy, and give a little pen time. (KhamaniGCoaching@gmail.com) That’s fine with me. Couple things tho, if I don’t have a copy of it in front of me and you’re full on spreading, I’m gonna miss things. I promise it. You can move fast, and if I were you, I’d watch me Bc I’m VERY FACIALLY EXPRESSIVE. You’ll know if I need you to slow a little.
  14. Partner to Partner comm is fine. Your partner is there. Team effort. Pls don’t control your partners speech time, nor will I flow what they say, you gotta say it. But yeah do your thing.
  15. Have fun and feel free to ask me any questions about things I should be comfortable with in your round, Bc remember, it’s your round. Break a leg.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~how I process information and weigh arguments and sequence them on my ballot ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

· I try to find the simplest ballot story - that means I will sequence argument evaluation as I deem appropriate. I believe lengthy ballot stories are more likely to be wrong, so I err heavily towards simple decisions. in practice, this means ignoring as much of the flow as is justified.

· I don't think argument interaction has to be explicitly flagged if it's clear that there is a contestation about truths. for example, if your thesis is "the sky does not exist", I would consider that to refute "the sky is blue". That being said, pls feel free to make my life easier by flagging things if you really want to make sure I don’t miss it or prioritize it.

  • I evaluate kritiks with impact framing contextualized to the entire round, in particular the other side's impacts, whether that's through a role of the ballot, prior question framing, root cause claims, or meta-ethics etc. however, the impact framing must be interacted sufficiently with the relevant impacts on the flow, or it often ends up being a clunker that doesn't help me evaluate the round.

· If your argument is warranted such that I can explain why your argument is true and / or has the implication you say it does, I am willing to vote for it. if your argument doesn't make sense to me, I’m limited in my ability to vote for it. here are two examples:

o (1) if you didn't read a solvency mechanism on your advantage, and the other team states you don’t have a solvency mech, it becomes pretty irrelevant whether or not your uniqueness and impacts flow through because you functionally don't have a solvency mechanism.

o (2) even if you extend an argument that is cold conceded, 1) I need an impact that outweighs or comes before the more clash-oriented debate 2) I won't vote for it if I don't understand it. to be clear, there is a difference between my not understanding an argument because it lacks a logical step versus not understanding something because I lack some knowledge (about the world, about your literature, etc.). in the latter case, I will default to what you say as being true. in the former, I will not.

· I try to presume I know nothing but I’m not a tab judge. it's impossible for me to not use knowledge from outside the round - all rounds assume a common basis of knowledge e.g. that people stay dead once they die (vs reincarnation). here are two independently sufficient brightlines - if you contest something about the world which I have assumed, I will drop that assumption- skep triggers are the best example of this ("knowledge is impossible" -> ill need the application that bc knowledge is impossible, we must ___ or whatever your preferred framing is) ; I will also not rely on outside knowledge if the other team flags the lack of explanation and reads at least a counter-claim - e.g. "you haven't explained why nuclear war causes extinction, global fallout is only temporary"

· I have a moderately high threshold for requiring warrants. generally, all claims should have warrants - empirics, analytics, or testimonies qualify, and are considered stronger to weaker in that order. this is a deeply rooted paradigmatic view which can be adjusted, but only through truly persuasive arguments

· Uncontested claims are possibly true (nonzero). however, pointing out that an argument has no warrant is sufficient for terminal defense on that claim if you read a competing claim, because both claims would have equal strength of link based on the warrant which means I can't evaluate them. terminal defense just needs to establish zero comparative risk, not absolute risk

Edit log Starting as of 10/12/19:

- organizing specific parts of the paradigm (nothing evaluative) - 10/12/19

- Edit to traditional / philosophy section and K Aff section and organization to *attempt* to make this cleaner and not 6+ pages of my rambling - 2/17/20

- the pandemic broke me and I eval significantly different than I used to -- 2/17/21 (hey look a year from the date, shouts to berkeley for always reframing how I see debate)

Full Judging Record

Tournament Lv Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2021-06-07 CX R10 146 153 Neg Neg 2-1
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2021-06-07 CX R9 136 277 Aff Aff 3-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2021-06-07 CX R8 171 191 Neg Neg 2-1
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2021-06-07 CX R7 239 259 Neg Neg 2-1
Big Wave Daves Birthday Bash Extravaganza HS 2021-04-17 WSDC R4 New Jersey BST Claremont HAW Opp
Big Wave Daves Birthday Bash Extravaganza HS 2021-04-17 WSDC R1 Claremont GLMP New Jersey BST Opp
Capitol Valley District Tournament HS 2021-04-02 CX R3 Folsom Rachapudi & Narasingu Mira Loma Cotrutsa & Bertrand Neg Neg 2-1
CSUF Bruschke Invitational HS 2021-03-13 M LD Quar La Reina SF Nova 42 NJ Neg Neg 3-0
CSUF Bruschke Invitational HS 2021-03-13 O LD R1 Honor EK Nova 42 RS Aff
East Los Angeles District Tournament HS 2021-02-20 CX R4 100 152 Aff Aff 3-0
East Los Angeles District Tournament HS 2021-02-20 LD R4 102 191 Neg Aff 2-1
East Los Angeles District Tournament HS 2021-02-20 LD R3 187 150 Neg
East Los Angeles District Tournament HS 2021-02-20 LD R1 190 156 Aff
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2021-02-13 VLD R6 Advanced Technologies AA Brentwood JK Aff
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2021-02-13 VLD R4 Unionville MP Brentwood JC Aff
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2021-02-13 VLD R4 Brentwood MM North Hollywood JL Aff
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2021-02-13 VLD R2 Loyola AC Sequoia AS Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF Octas Blake PR Hawken WaMa Con Con 2-1
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF R5 Ravenwood MB William Fremd CZ Con
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF R4 Westlake BL Plano West BS Pro
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF R3 NSU FR Nova RG Con
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF R2 Interlake CW Lansing TY Pro
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF R1 Montgomery Blair GC Blake KZ Pro
Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2020-10-17 O PF Final Redlands DD Los Osos NN Con Pro 2-1
Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2020-10-17 N Par Semi Crescenta Valley HM Newbury Park PF Opp Govt 2-1
Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2020-10-17 Parli R5 Claremont BC Crescenta Valley ER Opp
Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2020-10-17 O PF R4 Golden State SL Claremont BB Con
Bargain Belt Invitational MS 2020-10-17 Parli R3 New Roads AM ModernBrain GW Govt
Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2020-10-17 N PF R2 Stratagem Learning ZL Beverly Hills PL Con
Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2020-10-17 Parli R1 Los Altos LL Redlands HH Opp
Yale University Invitational HS 2020-10-01 VLD Double Harrison GC Lexington MB Neg Neg 2-1
Yale University Invitational HS 2020-10-01 VLD R5 Lexington NJ Bergen County Academies AK Neg
Yale University Invitational HS 2020-10-01 VLD R4 Byram Hills SH Strake Jesuit ZD Neg
Yale University Invitational HS 2020-10-01 VLD R3 Lake Nona AP Evanston Twp GK Neg
Yale University Invitational HS 2020-10-01 VLD R2 Brecksville Broadview Hts AY St Michael Albertville CS Neg
Yale University Invitational HS 2020-10-01 VLD R1 Northland Christian LB William G. Enloe AR Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 Parli Quar Nueva JC New Roads HC Aff Neg 2-1
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 Parli Octo Claremont RW Nueva TK Neg Neg 2-1
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 Parli Dubs Nueva JC Valencia BT Aff Aff 2-1
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 Parli R5 Bishop O'Dowd LE Valencia UL Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 Parli R5 Irvington AB Claremont HT Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 Parli R2 Northwood LZ University WY Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 Parli R2 Bentley BL Menlo-Atherton RM Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 Parli R1 Sierra Canyon WR Bentley WB Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 Parli R1 Dougherty Valley AZ New Roads WC Aff
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 CX R11 X236 X111 Aff Aff 3-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 CX R6 X191 X224 Neg
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 CX R5 X174 X239 Neg
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 CX R4 X203 X114 Neg Neg 2-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 CX R3 X161 X286 Neg Neg 2-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 CX R2 X113 X263 Neg Neg 2-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 CX R1 X165 X133 Aff Aff 2-0
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2020-02-15 VLD R6 Bellarmine KS Brentwood JC Neg
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2020-02-15 VLD R6 Harker AK Archbishop Mitty PK Neg
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2020-02-15 VLD R4 Brentwood HT Northland Christian ABr Neg
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2020-02-15 VLD R3 Cypress Bay IM Northwood HS Neg
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2020-02-15 VLD R2 Northland Christian LB Ferris TR Aff
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2020-02-15 VLD R1 Lynbrook YM Sequoia AS Aff
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2020-02-15 VLD R1 Northland Christian AB Ferris ML Aff
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2020-01-10 VPF OF Durham HL Coronado BS Con Con 3-0
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2020-01-10 NPF R5 BASIS Scottsdale EL West Career And Technical DT Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2020-01-10 VPF R4 Layton PG Advanced Technologies LI Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2020-01-10 VPF R4 West Career And Technical RB Gresham-Barlow EW Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2020-01-10 VPF R3 Westmont HC Belvidere North KW Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2020-01-10 VPF R3 Copper Hills FR Oakwood North Hollywood CW Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2020-01-10 VPF R2 Leland WZ Riverside STEM GaLi Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2020-01-10 VPF R2 Del Norte Independent BP Mission San Jose TS Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2020-01-10 VPF R1 Strake Jesuit CW Gunn BZ Pro
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2020-01-10 VPF R1 Durham HL BASIS Peoria SS Pro
Chuck Ballingall Memorial Invitational at Damien High School HS 2019-11-09 N PF R3 Honor Jenna Lea & Sam Semcheshen Riverside STEM Patricia Moon & John Fielder Aff
Claremont Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2019-10-12 Parli Final Claremont AT New Roads GG Aff Aff 3-0
Claremont Bargain Belt Invitational MS 2019-10-12 O PF R4 Jeffrey Trail AS Fairmont Prep RG Neg
Claremont Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2019-10-12 N PF R3 Sage Hill SL San Marino KJ Aff
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2019-09-21 Parli Final Dougherty Valley WF West Ranch AF Neg Neg 3-0
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2019-09-21 Parli Semi New Roads WW Dougherty Valley WF Neg Neg 3-0
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2019-09-21 Parli Quar Cleveland GH West Ranch AF Neg Neg 3-0
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2019-09-21 Parli Octo Valley International Prep HC Global Prep MB Aff Aff 3-0
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2019-09-21 TOCLD R6 Nova 42 EC Claremont GK Neg
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2019-09-21 TOCLD R5 Classical RP Palos Verdes Independent KV Aff
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2019-09-21 TOCLD R5 Canyon Crest EP Nova 42 NC Aff
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2019-09-21 TOCLD R4 Bay Independent MS Yerba Buena JG Aff
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2019-09-21 TOCLD R3 Bellarmine EG Lynbrook SM Aff
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VPF Trips Ridge KW Edina ZM Con Con 2-1
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 JVPF R5 Nightingale Bamford JK Richard Montgomery WX Con
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 JVPF R5 Hunter MS Potomac WZ Con
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 JVPF R3 Newton South TC Poly Prep Country Day ST Con
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 JVPF R3 Chaminade ST Lincoln-Sudbury KB Pro
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VPF R1 Lincoln-Sudbury KO Stow-Munroe Falls MK Pro
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VPF R1 Cosby SM Chaminade MV Pro
NPDL Tournament of Champions HS 2019-04-06 Parli Semi Los Altos/Campolindo Lee & Stankus Campolindo Bonet & Yuan Neg Neg 5-0
NPDL Tournament of Champions HS 2019-04-06 Parli R7 Los Altos/Bellarmine College Prep Asar & DiMartino Archbishop Mitty Sutaria & Patel Aff
NPDL Tournament of Champions HS 2019-04-06 Parli R5 Menlo-Atherton Ikonomou & Gordan Lakeridge Augst & Fennell Aff Aff 2-0
NPDL Tournament of Champions HS 2019-04-06 Parli R4 Campolindo Visht & Belinsky Archbishop Mitty Telebrico & Killedar Aff
NPDL Tournament of Champions HS 2019-04-06 Parli R3 Evergreen Valley Independent Dadbhawala & Guggilla Cupertino Independent Xiong & Du Aff Aff 2-0
NPDL Tournament of Champions HS 2019-04-06 Parli R1 Cleveland Glasheen & Baird Nueva Xu & Shahar Neg Neg 2-0
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF Double Archbishop Mitty KV Saratoga CS Pro Pro 3-0
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF Triple Archbishop Mitty BP Mission San Jose DaDa Con Con 2-1
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF Triple Dougherty Valley NL Nueva CS Con Con 2-1
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF R5 Fremont Christian NW Mission San Jose MC Con
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF R4 Oakwood School - North Hollywood GW St Francis GL Con
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF R3 Cherry Creek AC Oakwood School - North Hollywood LS Con
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF R3 Tahoma Senior CB Lynbrook AA Pro
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF R2 Cypress Bay MS Taipei American TL Pro
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF R2 Cypress Bay NS Archbishop Mitty BP Pro
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF R1 Interlake LV Mission San Jose WF Pro
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2019-02-16 VPF R1 Rowland Hall ZD Mission San Jose DS Pro
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2019-01-04 VLD 3x San Marino VL Park City AO Aff Aff 3-0
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2019-01-04 VLD R5 Tucson BW Torrey Pines WP Neg
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2019-01-04 VLD R5 BASIS Mesa AC Palo Alto EH Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2018-09-22 Parli Final Ashland LD Archbishop Mitty VM Aff Aff 3-0
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2018-09-22 Parli Semi Ashland LD Troy SP Aff Aff 3-0
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2018-09-22 O PF Octo La Salle DH Archbishop Mitty KV Neg Neg 2-1
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2018-09-22 Parli R5 La Costa Canyon GP La Reina BM Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2018-09-22 Parli R2 Archbishop Mitty TK Westridge CB Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2018-09-22 Parli R2 Valley International Prep CM La Costa Canyon MB Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2018-09-22 Parli R1 Delta Charter JR Claremont WR Neg
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF OF College Prep BW Dougherty Valley KJ Con Con 2-1
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF OF Corona Del Sol FJ Fairmont Prep KH Con Pro 2-1
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF 2x Harker LX Mission San Jose MK Pro Con 2-1
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF 2x Brophy CP SK College Prep PW Con Con 3-0
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF 3x Brophy CP SK Mission San Jose CM Con Pro 2-1
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF 3x College Prep PW Brophy CP HR Pro Pro 3-0
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 NPF R5 BASIS Scottsdale AV Clark KS Pro
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 NPF R5 Hamilton PS BASIS Scottsdale RY Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF R4 Quarry Lane PA Hamilton KS Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF R4 Foothill HL Fairmont Prep KR Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF R2 Nueva KM Palo Verde KM Pro
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF R2 Coral Academy Of Science Las Vegas DF Fairmont Prep AB Con
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF R1 Brophy CP SK Riverside STEM GS Pro
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational HS 2018-01-05 VPF R1 American Heritage HS - Plantation GK Hamilton VS Pro
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2017-09-30 N LD R6 Brentwood MF Granada Hills MJ Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2017-09-30 N LD R6 Loyola VC Brentwood SH Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2017-09-30 N LD R5 Marlborough ST Oak Park KM Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2017-09-30 N LD R5 La Costa Canyon OS Harvard-Westlake KD Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2017-09-30 N LD R4 Loyola AS Granada Hills AS Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2017-09-30 N LD R4 Oak Park BB Loyola SA Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2017-09-30 N LD R2 Loyola SN St Paul JL Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2017-09-30 N LD R2 Meadows NS Loyola PO Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2017-09-30 N LD R1 Oaks Christian AH Meadows CA Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2017-09-30 N LD R1 Oak Park HH Harvard-Westlake AH Neg
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2016-12-09 LD Double San Marino AL Carlsbad EB Neg Neg 3-0
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2016-12-09 LD R6 Canyon Crest NZ Carlsbad MK Aff
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2016-12-09 LD R5 San Marino KW Carlsbad HO Aff
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2016-12-09 LD R4 Canyon Crest EL Carlsbad EB Aff
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2016-12-09 LD R3 Chaminade CC San Marino AL Neg
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2016-12-09 LD R3 El Cerrito EG Torrey Pines SH Neg
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2016-12-09 Parli R1 Carlsbad PS Rancho Bernardo CS Aff