Alexandra Green Paradigm

Last changed 10/9 4:58P EDT

Yes, please, to the email chain: greenalexandra7@gmail.com
Former Varsity Debater at Liberty University - 2N

~ DO YOU - seriously. If you have to adjust your style to debate in front of me, that implicates a very real and very large problem within the debate community. I was taught by a pretty large squad with a variety of debate backgrounds and I will genuinely attempt to vote off the flow.

~ Tech over truth but framing influences tech. You can win line by line and absolutely take the L on a poorly handled framing argument that a good 2N/2A cross-applies in their final speech. K teams, the best tech is truth - there's nothing harder to beat than a K team with a plethora of examples.

~ Organization and explanation are key. Warrants, warrants, warrants. Keep the flows neat and it's easier for me to vote. Don't go for too many links.

~ Evidence matters -particularly between two policy teams. But a strong, unanswered, warranted analysis can, like I said, flip the ballot. At the end of the debate, if the embedded clash is strong, I'll err on the side of whoever reads the best (most recent and most detailed) piece of evidence for that argument.

~ Speed-Reading is Fine - final speeches should be a combination of both big picture at the top/bottom and line by line

~ Extensions - Shallow extensions like "Extend my case from the last speech" are not extensions. If you want me to evaluate it, explain it. If it goes conceded, do a light explanation of why it takes out/comes before the NEG's arguments. All arguments need to be claim + warrant + impact. That includes extensions.

Policy:

-
Things I love: a good counterplan, a strong case debate, a clear DA, small and technical 1ACs, impact turns.

- On the aff, I always read small, technical affirmatives so I'm perfectly fine with your questionably-topical 1AC. Just be ready to defend it.

- If you read more than 3 conditional advocacies, it's probably easier to persuade me you're doing something abusive than in other rounds. I'm pretty neutral in terms of how I view theory - if you do something "abusive" but can defend it on the line by line than you do you (especially with PICS).

- 2AR framing should explain to me why my ballot starts with the AFF's impacts then go from there.

Versus K Teams

- If you're going for the perm, go for the perm. (You should also almost always go for the perm)

- "Util outweighs" is not an argument. Give me warrants and contextualization. You can't just win your aff you also have to beat the K. Best place to start is the Alternative debate.

- I ran and will vote on Framework but I am not emotionally attached to framework as an argument. If you don't explain to me why framework is a pre-req to the knowledge production of the round you will lose. If you don't engage the affirmative, you will lose. Framework is best won when coupled with an intense case debate - do your research.

K:

On the AFF:

- go for the impact turns versus framework. "We meet" might be a fair, even true, argument but 9/10 times the impact turn is harder to beat and more persuasive.

- fairness makes the most sense to me as an internal link to education. That being said, you should explain how every facet of the debate space ties back to how and what we learn - this is the strength of the K.

- Great K teams beat policy teams on the framing and drop that framing down into the tech in the rebuttals. Framing is how I interpret the flow - you should do that line by line reinterpretation for me through the lens of the K.

- Against a K, go for exclusion arguments against the alternative as a justification for the permutation. Perm you do you, we do us.

On the neg:

- Most K teams I have debated/judged aren't the best at convincing me not to weigh the aff. I don't even think you have to win "don't weigh the aff" so much as "this is how you weigh the aff." That's the framing debate and should be prioritized.

- Ontology arguments are most persuasive to me when coupled with an abundance of historical examples. Truth is the best tech.

- The more particular the links, the better. The specifics of how the aff makes x link worse should be fleshed-out thoroughly in the block.

- Treat the perm like a counterplan - explain what solvency deficits it has, what the impacts to those solvency deficits are, and try to garner external offense to the permutation.

- I'm an English major who spends most of my time reading, writing, and researching critical theory. That being said, I find myself genuinely irritated when debaters attempt to mash together authors who would fundamentally disagree on how the world and violence operates. If you know the backgrounds of theorists and theories well enough, you can absolutely hash that out on the perm debate as a reason why the AFF doesn't capture the alternative.

CX: it's binding and I'll flow it/pay aggressive attention to it. CX is my favorite speech - take advantage of it and save time.

Speaks:

1. I will absolutely raise your speaks if you make me laugh. Sidenote: I love bad puns.

2. Lower your speaks with: card clipping, stealing prep, being racist, sexist, ableist, or overtly offensive in rhetoric or actions, making CX a shouting match.

Full Judging Record

Tournament Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
Liberty University 1/24/2020 Open Quarte Navy GR Pittsburgh LR Neg Neg on a 2-1
Liberty University 1/24/2020 Open Octos George Mason JS Navy GR Neg Neg on a 3-0
Liberty University 1/24/2020 Open R4 George Mason DS Pittsburgh LR Neg
Liberty University 1/24/2020 Novice R3 George Mason GH United States Military PT Aff
Liberty University 1/24/2020 Novice R1 George Mason BB United States Military BH Aff
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR RD 7 UC Berkeley EE Louisville BL Aff
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR RD 6 UT San Antonio HW Georgetown/Harvard RG Neg
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR RD 4 Oklahoma RW Mary Washington CH Aff
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR RD 2 Baylor GW Cornell SV Neg
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR RD 1 Concordia HP UC Berkeley BW Neg
George Mason Debate Tournament College 11/8/2019 Open Quarte Miami HL George Mason BM Aff Aff on a 2-1
George Mason Debate Tournament College 11/8/2019 Nov Octas James Madison SW George Mason PP Neg Neg on a 3-0
George Mason Debate Tournament College 11/8/2019 Nov R6 George Mason BI James Madison SW Neg
George Mason Debate Tournament College 11/8/2019 Nov R5 George Mason HS James Madison HD Aff
George Mason Debate Tournament College 11/8/2019 Open R4 James Madison HS Georgetown CR Aff
George Mason Debate Tournament College 11/8/2019 Open R3 Navy GR Mary Washington CH Neg
George Mason Debate Tournament College 11/8/2019 JV R2 Florida MR George Mason TB Neg
George Mason Debate Tournament College 11/8/2019 Nov R1 James Madison AS George Mason BG Neg
JV Novice Nationals at West Virginia University 3/2/2019 Nov R6 Houston DW Rochester CB Aff
JV Novice Nationals at West Virginia University 3/2/2019 Nov R2 George Mason DS United States Military AL Aff
JV Novice Nationals at West Virginia University 3/2/2019 Nov R1 George Mason BM NewSchool MW Aff
Northeast Regional Championship and D8 Qualifier GothamNYC 2/23/2019 Nov Quarte United States Military AB Cornell BS Neg Neg on a 3-0
Northeast Regional Championship and D8 Qualifier GothamNYC 2/23/2019 JV F Rutgers-Newark KL Boston College WV Aff Aff on a 3-0
Northeast Regional Championship and D8 Qualifier GothamNYC 2/23/2019 JV R6 NYU LY Cornell KS Aff
Northeast Regional Championship and D8 Qualifier GothamNYC 2/23/2019 Nov R5 Cornell GW Monmouth WC Neg
Northeast Regional Championship and D8 Qualifier GothamNYC 2/23/2019 Nov R4 Cornell SS Monmouth CoSh Aff
Northeast Regional Championship and D8 Qualifier GothamNYC 2/23/2019 JV R1 Monmouth PM Rutgers-Newark BK Neg
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX BO-Q Dr. Bessie Rhodes School of Global Studies GT SA Bronx 2 OL Aff Aff on a 2-1
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R5 SA Midtown West AH SA Harlem North Central DD Aff
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R4 SA Ditmas Park AD SA Bronx 2 DP Aff
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R2 SA Bronx 2 BM Dr. Bessie Rhodes School of Global Studies GG Neg
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R1 SA Harlem West BT Dr. Bessie Rhodes School of Global Studies GT Neg
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 GPF R7 Strake Jesuit College Prep WH Evanston Twp KW Aff
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 GPF R6 Lake Highland Prep KO Altamont CZ Neg
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 SPF R5 Archbishop Mitty GN NSU ML Neg
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 SPF R5 Montville LP BASIS Peoria RP Aff
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 GPF R4 Millburn CZ Quarry Lane AS Neg
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 GPF R3 Charles W Flanagan MS Ridge LR Aff
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 GPF R3 Coronado CA Durham DK Neg
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 SPF R2 Fairmont Prep AB Mission San Jose KZ Neg
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 SPF R2 Trinity Prep RH Royse City MP Aff
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 GPF R1 Mission San Jose MK Theodore Roosevelt CA Aff
VHSL Region 5C Debate Tournament 3/17/2018 LD -3 RocRid MV ThoJef PM Neg
VHSL Region 5C Debate Tournament 3/17/2018 LD -1 RocRid HK BroRun MD Neg
VHSL Region 5C Debate Tournament 3/17/2018 LD -1 StoBri YC RocRid AK Neg
WACFL Policy5 PF5 2/10/2018 PD-JV JV-3 Broad Run MV Chantilly MC Neg
WACFL Policy5 PF5 2/10/2018 PD-JV JV-2 Oakton MyKa Chantilly MK Aff
WACFL Policy5 PF5 2/10/2018 PD-JV JV-1 Broad Run TK Thomas Jefferson SS Neg