Alex Landrum Paradigm

Last changed 26 October 2019 8:51 AM CDT

Pronouns: He/him she/her

I don't particularly care what pronouns you use, I'm mostly he/him or she/her. But this is a PSA you MUST respect pronouns. There is a difference between accident and intent

Affiliation: Wylie HS '18

Rutgers-Newark 22'

Contact: landrum.alex42@gmail.com

Experience: Wylie HS 15-18 – tfa circuit hs debate for 3 years.

Rutgers Newark – 2nd year debating NDT/CEDA policy for Rutgers

***TL;DR***

"When I understand the words you say I take them more seriously

Do what you want. I follow tournament rules, try not to throw things"

-Michael Antonucci

Don't be a bigot, you'll lose. If both of teams are bigots, I'll flip a coin

I also love Sion Bell's paradigm and almost all of it holds true so if you're into it check that out

***Full Paradigm***

I'm skeptical of the utility of these things since it seems that no one listens to these anyway. But here we are

I will do my best to evaluate the round exactly as presented to me while leaving my personal opinions about arguments and ideas out of the RFD. However, for those of you who want to know, I do have some specific thoughts on certain matters. This is not to say that you should take me paradigm as gospel though. I try to keep an open mind and will listen to most arguments and strategies. That being said... you do you. There's a reason I continue to edit this page.

I may ask to see evidence after the round if it is a legitimate point of tension in the round but other than that, if I have to look at evidence to evaluate the debate you're making me do too much work.

Arguments:

Preface - I've run everything from politics, to afropess. My preference when I debate leans heavily critical, but I've run and judged strict policy strats too. I can judge whatever you want to throw at me and despite my personal argument choices I am just as happy to judge a good DA/CP as I am to judge a K v. K debate. This being said, don’t feel like its necessary to read the k just because I like it or it’s my specialty. I’d rather you do what you’re good at

K affs/nontraditional affs- Affs should probably defend something although my interpretation of "something" is flexible. I'm good for these affs but the explanation of these arguments are important since I'm not omniscient.

I’ve spent most of my time and had most of my success with these kinds of affs but I’ve come to believe that most of these affs don’t do anything. This isn’t generally a problem except when I’ve judged these debates on the HS level most people can’t actually explain what these aff’s do (or don’t) and end up just explaining some theory of power. And neg teams just let these teams get away with doing nothing without forcing them to defend that.

K - I mostly debate the K and particularly enjoy it, but that means I generally have a higher threshold to vote on it. Ks should definitely have links engaging the actual implications of the 1AC (more than a state link). I would say I'm familiar with a number of lit bases but don't ever assume that I know what you're talking about. I’m reasonably up in the lit on afropess, queer theory, marx/cap, semiotics, lacan. Anything else I have not spent extensive time understanding. Regardless you should debate in a way that ensure EVERYONE in the room understands what you’re saying and ensures that you’re not pulling some obscure theory that I haven’t read. EXPLAIN. I’m not omniscient like I said.

DA - Make SMART disads. explain the internal link story. The more specific to the aff the better. Uniqueness controls the direction of the link.

CP - CPs have the potential to be cool. Make smart cps. specific net benefits and concrete competition.

T - I have to admit, I like a good T/FW debate but there's a lot of mistakes made on both sides that make this kind of debate difficult. The Aff usually forgets to extend their aff but odds are the 2NR will forget to extend a terminal impact anyway. I will default to competing interpretations unless told otherwise

Case - Case debate is underutilized. I think most affs are bad. Not to say you shouldn't ever run aff, or I will never vote aff. I just think that affs always have some sort of fundamental contradiction/fallacy etc. that is inevitable in an event where we simulate praxis. Neg teams need to exploit that on the case page, and aff teams need to be ready to answer larger questions of solvency.

Theory - I actually really like a good theory debate. I think one of the most interesting things about debate, is your ability to debate debate. However I hold a high threshold to vote on it in the 2NR/2AR. You HAVE to extend terminal impact calculus though (which means shells like disclosure theory AND SKEP are rarely ever voters in my eyes).

***LD update Yale: I don’t like frivolous theory, I will likely never vote on it because I don’t think it has an impact or a point other than a “gotcha” in debates. You can try to prove me wrong if you wish. I’ve said I’m always open to changing my mind and you should absolutely read what you’re best at. This is a PSA though

Random thoughts

I like puns and scifi/comic references.

Speed is cool. Clarity is cooler. If I can't understand your tags/analytics/line-by-line I have no way of flowing it

Once I've signed the ballot the round is over. No returns or refunds. DO ask me informational questions about the RFD. DON'T argue with the decision. If it's a paper ballot I'll just start taking off speaks

Long overviews are OK. The same way I look at speed applies here. If I can't understand you, or your overview is a total mess I won't be able to evaluate it to its full potential.

I try not to read evidence. However, I will if I feel it is absolutely necessary to resolve the round. I will default to the speaker's interpretation of the evidence unless otherwise contested.

Full Judging Record

Tournament Lv Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
Lindale Fall TFA HS 2020-09-16 VCX Quarte Westwood Vishal Narra & Brandon Shin Lovejoy Daniel Lamping & Shruti Subramaniyan Aff Aff 3-0
Lindale Fall TFA HS 2020-09-16 VCX R1 L C Anderson Charlotte Gossett & Walker Gossett St Mark's School of Texas Aayush Goodapaty & Ned Tagtmeier Neg
NDA High School Debate Tournament 3 MS 2020-01-18 Open R3 SAHud GH SADit JA Neg
NDA High School Debate Tournament 3 HS 2020-01-18 Open R2 U RR SAHud RM Aff
NDA High School Debate Tournament 3 MS 2020-01-18 Nov R1 SA Queens 1 DR SA Midtown West SX Aff
NDA High School Tournament 2 HS 2019-12-21 Nov R3 Newark Tech AA Newark Science FF Neg
NDA High School Tournament 2 HS 2019-12-21 Open R2 NewSci KK U RJ Neg
NDA High School Tournament 2 HS 2019-12-21 Open R1 U RR NewSci JS Neg
NDA High School Debate Tournament 1 HS 2019-10-26 OPD R3 NewSci SQ SAHar LS Aff
NDA High School Debate Tournament 1 HS 2019-10-26 OPD R2 SAMid CM NewTec NW Neg
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD Double Bronx Science AW Needham ZL Neg Neg 3-0
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD Double Pembroke Pines Charter MO Stuyvesant MP Aff Aff 2-1
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD Trips Bergen County Academies EL Needham ZL Neg Neg 3-0
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD Trips Harrison MR Hunter SK Neg Neg 3-0
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R6 Lexington CL Montville NP Aff
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R6 Byram Hills SH Princeton TL Aff
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R5 Harrison MR Hunter NK Neg
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R5 Stuyvesant MP Needham ZL Aff
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R4 Lexington DY Hoover CL Neg
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R4 Richard Montgomery UF Cosby GA Neg
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R3 Bronx Science WF Stuyvesant GP Neg
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R3 Livingston GL Lexington AT Aff
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R2 Stuyvesant TM Lexington JC Neg
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R2 Harrison AA NSU SF Neg
Yale Invitational HS 2019-09-13 VLD R1 Woodgrove AC Bronx Science HL Neg
NDA High School Tournament 3 Tech HS 2019-01-26 Nov R3 Newark Science SA SA Ditmas Park MA Aff
NDA High School Tournament 3 Tech MS 2019-01-26 Open R2 SADit JD SAHud PW Aff
NDA High School Tournament 3 Tech MS 2019-01-26 Open R1 SAHud NV SADit CR Aff