Miriam Mokhemar ParadigmLast changed 10/12 11:45A EDT
A few things about me (TLDR version):
I'm a third year debater at the University of Georgia. I debated for Johns Creek High School and Mount Vernon Presbyterian School.
Impact calculus is important. Framing the debate round is very important.
Clarity > Speed
Cross-ex is binding.
If you can make good funny jokes about Georgia debaters, you'll probably get higher speaks.
Framework - I'm a good judge for framework. Debate is a game and framework is procedural question. I’m persuaded by negative appeals to limits and I think fairness is an impact in and of itself. I don’t think the topical version of the aff needs to “solve” in the same way the aff does. If there are disads to the topical version of the aff, that seems to prove neg ground under the negative’s vision of debate.
Kritiks - I think it's really hard for the neg to win that the aff shouldn't get to weigh the plan provided the aff answers framework well. I've got a decent grasp on the literature surrounding critical security studies, critiques of capitalism, and feminist critiques of IR. The aff should focus on attacking the alternative both at a substance and theoretical level. It's critical that the 2AR to be able to define the solvency deficits to the alternative and weigh that against the case. Negative debaters should spend more time talking about the case in the context of the kritik. A good, warranted link and turns the case debates are the best way for negative teams to get my ballot. Tell me how the links to the aff uniquely lead to the impacts.
Counterplans - My initial impression of whether your counterplan is legitimate will be whether or not you have a specific solvency advocate. There's nothing better than a well-researched mechanism counterplan and there's nothing worse than a hyper-generic process counterplan that you recycle for every negative debate on the topic. I generally think that conditionality is okay up to 2 conditional options, but I can be persuaded by 3 condo is okay. PICs are probably good. Consult/Conditioning/delay counterplans, international fiat, and 50 state fiat are bad.
Disads- I love a good DA and case debate. I've gone for the politics DA a lot in my colleg career. Normally uniqueness controls the link, but I can persuaded otherwise. Impact calc and good turns cases analysis is the best!
Paperless: If you are doing an e-mail chain please put me on it. My email is email@example.com. If you are flashing, prep time ends when the flash drive leaves your computer. If your computer crashes, stop the timer until you can get your doc back up.