Jordy Barry Paradigm

Last changed 9/26 3:09A EST

I am the Head Coach of Millburn High School in New Jersey. I have a bachelor's degree in Economics and Political Science and a master's degree in International Relations with a focus on International Law and Institutions.

I do my very best to be as non-interventionist as possible, but I know that students like reading judges paradigms to get a better sense of what they're thinking. I hope that the below is helpful :).

Here are some things to consider if I'm your judge in Congressional Debate:

- I am a sucker for a well-executed authorship, so please don't be afraid to give the first speech! Just because you don't have refutation doesn't mean it isn't a good speech. I will be more inclined to giving you a better speech score if you stand up and give the speech when no one is willing to do so.

- Bouncing off of the above bullet point, one of the things I really dislike while at national circuit tournaments is having no one stand up to give the earlier speeches (particularly in out rounds). You should be prepared to speak on either side of the legislation. You're there to debate, so debate.

- Asking the same question over and over to different speakers isn't particularly impressive to me (only in extreme circumstances should this ever be done). Make sure that you are catering the questions to the actual arguments from the speech and not asking generic questions that could be asked of anyone.

- Make my job easy as the judge. I will not make any links for you; you need to make the links yourself.

- If you are giving one of the final speeches on a piece of legislation, I expect you to weigh the arguments and impacts that we have heard throughout the debate. Unless there has been a gross negligence in not bringing up a particular argument that you think is revolutionary and changes the debate entirely, you shouldn't really be bringing up new arguments at this point. There are, of course, situations where this may be necessary, but this is the general rule of thumb. Use your best judgment :).

- Please do your best to not read off of your pad. Engage with the audience/ judges, and don't feel as though you have to have something written down verbatim. I'm not expecting a speech to be completely flawless when you are delivering it extemporaneously. I historically score speeches higher if delivered extemporaneously and have a couple of minor fluency lapses than a speech read off of a sheet of paper with perfect fluency.

- Be active in the chamber! Remember, the judges are not ranking students based upon who is giving the best speeches, but who are the best legislators overall. This combines a myriad of factors, including speeches, questioning, overall activity, leadership in the chamber, decorum, and active listening (i.e. not practicing your speech while others are speaking, paying attention, etc.) Keep this in mind before going into a session.

Let me know if you have any questions! :)

Here are some things to consider if I'm your judge in Public Forum:

- I am really open to hearing most any type of argument. Do your thing, be clear, and enjoy yourselves!

- It's important to me that you maintain clarity throughout the round.

- Take advantage of your final focus. Tell me why I should vote for you, don't solely focus on defensive arguments.

- Maintain organization throughout the round - your speeches should tell me what exact argument you are referring to the in the round. Sign posting is key! A messy debate is a poorly executed debate.

- I don't weigh one particular type of argument over another. I vote solely based on the flow, and will not impose my pre-existing beliefs and convictions on you. It's your show, not mine!

- I don't require front-lining in the summary, but if you feel as though it is necessary, do it.

- Be polite!

- Make my job easy. I should not have to (and will not) make any links for you. You have to make the link yourselves. There should be a clear connection to your impacts.

- Weighing impacts is critical to your success, so please do it!

Any questions, please feel free to ask!

Full Judging Record

Tournament Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2/3/2018 PF Octos Nueva PS Fairmont Prep Gurveer Singh & Adnan Ismail Neg Neg on a 3-0
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2/3/2018 PF Octos Northwood Independent David Choi & Amanda Miskell Saratoga Sathvik Koneru & Karthik Ramachandran Aff Aff on a 3-0
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2/3/2018 PF R6 Northwest Career And Technical Jonah Goldman & Brock Moody BASIS Scottsdale Bryan Yavari & Aditya Sidapara Neg
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2/3/2018 PF R4 Damien Logan Salabaj & Kyle Thorton East Amna Mujić & Gregoria Alegria Aff
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2/3/2018 PF R4 Coral Academy Of Science Las Vegas Victoria Greene & Holden Wei Rowland Hall Emily Fowler & Bella Goh Aff
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2/3/2018 PF R3 American Vishnu Kumar & Rohan Niranjan Harker Raymond Banke & Ekdatha Arramreddy Neg
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2/3/2018 PF R3 BASIS Scottsdale Kyle Soni & Harsha Boyilla Nueva AA Neg
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2/3/2018 PF R2 Eagle Emily Elfering & Peter Waters Rowland Hall Tim Zeng & Andrew Kimball Aff
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2/3/2018 PF R2 Saratoga Ayush Aggarwal & Arun Ramakrishna Campbell Hall Kyle Sihota & Riley Friedenberg Aff
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 VPF 2x Brophy CP SK College Prep PW Neg Neg on a 3-0
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 VPF 2x Harker LX Mission San Jose MK Neg Neg on a 2-1
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 VPF 3x Quarry Lane AS Dougherty Valley KB Neg Aff on a 2-1
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 VPF 3x Dougherty Valley LN Saratoga KW Neg Neg on a 2-1
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 NPF R6 Tucson GM Northridge CF Neg
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 NPF R6 Sky View CD Advanced Technologies Acad LF Aff
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 NPF R4 BASIS Ahwatukee HR La Cueva MJ Neg
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 NPF R4 Tucson SL Brophy CP BB Neg
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 NPF R2 BASIS Scottsdale RY Hamilton ZW Aff
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 NPF R2 McClintock HS Hamilton PM Neg
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 VPF R1 Leland BY Coronado AC Neg
Arizona State HDSHC Invitational 1/5/2018 VPF R1 Coral Academy Of Science Las Vegas DF Northwest Career And Technical GC Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 O PF Doub Flintridge Prep KL Riverside STEM SG Neg Aff on a 2-1
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 N PF R6 Flintridge Prep GB Bonita Vista AS Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 N PF R6 Bishop O'Dowd KF Riverside STEM KA Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 O PF R5 Crescenta Valley HS Damien RS Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 N PF R3 Bonita Vista ZP Riverside STEM AJ Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 N PF R3 Bonita Vista MP Claremont KL Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 N PF R2 Honor PP Bishop O'Dowd JM Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 N PF R2 Westridge LY Fairmont Prep LJ Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 O PF R1 College Prep HZ Magnet JS Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 O PF R1 Cambridge PS Nova 42 SH Aff
National Speech and Debate Tournament 6/19/2017 WS Quarte Carolina West White Florida Manatee Blue Neg Neg on a 3-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament 6/19/2017 WS R6 Idaho Gem of the Mountain Blue Greater Illinois Red Aff
National Speech and Debate Tournament 6/19/2017 WS R5 Rushmore Blue East Los Angeles White Neg
National Speech and Debate Tournament 6/19/2017 WS R2 Sunflower White Yellow Rose White Neg
National Speech and Debate Tournament 6/19/2017 WS R1 UIL White California Coast Blue Neg