Jackson Miller Paradigm

Last changed 18 March 2021 2:04 PM CDT

[Names of schools, years of graduation]

I debated for [number] years and made it to [a hotel ballroom nobody cares about].

Have fun always, try your best always. Like really I put it at the top for a reason. Don't insult your opponents. Don't be mean to your partner. The more you think you're better than them the more I'm gonna want you to be wrong.

Put me on the email chain please: jacksonemdebate@gmail.com

You know, last year I had this joke where I told people to listen to the main theme of the video game Arms while listening to my paradigm (*arms* sales), but I haven't really thought of an equivalent for this year's topic yet.

General

I know jack-squat about [topic], both in terms of the actual issue as well as how people have been debating it this year. So, I can’t wait for you to teach me! What I can assure you of though is that I’ll never go on facebook or anything during either speeches or cross-ex, and frankly that’s more than some judges can say.

Short version: Tech over truth. Long version: Remember that I am mortal. I would say evaluate my argument preferences under the assumption that those arguments have not been dropped/critically under-covered. Everybody says and understands that the judge votes for whoever best persuaded them, and that's true. But, I think what people often miss is that the judge isn't being persuaded in terms of which team they think is "right," but rather which team they think won the round.

[Statements that amount to "Make good arguments"]

Getting the sense defense has become severely underrated.

I get annoyed when judge paradigms tell you to "act like you care," because I think what they're really saying is "act like you care about winning." In reality, all you should be caring about is just debate itself - and that's distinct. So, I'll tell you to care about debate. I honestly didn't end up liking it very much in the end, but I'd maintain that policy debate is a very, uh...heuristic environment, and I stuck with it (kinda?) and am better off for it. But if you still don't care, just stop going to debate tournaments if you can. There's nothing wrong with not liking debate or not caring about it, and you don't owe it to anybody to participate if you really just don't wanna. But on a intra-tournament, round-to-round basis, not putting in full effort is probably bad.

Don'ts

Don't read suicide good. Don't read extinction good. Don't read warming good. Don't read racism good. Don't read sexism good. Don't have sex at camp. etc.

Boo to the Schlaang super seat and AntoniNO. I'm gonna suggest you don't read Baudrillard (I hope I spelled that incorrectly), both in front of me and in front of all your other judges.

Don't say "no neg fiat." If you read troll arguments like consult asgard or like time triangular pyramid I'll dock the 2N's speaks.

S e n d a n a l y t i c s, not n u d e s. I mean both parts of that sentence, though I recognize one of the parts is typically relevant only *during* debate rounds.

The only thing I absolutely 100% won't vote for are teams that lose the round. (jk i'm not actually that cocky.)

K Affs

I'm not calling them "planless affs" or "performance affs" or wutevr so that might already give you some indication.

The point of debate is to gain critical thinking skills by repeatedly practicing the comparative analysis of theoretical worlds (counting the squo as one) by framing facts and deductions as uniqueness, links, impacts, etc as a means of trying to understand the implication of those facts upon the imagined theoretical worlds. Critical thinking skills =/= the skill of criticizing things - that's just a coincidence in their spelling. Though, it also isn't at all as though those two concepts are just completely decoupled.

You can win without reading a plan, but you're going to have a rough time unless you have some reason why reading your aff and receiving a ballot improves the status quo. There are many ways to accomplish this and I really want you do at least one of them.

I'd say I find many of the framework arguments both neg and aff teams make to be pretty unconvincing and unoriginal. Neg teams, I'd love for you to think about why k affs would be hard to debate against even if they were predictable. Aff teams, I'd love to hear about why an inability to engage institutions irl means it's bad to debate [topic]. I could write a million of those requests.

This is gonna sound silly, but I honestly don't find fairness or predictability to be that convincing, at least not in the way I often saw them deployed. Like personally, never once have I heard of a high school debater or coach putting in the time to cut a case neg to an aff unless they already knew for a fact that that aff was being read by a team they were particularly afraid of. Yet at the same time, I do not at all think "predictability" is pointless to talk about. For fairness, I guess I'll just say "fairness is an internal link". I encourage you to really think about what people can get out of debate and what things like fairness and predictability really look like and what their implications are.

*Run framework*. Otherwise, I will be sad and not like the round very much so like just please do. If you think running framework is unethical or wutevr please strike me. Lol I had to have at least one of those in here.

Get creative with your 1NCs. Think about what new opportunities unconventional affs might afford you, both in terms of positions and args within flows. If a center-left layperson wouldn't think it's "unethical" to read, I probably won't either.

I feel like a lot of times when aff teams say "debate isn't a game," they still treat it like it is one.

Neg Kritiks

I'll definitely vote for some Ks, but if your link is only "you use the state" or "you use the [topic]” you're gonna have a tough time getting me to vote for the K.

I didn't even actually debate the [topic] topic I'm sorry I was just trying to look edgy.

But seriously, links are the most important part of K debates and DA debates alike because they, and they alone, are the root for any comparative analysis you can do. They are the only direct way for *you* to illustrate a distinction between the world you're advocating for and the world your opponents are advocating. All of your internal links and impacts are just arguments for why that discrepancy matters. (Okay yeah if they're running a CP differences between worlds are more obvious but like that was their move not *yours*.)

Number one tip I would say - both to the aff and the neg - is just impact out your args. Never assume I know why you auto-win if you "win the ontology debate." Similarly, you need to explain, impact and probably persuade me of things like "fiat isn't real" and "social death." It is likely that your "tricks" are - in my eyes - actually just bad arguments. Don't get me wrong, a dropped arg is a dropped arg, but a prerequisite to something being a dropped arg is it being an arg.

****

Also just like generally about "dropped arguments" - an argument being dropped means that it is substantially easier to extend, not that you no longer have to extend it. If you wanna go for a "dropped argument" in front of me then you should make sure to mention that argument's claim and warrant (and, in rebuttals, its implications for how the round should be decided) in every speech from when you first read it until the debate ends.

****

I default to assuming that the K has to have an alt that solves impacts and is mutually exclusive with the aff. If the impacts the k solves aren't as important as the one the aff solves, I'll vote aff.

"Extinction already 'happens, happened, or will have had happened' for x ppl bc social death" is a hard sell for me, especially if you're trying to argue that it means nuclear war isn't bad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iPH-br_eJQ

Go to case. Like with *defense*.

CPs

Have as many planks as you want. You can read new planks. You can probably amend existing planks, too.

Having a good solvency advocate (so like one from a source actually written in the context of [topic]) usually makes me think a counter-plan is more theoretically legit.

Love an intelligent counter-plan. I don't like process CPs but they definitely are a thing people read.

Theory and T

Honestly, refer to K aff section.

Probably won't win on T unless the aff really isn't T and there's some concrete, specific abuse. The abuse is less of an internal link to a fairness based-RoB and more just really strong evidence for why their model of debate is bad.

I'm much more likely to vote on theory and T when I'm convinced there was in-round abuse. I lean neg on condo but definitely do not think infinite condo is okay.

Everything Else

[Irrelevant opinions] (I mean to be fair that's like most of this paradigm but)

[Relevant opinions immediately made irrelevant by a barrage of qualifiers]

Other

[Encouraging you to make jokes even though in reality that always plays out really awkwardly in round]

If you make any references to the Persona franchise, I like cannot give you points because this is varsity but just like please still do. I don't know just say like, "perception shapes reality" instead of "discourse shapes reality," or throw my name into the jingle bells or something idk.

And look I mean on this topic you really shouldn't have too hard of a time making a Persona 5 reference. Just look at the topic: criminal, justice, and reform - all words I associate with Persona 5 albeit not when taken together.

Also sorry for being overly sarcastic and snarky in this judge paradigm. If I’m honest with myself, this might not reflect the true me.

Full Judging Record

Tournament Lv Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
Illinois Debate Coaches Association Novice JV State Championshi HS 2021-03-19 JVCX Quarte Glenbrook South SW Niles West KB Aff Aff 3-0
Illinois Debate Coaches Association Novice JV State Championshi HS 2021-03-19 JVCX R5 Walter Payton SS Niles North KF Aff
Illinois Debate Coaches Association Novice JV State Championshi HS 2021-03-19 JVCX R2 Oak Park and Ri BL Walter Payton SP Aff
IHSA State Debate Virtual Championships HS 2021-03-11 Policy R5 Maine East Rishi Shah & Benet Babu Varghese Evanston Twp Adela Bautista & Gabi Evans Neg Neg 2-0
IHSA State Debate Virtual Championships HS 2021-03-11 Policy R4 Northside Kyujin Derradji & Mia Sodini Glenbrook North Jack Barber & Derrik Chen Aff Aff 2-0
IHSA State Debate Virtual Championships HS 2021-03-11 Policy R3 Northside Lauren Hollis & Rithika Tudmilla Niles West Dulguun Bat-erdene & Ephraim Bennett Neg Neg 2-0
IHSA State Debate Virtual Championships HS 2021-03-11 Policy R2 Glenbrook North Paul Wallace & Fiona Yin Northside Samir Rahaman & Matthew Sung Neg
IHSA State Debate Virtual Championships HS 2021-03-11 Policy R1 Walter Payton Cole Weese & David McDermott Glenbrook South Connor Kiefer & Humza Khan Neg
The Cougar Classic at the University of Houston HS 2021-01-14 NCX Quarte SMSOT AP Barsto LS Neg Neg 2-1
The Cougar Classic at the University of Houston HS 2021-01-14 NCX Octos Barsto BA Greenh LJ Neg Neg 2-1
The Cougar Classic at the University of Houston HS 2021-01-14 Pol R5 Friend FC Shark SQ Neg
The Cougar Classic at the University of Houston HS 2021-01-14 Pol R4 Unionv PA Shark HL Neg
The Cougar Classic at the University of Houston HS 2021-01-14 NCX R2 Kinkai IM SilCre GK Neg
The Cougar Classic at the University of Houston HS 2021-01-14 NCX R1 Greenh KO Barsto GP Neg
The Paradigm Dowling Catholic HS 2020-12-11 NCX Fin Evanston Twp BE Mill Valley CP Neg Neg 3-0
The Paradigm Dowling Catholic HS 2020-12-11 NCX Sem Mill Valley CP Glenbrook South KS Aff Aff 2-1
The Paradigm Dowling Catholic HS 2020-12-11 NCX Octos Blue Valley Northwest KY Niles West TG Neg Neg 2-1
The Paradigm Dowling Catholic HS 2020-12-11 NCX R6 Blue Valley Northwest GW Glenbrook South KS Neg
The Paradigm Dowling Catholic HS 2020-12-11 NCX R5 Glenbrook South LS West HS SLC SZ Aff
The Paradigm Dowling Catholic HS 2020-12-11 NCX R4 Blue Valley Northwest FT Glenbrook South YS Neg
The Paradigm Dowling Catholic HS 2020-12-11 NCX R2 Niles West ET Mill Valley CM Neg
The Paradigm Dowling Catholic HS 2020-12-11 NCX R1 Glenbrook North GR Evanston Twp BE Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 NCX R6 Little Rock Central BM Isidore Newman NL Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 NCX R5 Niles West FC Westwood OP Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 NCX R4 Northview HP NSU AL Aff
Niles Township Invitational HS 2020-09-11 VCX R6 Evanston Twp BE Glenbrook North NS Neg
Niles Township Invitational HS 2020-09-11 VCX R5 Glenbrook North WY Pine Crest IW Aff
Niles Township Invitational HS 2020-09-11 VCX R3 Iowa City CM Glenbrook North KL Neg
Niles Township Invitational HS 2020-09-11 VCX R2 Pine Crest YG Northside DS Neg
Niles Township Invitational HS 2020-09-11 VCX R1 Glenbrook North MS Maine East ST Neg
46th Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament HS 2020-02-13 VCX Dbls Walter Payton VR Caddo Magnet KL Neg Neg 2-1
46th Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament HS 2020-02-13 JVCX R7 Josiah Quincy Upper CD SA Bronx MT Aff
46th Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament HS 2020-02-13 VCX R6 Thomas Jefferson HSST HT Walter Payton PH Neg
46th Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament HS 2020-02-13 JVCX R5 Stuyvesant LI Mamaroneck MM Neg
46th Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament HS 2020-02-13 VCX R4 James Logan MB Henry W Grady KT Neg
46th Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament HS 2020-02-13 JVCX R3 Mamaroneck ZP Lake Travis SG Aff
46th Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament HS 2020-02-13 VCX R2 Niles North VU Lexington CM Neg
46th Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament HS 2020-02-13 JVCX R1 Mamaroneck SM Stuyvesant LS Aff
ETHS Superb Owl HS 2020-01-31 CX R2 Northside KW Walter Payton RS Aff
ETHS Superb Owl HS 2020-01-31 CX R1 Glenbrook North GK Whitney Young GL Aff
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 CX 32 Lindblom Math and Science DS Glenbrook North BC Neg Neg 2-1
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 CX R6 Walter Payton LA SF Roosevelt LT Aff
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 CX R5 Minneapolis South CC Rosemount Sr HR Aff
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 JVCX R3 Northside TW Iowa City LC Aff
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 CX R2 Thomas Kelly RL Millard South SS Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VCX R7 Oakland Catholic AS Munster HB Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VCX R6 Highland Park Senior SK Cypress Bay LK Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VCX R5 Wooster WS Juan Diego Catholic MB Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VCX R4 Notre Dame DN Blue Valley Northwest BS Neg
Niles North Viking Rumble HS 2019-10-19 JV R4 Glenbrook North KS Glenbrook South SG Neg
Niles North Viking Rumble HS 2019-10-19 JV R3 Niles West KR Glenbrook North AM Neg
Niles North Viking Rumble HS 2019-10-19 JV R2 Oak Park and River Forest/Univ Of Chicago Lab BK Maine East BB Aff
Niles North Viking Rumble HS 2019-10-19 JV R1 Glenbrook South KK Glenbrook North DM Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2018-11-17 NCXRR R7 Niles West AT Dowling Catholic MP Aff Aff 2-0
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2018-11-17 NCXRR R6 Univ Of Chicago Lab NH Derby JL Neg Neg 2-0
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2018-11-17 NCXRR R5 Lane Tech HO Head Royce MS Aff
Niles North Viking Rumble HS 2018-10-20 JV R4 Jones CP KW Niles West WP Aff
Niles North Viking Rumble HS 2018-10-20 JV R3 Northside College Prep CH Jones CP KW Aff
Niles North Viking Rumble HS 2018-10-20 JV R2 Niles West SC Northside College Prep KH Neg
NSMSDL Spring Tournament T3 MS 2018-05-03 Var V2 Central Rosemarie & Jacob WJHS-HMS Ben & James & Noah Neg Neg 2-0
NSMSDL Spring Tournament T3 MS 2018-05-03 Nov N1 Central Emma & Eve & Zach WJHS-HMS Tasyn & Victoria Aff
Illinois Debate Coaches Association JV Novice State Championshi HS 2018-03-09 NCX R2 WhiYou GL GleSou LR Neg Neg 2-0
Illinois Debate Coaches Association JV Novice State Championshi HS 2018-03-09 NCX R1 Solori PL JonCP SA Neg Neg 2-0
Niles North Viking Rumble HS 2017-10-21 NOV R4 Glenbrook North CS Niles West PK Aff
Niles North Viking Rumble HS 2017-10-21 NOV R2 Glenbrook North BS Niles North CA Aff
Niles North Viking Rumble HS 2017-10-21 NOV R1 Niles West WP Niles North HK Aff