Michael Harrington Paradigm

Last changed 8/28 10:54A EDT

***I will fill this in or UD this when needed – I’m learning about my judging as the year progresses***

- Let me preface this w/ saying the 2019-2020 year (Space topic) is my first year out from debating, so do as you will with that.

- Yeah add me to the chain…Please don’t use my old email that some of you know—use this one: mikedebate97@gmail.com

- ***I seek to judge the round that occurred in front of me & to not only give feedback, but to also learn from you all [because you’re valid & you work hard on your arguments]. Every judge should come into a round with the openness to listen to the debaters b/c it isn’t their career #iSaidWhatiSaid. But if you saying something racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, ableist or problematic to anyone, then it’s a no-go. Other than that, DO YOU because you can’t let NO haters stop you from doing what you want in your career and that’s on period.***

- I’m a graduate student at Baylor. I debated four years at Liberty starting as a novice until my senior year where I ended my career as a 2x NDT octafinalist, CEDA quarterfinalist, & a first-round recipient. I did policy my novice year & more critical stuff my last three years. 1A/2N.

- Here’s how I would pref me if I was still debating (1: good – 4: eh).
Kritiks (identity politics): 1
Kritiks (high theory tingz): 4
Policy (Soft left): 2/3
Policy (Heg): ¾

- If you’re reading this before the round & you just need the basics: Big picture stories are my jam (i.e.- here’s the main story and how the aff implicates xyz OR how the aff does xyz bad thing). I LOVE ballot framing (i.e.- what we here for?). Condensed debates are always more nuanced (i.e.- sitting on a particular arg). I typically work backwards (i.e.- I evaluate the debate from the 2ar/2nr and circle what’s important/key args…So if it is important in the 1NC/1AC- make sure you have it in the 2NR/2AR). Don’t assume I know your lango on the K or the latest updates on the DA (i.e.- *insert big words* without explaining b/c you assume I know it won’t be the best thing to do). Last thing, have fun & be petty (not rude) – I know debate sometimes forces people to take everything so seriously all the time, but I promise it’s SO much better if you just doing you & having a good time!

Here’s the tea on your particular args:

Disads-

· I actually love a good disad debate! I think that a good link wall in the block is killer & it puts the aff in tougher positions.

· I think empirics that prove the story-line of the DA is SO helpful & slept on. (i.e.- this happened previously when X, which resulted in Y, but the distinction now is Z).

· To make these debates more juicy, I do think that there needs to be more impact distinction and framing than typical (i.e.- if y’all are both going for war scenarios, I need you to tell me more about why your scenario comes first or is more probable).

CPs-

· Ehhhh, if counterplans are you’re thing, I think you need to make sure you’re highlighting a few things for me: why it competes, (if there are) what parts of the aff do you do, & explaining the nuances/planks(if any) of the CP. I think having an overview that is precise & slowing down on that portion would be very beneficial if you’re going for the CP.

· Internal NBs are good, tbh (obvi external ones are as well). Just make sure you explain how the CP avoids said NB.

· If you’re going for/answering theory args, slow down! If you think you’re going to win a theory argument that was 5 seconds of speeding through your block, then lololol no.

Kritik (Identity based args) aff/neg-

· If this is your thing, do you! These debates are best when you isolate an understanding of how power operates in a simplistic way.

· If you’re going for “it’s a question of orientation” or “what we do in the face of X” – I’m good for you, but don’t shy away from explaining why that orientation is important, along with why the aff is necessary.

· I just think making sure you explain your stories interaction with the power you claim puts you in a better position—along with a way to navigate and/or solve said issue.

Kritik (POMO, etc) aff/neg-

· High theory? Make it low. I understand that some of y’all are deep-deep-deep in the archives with whatever lit base you come from, but remember that we aren’t. If you can’t explain to me in translation what you’re saying in the most basic form possible, then I may not be the best for you.

· Make applications, please. The way I can process something that is complex is by making sure I understand it in conjunction to said example.

· Mmm, yeah just explain everything v. simple & you’ll be fine.

Kritik (Security, Cap)-

· These are both viable options that I think are strategic. I think most policy-sided teams get so used to the DA debate that they don’t do well on explaining the theory of cap. I think a little more time on this in relation to the aff will do y’all justice.

· I do think that having/making contextualized links will make it more useful for you in the long run. (i.e.- having an identity ptx link, but then utilizing that in the block to explain how the aff manifest said link *we know they are this b/c the 1ac/2ac said….which means that…)

· **[THIS APPLIES TO ALL THE KRITIKS PORTION THOUGH] Make sure if you’re going for the alternative, you explain how that alt is able to overcome the links you’ve made. (If you can’t articulate why the alt solves the link, then you’re in a rough spot).

FW/T-

· No, they aren’t the same. But it is up to you to explain the difference to me.

· So one of the things that I clearly wait/listen for in the 2NR is a clear interpretation extension. In my career, I found that for critical debaters its always an uphill battle versus FW & they have to explain everything so thoroughly – but somehow fw/t debaters can win on these arguments b/c “we know what they meant” or “its clear what their interp is”…yeah, no! If it ain’t there & the aff points it out, then that’s not good for you. I do think T can be done and done good versus critical debaters (think Michigan GW or Harvard CM/MS), but I think mediocrity shouldn’t be tolerated.

· Fairness is an impact.

· Insofar as T goes, make sure you have definitions that are clearly extrapolating what your interpretation would justify/mean.

· TVA’s are poppin’—so yes, have some.

· I also think you should contextualize everything to the particular aff and CONTEST THE AFF on some level, please.

Theory args-

· Slow down on them, please. I’m not going to get all 17 points in twenty seconds if you blazing through them.

· Can be strategic for final speeches, but time needs to be allocated there earlier if that will be your option in final speeches.

· Read your blocks, but also answer their particular theory arg about why what you did/do is bad.

If something is unclear or you want to ask me a question about a particular argument, email me! I enjoy talking about how we think about debate. Have fun!

Full Judging Record

Tournament Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
ADA Nationals at UNLV 3/6/2020 Nov R6 Fullerton CM Houston EW Aff
ADA Nationals at UNLV 3/6/2020 Open R4 CSU Long Beach CS Emory PT Aff
ADA Nationals at UNLV 3/6/2020 JV R2 Houston NB Monmouth GC Aff
ADA Nationals at UNLV 3/6/2020 Nov R1 Houston HG Monmouth HR Aff
Texas Open 2/1/2020 OP Double Louisville BY Georgetown BP Aff Aff on a 3-0
Texas Open 2/1/2020 OP R7 Georgetown MW UT San Antonio HT Aff
Texas Open 2/1/2020 OP R5 Texas WC Michigan SV Neg
Texas Open 2/1/2020 JV R4 Houston GH Purdue AS Neg
Texas Open 2/1/2020 OP R3 Texas SW Houston BF Aff
Texas Open 2/1/2020 JV R1 Houston KP Kansas State DS Neg
Georgetown College Tournament 1/3/2020 Open 5 Rutgers-Newark BA Georgetown BP Neg
Georgetown College Tournament 1/3/2020 Open 4 Georgetown AG George Mason AR Aff
Georgetown College Tournament 1/3/2020 Open 2 George Mason DM Pittsburgh KF Neg
Georgetown College Tournament 1/3/2020 Open 1 Pittsburgh OM Emory PT Aff
Longhorn Classic at the University of Texas 12/6/2019 CCX Semifi Westwood SB Coppell DR Neg Neg on a 4-1
Longhorn Classic at the University of Texas 12/6/2019 CCX Quarte Hebron PK Little Rock Central GL Neg Neg on a 3-0
Longhorn Classic at the University of Texas 12/6/2019 CCX Double Lindale JS Westwood SB Neg Neg on a 3-0
Longhorn Classic at the University of Texas 12/6/2019 CCX R5 Coppell AK Greenhill FS Aff
Longhorn Classic at the University of Texas 12/6/2019 CCX R3 Hebron BS Crossings Christian YC Aff
Longhorn Classic at the University of Texas 12/6/2019 CCX R2 Liberal Arts and Science MS Westside KS Neg
Longhorn Classic at the University of Texas 12/6/2019 CCX R1 Ronald Reagan GP Mt. Pleasant HS Aff
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR DBLS Southern California KS Rutgers-Newark AH Neg Neg on a 4-1
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR RD 7 George Mason AR Georgetown MW Neg
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR RD 5 UT San Antonio HW Neg
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR RD 4 Michigan HL Georgetown AG Aff
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR RD 3 NYU JK West Georgia DS Neg
Franklin R Shirley at Wake Forest 11/23/2019 SHIR RD 1 James Madison HS George Mason BM Neg
Harvard College Tournament 11/2/2019 Open R7 Wake Forest EH Boston College DV Aff
Harvard College Tournament 11/2/2019 Open R6 Georgetown MW NYU JK Neg
Harvard College Tournament 11/2/2019 Open R4 Kansas BD Rutgers-Newark AH Aff
Harvard College Tournament 11/2/2019 Open R3 Georgetown AG Weber State SS Aff
Harvard College Tournament 11/2/2019 Open R1 Cal State Fullerton HR Georgetown BP Neg
GSU Atlanta Season Opener 9/14/2019 NOV R6 George Mason BI Houston KP Aff
GSU Atlanta Season Opener 9/14/2019 OP R5 UNLV BB Georgetown GK Neg
GSU Atlanta Season Opener 9/14/2019 NOV R3 James Madison DL George Mason RA Aff
GSU Atlanta Season Opener 9/14/2019 OP R1 George Mason BG James Madison BK Aff
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/15/2019 CX2 Semifi Chattahoochee Adam & Manne Westminster Yu & Li Neg Neg on a 5-0
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/15/2019 CX2 Quarte Greenhill Gouru & McDonald Chattahoochee Adam & Manne Neg Neg on a 3-0
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/15/2019 CX2 Octafi Greenhill Gouru & McDonald Berkeley Prep Zinober & Kapadia Aff Aff on a 3-0
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/15/2019 CX2 6 Niles West Bat-erdene & Bennett Georgetown Day Brooks & Simmons Aff
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/15/2019 CX2 5 Head Royce Ramaswamy & Wogan Chattahoochee Adam & Manne Neg
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/15/2019 CX2 4 Greenhill Gouru & McDonald Marist Verska & Ovadje Aff
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/15/2019 CX2 3 Blue Valley Southwest Stanfield & Wu Little Rock Central Tran & Kombathula Aff
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/15/2019 CX2 2 Carrollton Sacred Heart Mestre & Giustini Georgetown Day Berman & Johnson Neg
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/15/2019 CX2 1 Cambridge Halfon & Stockstill Georgetown Day Mason & Wohlstadter Neg
The Ridge Debates 12/7/2018 VPF Dubs Delbarton SG Fort Lee CP Aff Aff on a 2-1
The Ridge Debates 12/7/2018 VPF R5 Delbarton CS Horace Mann SB Aff
The Ridge Debates 12/7/2018 VPF R4 Trinity CB Scarsdale GE Aff
The Ridge Debates 12/7/2018 VPF R4 Dalton JB Winston Churchill DW Neg
The Ridge Debates 12/7/2018 VPF R2 Millburn BJ Chaminade FM Aff
The Ridge Debates 12/7/2018 VPF R2 Montgomery Blair WX Hunter XA Neg
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX Quarte Harker AM Kudos CL Neg Neg on a 3-0
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R5 Kudos CL Montgomery Bell YH Aff
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R4 SA Bed-Stuy BV SA Bronx 2 OL Neg
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R2 Asian Debate League WT SA Harlem West LS Aff
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R1 SA Ditmas Park PT Dr. Bessie Rhodes School of Global Studies BG Aff
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD R2 Harvard-Westlake SM Cy-Fair TW Neg
Cornell Policy Tournament The Tournament of Love 10/7/2017 Nov R4 Cornell KS Rochester MS Neg
Cornell Policy Tournament The Tournament of Love 10/7/2017 Nov R3 Rochester VV Binghamton MG Neg
Cornell Policy Tournament The Tournament of Love 10/7/2017 Nov R2 Binghamton RD Boston College OW Aff
Cornell Policy Tournament The Tournament of Love 10/7/2017 Nov R1 Rochester KK Binghamton BW Neg