Shyam Mani Paradigm

Last changed 12/6 5:20P CST

If you have any additional questions about my judging style or experience I'm open to answering them before rounds start. This paradigm will be cleaned up later, but I hope this is enough information to use for prefs and strikes. If you're like me and wait until the last minute to finish strikes, feel free to jump to the bottom, I tried to summarize my entire paradigm in a couple sentences. For those of you that have time before round or strikes, I recommend reading the entire thing, It'll help you in round.

I have a Public Forum background. I debated PF for 4 years at Brookfield East High School in Wisconsin, and am currently a student at Northwestern University. In high school, I debated on the nat circuit between 3-4 times each year, so I have a decent understanding of how nat circuit tournaments and rounds work. In addition to the nat circuit and local WI circuit, I broke to late elims at NSDA multiple years. Essentially, treat me like any other college student ex-PFer.

My judging style is pretty standard for the nat circuit.

First, make extensions in summary, and those extensions should form the basis of the final focus (don't make new args in FF)

Second, this may just be a personal thing, but for rebuttal, I like to hear the second team come back and defend their own case. If nothing else, I expect the second rebuttal to respond to turns on their case. That's just something I did as a debater, and something I think makes a second rebuttal stronger.

Third, I can handle speed in PF. You can read semi-fast and I'll be able to follow, but obviously, don't spread or you'll lose me. If you ever get too fast for me, I'll look up at you and slow down my writing, and that should be your cue to slow down (I won't ever drop my pen and cross my arms though because I got really annoyed when judges did that to me). This sounds harsh, but it's your loss if I can't flow everything in your case and have trouble connecting the extensions, so keep that in mind when you speak fast. We all miss warrants and impacts occasionally, and I'll try my best to minimize that, but this is just something to consider.

Fourth, keep your speeches organized. I want to flow as much as I can so I have what I need to make an informed decision, but if your summary/rebuttal/FF is randomly jumping back and forth between arguments, it's hard for me to follow.

Fifth, during FF, please please give me voters, and usually just between 1-2. The worst final focuses are ones that turn into a 3rd rebuttal. I tend to vote on 1-2 issues in the round max so crystallize, consolidate, and PLEASE weigh the round in the last two speeches. It makes my job so much easier if you can execute a clean impact calculus for important args. Summaries and FF are meant to have arguments dropped; part of a good summary is knowing which arguments to drop and which to weigh, I won't hold it against you for dropping an arg in the round that neither team is going for. I can explain more about my FF philosophy before the round if you need more info.

Sixth, I don't really care what happens in cross-fire. I only feel the need to say that because I know horror stories of being dropped based on something that happens in cross. Unless your opponent literally concedes their entire position, I won't base my decision on that. Just don't personally attack your opponents during that time and we'll be good. I understand that cross can get heated, I got annoyed as a debater too, so your speaks won't take a big hit if I can tell you're frustrated. Just maintain some professionalism and you'll be fine.

On the topic of speaks, I'm pretty lenient. If you do a good job in the round you don't have to worry, you probably got decent speaks (I'm talking 28.5-29). The most frustrating moment in PF out rounds is to find out you didn't break because one shitty judge gave you awful speaks. I'll try not to be that person. I give 30s to debaters I think killed it and are probably going to do well.

Off-time roadmaps: A lot of judges hate these, but I'm totally cool with them as long as they are <10 secs. Just give me a quick summary of where you'll be going in the speech (i.e aff case then neg case, framework and then down the opponent's case, etc.). It helps me follow along on my flow.

Arguments: I will pretty much buy anything you explain well, extend well, and impact well. Don't make arguments that are logically flawed or impact to the zombie apocalypse (there's a reason you aren't in policy). Basically, don't unreasonably stretch the scope of the resolution and you'll be good.

Evidence: Use a good balance of evidence and logic in your arguments and I will buy it, don't rely too much on one or the other. I'll call for a card under any of these circumstances (if there aren't tournament rules regarding evidence)

1. I think you purposefully miscut a card or it sounds super sketchy.

2. The interpretation of the card changes as the round progresses. If I'm confused as to what the card actually says by the end, I will call for it.

3. The card gets muddled during the round and becomes important towards the end. If the two teams have different interpretations of the same card and it's important to either narrative, I'll call it.

4. There is an evidence challenge.

RFDs: I wasn't a fan of rounds where judges didn't disclose, so I'll at least let both teams know who won and lost. If we have some time, I'll go a bit more in-depth about why I voted the way I did, and answer any questions you may have.

SUMMARY: Ok, if you are reading this part it's probably because you need to make a quick decision on who to strike. Basically, I'm an ex-PFer and college student from Wisconsin, I debated on the nat circuit all 4 years of high school, so I know what nat circuit PF looks like. Make good extensions in summary, use those in FF. I can handle PF speed, but obviously, don't abuse that. Stay organized and give me voters in FF. Treat me as you would pretty much any other ex-PFer.

At the end of the day, just have fun with rounds. This is an activity you chose to do, and you should enjoy the time you have with it.

Full Judging Record

Tournament Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
Last Ditch WSDT Qualifier 1/4/2020 PF R5 Menomonee Falls LS Brookfield Central RaRu Neg
Last Ditch WSDT Qualifier 1/4/2020 PF R3 Menomonee Falls FB Brookfield Central RR Neg
Last Ditch WSDT Qualifier 1/4/2020 LD R1 Sussex Hamilton HS Menomonee Falls AS Aff
West Bend Debate Extravaganza 11/2/2019 PF N R5 Sheboygan North BS Middleton GP Neg
West Bend Debate Extravaganza 11/2/2019 PF V R3 Mukwonago WR Madison West CN Neg
West Bend Debate Extravaganza 11/2/2019 PF V R2 Neenah YD Madison West CC Neg
West Bend Debate Extravaganza 11/2/2019 PF N R1 Middleton GL Brookfield Central HB Neg
NCFL Grand Nationals 5/25/2019 PF R5 4166 4141 Aff Aff on a 2-1
NCFL Grand Nationals 5/25/2019 PF R5 4031 4117 Aff Aff on a 2-1
NCFL Grand Nationals 5/25/2019 PF R4 4180 4023 Aff Aff on a 3-0
NCFL Grand Nationals 5/25/2019 PF R4 4142 4123 Neg Neg on a 2-1
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/19/2019 PF R11 Madison West JW Whitefish Bay FE Aff Neg on a 4-1
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/19/2019 PF Qtr JMM SR Whitefish Bay FE Neg Neg on a 3-0
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/19/2019 PF Octo JMM GV Middleton SS Aff Aff on a 2-1
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/19/2019 PF R5 Middleton CS Madison West JW Neg
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/19/2019 PF R1 Madison West AL West Bend SW Aff
Southern Wisconsin District Tournament 1/5/2019 PF R2 WesBen SW Middle LD Neg Neg on a 3-0
Southern Wisconsin District Tournament 1/5/2019 LD R1 Golda Meir DP Bradley Tech JH Aff Aff on a 3-0
West Bend Debate Extravaganza 11/3/2018 VPF R5 Appleton North SK Janesville Parker AE Aff
West Bend Debate Extravaganza 11/3/2018 VPF R4 Brookfield Central RT Waukesha South LV Neg
West Bend Debate Extravaganza 11/3/2018 VPF R3 Sheboygan North SS Madison West CR Neg
West Bend Debate Extravaganza 11/3/2018 VPF R2 Whitefish Bay GC Appleton North PF Aff
West Bend Debate Extravaganza 11/3/2018 VPF R1 James Madison Memorial KV Madison West CN Aff
Brookfield East Debate Tournament 10/20/2018 PFV R2 Middleton LR Whitefish Bay GD Neg
Brookfield East Debate Tournament 10/20/2018 PFN R1 Sheboygan North SG Middleton MM Neg
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/20/2018 PF Octo Appleton North PK Madison West HJ Neg Neg on a 3-0
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/20/2018 PF R6 Appleton North GY West Bend SW Aff
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/20/2018 PF R5 West Bend CM Brookfield Central KJ Aff
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/20/2018 PF R3 West Bend BK Brookfield Central RN Aff
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/20/2018 PF R1 Madison West JW Waukesha South LV Aff
Wisconsin State Debate Tournament 1/20/2018 PF R1 Whitefish Bay GC Madison West SC Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VPF Sextos Miami Beach Sr SD Strake Jesuit College Prep SD Aff Aff on a 3-0
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VPF R3 Charlotte Latin LS Westlake HS (Austin) DH Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VPF R3 Chanhassen MB Newsome EA Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VPF R1 Plano West Senior LY Carroll HS - Southlake LS Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VPF R1 Sequoyah RP Bettendorf DQ Neg
BEHS 10/7/2017 BQ R5 Brookfield East SK Brookfield East CD Neg
BEHS 10/7/2017 BQ R3 Brookfield East AB Brookfield East AK Aff
BEHS 10/7/2017 BQ R2 Brookfield East NA Brookfield East AF Aff
BEHS 10/7/2017 BQ R1 Brookfield East XG Brookfield East NA Aff