Doug Miller Paradigm

Last changed 2 April 2021 3:18 PM CDT

Currently Assistant Coach for Washburn Rural (KS)

Formerly Assistant Coach at Lake Highland (FL), and Head Coach of Fairmont Prep (CA), Ransom Everglades (FL) & Pembroke Hill (MO)

Coached for nearly 20 years – Have coached all events. Have coached both national circuit policy & PF.

Address for the email chain: miller.douglas.n@gmail.com

Scroll down for Policy Paradigm

Public Forum Paradigm

Short Version

  1. If you want me to evaluate anything in the final focus you MUST extend it in the summary. That includes case attacks.
  2. Absent any other framing arguments, I will default to a utilitarian offense/defense paradigm.
  3. Narrow the 2nd half of the round down to one key contention-level impact story and 1-2 key answers on your opponents’ case.
  4. No new cards in 2nd Summary. No new cards in 1st Summary unless directly in response to new 2nd Rebuttal arguments.
  5. Make sure you evidence really says what you say it does.
  6. 2nd Rebuttal should rebuild + extend any portions of case they want to go for in FF.
  7. For virtual debates, don't go quite so fast. The tech doesn't do quite as well in effectively conveying a pace of delivery that I normally would have no problem with in person.

Long Version

1. Summary extension

If you want me to evaluate anything in the final focus you MUST extend it in the summary. Yes, that includes defense & turns from the rebuttal. In fact, that especially includes defense & turns from the rebuttal. If you want to go for it in the FF, make sure your partner knows to extend it. Even if it is the best argument I’ve ever heard, failure to at least mention it in the summary will result in me giving the argument zero weight in my decision. Basically, too many 2nd speakers just ignore their partner’s summary speech. Attempting to extend things that were clearly dropped in the Summary will result in a lowering of speaker points for the 2nd speaker. This is # 1 on my list for a reason. It plays a major factor in more than half of my decisions. Ignore this advice at your own peril.

1A. 2nd Rebuttal Rebuild

Everything I just said about Summary also goes for 2nd Rebuttal. Anything you want me to evaluate at any later point in the round needs to be mentioned/extended in 2nd Rebuttal. That includes extending / rebuilding the portions of your case you want me to weigh at the end, even those that were not addressed by your opponents in the first Rebuttal. For example: 1st Rebuttal just answers your links on C1. You not only need to rebuild whatever C1 links you want me to evaluate at the end of the round, but you also need to explicitly extend your impacts you are claiming those links link to in at least a minimum of detail. Just saying" extend my impacts" will be unlikely to cut it. At least try to reference both the argument and the card you want me to extend. And, yes, I know this means you won't be able to cover as much in 2nd Rebuttal. Make choices. That's what this event is all about.

2. Offense defense

Absent any other framing arguments, I will default to a utilitarian offense/defense paradigm. Just going for defensive response to the the opposing case in FF won’t be persuasive in front of me. Additionally, I am open to non-traditional framing arguments (e.g. rights, ontology, etc), but you will need to have some pretty clear warrants as to why I should disregard a traditional net offensive advantage for the other team when making my decision.

3. Narrow the round

It would be in your best interest to narrow the 2nd half of the round down to one key contention-level impact story and 1-2 key turns on your opponents’ case, and then spend most of your time doing impact comparisons on those issues. Going for all 3 contentions and every turn you read in rebuttal is a great way to lose my ballot. If you just extend everything, you leave it up to me to evaluate the relative important of each of your arguments. This opens the door for judge intervention, and you may not like how I evaluate those impacts. I would much rather you do that thought process for me. I routinely find myself voting for the team that goes all in on EFFECTIVE impact framing on the issue or two they are winning over the team that tries to extend all of their offensive arguments (even if they are winning most of them) at the expense of doing effective impact framing. Strategic choices matter. Not making any choices is a choice in itself, and is usually a bad one.

4. No new cards in Summary, unless they are in direct response to a new argument brought up in the immediately prior speech.

1st Summary: If you need to read cards to answer arguments first introduced in opponents case, those needed to be read in 1st Rebuttal, not 1st Summary. Only if 2nd Rebuttal introduces new arguments—for example a new impact turn on your case—will I evaluate new cards in the 1st Sum, and only to specifically answer that new 2nd Rebuttal turn. Just please flag that your are reading a new card, and ID exactly what new 2nd Rebuttal argument you are using it to answer.

2nd Summary: Very rarely, 2nd summary will need to address something that was brought up new in 1st summary. For example, as mentioned above, 2nd Rebuttal puts offense on case. 1st Summary might choose to address that 2nd Rebuttal offense with a new carded link turn. Only in a case like that will I evaluate new evidence introduced into 2nd Summary. If you need to take this route, as above in 1st Summary, please flag exactly what argument you say was new in the 1st Summary you are attempting to answer before reading the new card.

In either case, unless the prior speech opened the door for you, I will treat any new cards in Summary just like extending things straight into FF & ignoring the summary—I won’t evaluate them and your speaker points will take a hit. However, new cross-applications of cards previously introduced into the round ARE still OK at this point.

4A. No new cross-applications or big-picture weighing in Final Focus.

Put the pieces together before GCF - at least a little bit. This includes weighing analysis. The additional time allotted to teams in Summary makes it easier to make these connections and big-picture comparisons earlier in the round. Basically, the other team should at least have the opportunity to ask you about it in a CF of some type. You don't have to do the most complete job of cross-applying or weighing before FF, but I should at least be able to trace its seed back to some earlier point in the round.

5. Theory

I will, and am often eager to, vote on debate theory arguments. That being said, debaters in PF rarely, if ever, know how to debate theory well enough to justify voting on it.

I believe that there are several highly abusive forms of advocacy that are very bad for PF, and just bad debate in general. I welcome a discussion of those practices in round, and believe that the best way to stamp them out is for teams to make those abuses voting issues in rounds. I won’t vote on these issues unless the objections are raised and effectively argued in-round (e.g. impacted, extended in all the necessary speeches, etc). but I have strong leanings that make me VERY receptive to several theory arguments.

Fiat – Until the “no plans” rule is changed, PF is essentially a whole-resolution debate, no matter how much teams would like for it to be policy. Thus, if teams want to read a specific subset(s) of the resolution, they need to provide some warrants as to why their specific subset(s) of the resolution is the MOST LIKELY form the resolution would take if it were adopted. Trying to specify and only defend a hyper-specific example(s) of the resolution that is unlikely to occur without your fiat is ridiculously abusive without reading a plan text, and makes you a moving target – especially when you clarify your position later in the round to spike out of answers. Plan texts are necessary to fiat something that is unlikely to happen in order to create a stable advocacy. Basically, in my mind, “no plans” = “no fiat.”

Multiple conditional advocacies – Improbable fiated advocacies are bad enough, but when teams read multiple such advocacies and then decide “we’re not going for that one” when the opposing team puts offense on it is the zenith of in-round abuse. Teams debating in front of me should continue to go for their unanswered offensive turns against these “kicked” arguments – I will weigh them in the round, and am somewhat inclined to view such practices as a voter if substantial abuse is demonstrated by the offended team. If you start out with a 3-pronged fiated advocacy, then you darn well better end with it. Severance is bad. If teams are going to choose to kick out of part of their advocacy mid-round, they need to effectively answer any offense on the "to-be-kicked" parts first.

6. Arguments in Crossfire

If you want me to evaluate an argument or card, it needs to be in a speech. Just mentioning it in CF is not sufficient. You can refer to what was said in CF in the next speech, and that will be far more efficient, but it doesn’t exist in my mind until I hear it in a speech.

7. Evidence availability

If you read any evidence, have the card available to hand over. Immediately (within reason, of course). Constructives should have their cards ready to hand over, in order, (probably even in the same document) because you know someone is going to ask for them. And having a bunch of PDF’s that you have to Command-F is not having your cards available. That is just lazy debating. Cut a card like a real debater. If you don’t know what that means, look it up. If you are reading this deep into a judge paradigm, it means you’re a big kid now. Act like it. As far as time is concerned, taking 10 minutes to find a card is inexcusable. At some point, I will just say you can’t find it, and and tell you to move on. This is becoming enough of a problem that I’m considering starting a running clock for “evidence hunting time.” I’m not there yet, but this practice really annoys me (and ALL judges), and needs to be stopped. If you can’t find the card you read in a reasonable amount of time, “Just drop it off the flow,” is not a sufficient recourse. In my mind, that is tantamount to evidence fabrication. If it happens once, I will be annoyed and chastise you after the round, but I’ll likely grudgingly give you the benefit of the doubt. If it happens multiple times, I am likely to be persuaded should the opposing team make such offenses a well-warranted and properly extended theory voting issue in the round.

8. Evidence Quality

I will, on occasion, ask to see key pieces of evidence at the end of the round as I make my decision. If I do ask for cards, and the text of the evidence you provide me doesn't match up with the argument you make in-round (e.g. egregious power-tagging, taking out of context, etc - basically, more than what I perceive to be an honest mistake), I reserve the right to penalize the team providing the evidence, even if the opposing team does not bring up the quality of the card in question as an issue in the round. Best case for the offending party: I will simply not evaluate the evidence in question and decide the round as though that card has been redacted from the debate, leaving the argument with the same functional weight as an unsupported analytic. Worst case: If I see multiple offenses in the round, see a particularly egregious offense, or have seen and commented on the team committing the same kind of offense in previous rounds I've judged, I may choose to drop the team solely on evidence quality. This is the one and only form of judge intervention I will engage in, as I have increasingly seen far too many teams functionally fabricating evidence and getting away with it because there is simply not enough time for opponents to question each and every card. Someone needs to serve as a check on such practices, and I believe judges should have a hand in that service. Rest assured, I will not decide a round in such fashion often, or without serious cause. I understand the serious ramifications of judges deciding rounds arbitrarily. If I do have a serious enough issue with your evidence to warrant some sort of intervention (which, again, is still very rare for me), I will be very clear in my RFD what the issue was, and how it factored into my decision, so that students can learn to not make the same mistakes again.

9. Evidence citations

You should probably read the citations according to whatever the NSDA says, but I’m not likely to vote on any irregularities (e.g. no date of access) unless the abuses are proven to be especially egregious and substantive in the round.

10. Speaker points

My reference point for “average” is 27.5. That’s where most everyone starts. My default is to evaluate on a scale with steps of 0.1, as opposed to steps of 0.5. Below a 25 means you did something offensive. A true 30.0 in HS debate (on a 0.1 scale) doesn’t exist. It is literally perfect. I can only think of 3 times I have ever given out a 29.6 or higher, and each of them were because of this next thing. My points are almost exclusively based on what you say, not how you say it. I strongly value making good, strategic choices, and those few exceptional scores I’ve given were all because of knowing what was important and going for it / impact framing it, and dumping the unnecessary stuff in the last half of the round.

11. "What's your methodology?"

Asking “What’s the methodology of your study” is a huge pet peeve of mine. Nails on a chalkboard bad. It’s a lazy way of saying, “I don’t really have an answer to this, so I’m just going to ask a bunch of questions about it and hope that clouds the debate enough to make it go away.” Questions about a card/study without evidence/warrants supporting the opposite aren’t arguments against it. They are just tricks debaters who got out-researched use to cover up that they got out-researched. In short, they are defensive only, and are only offensive if there are warrants / evidence as to why the opposite conclusion is true.

12. Ask for additional thoughts on the topic

Even if you’ve read this whole thing, still ask me beforehand. I will probably have some specific thoughts relating to the topic at hand that may be useful.

13. Speed

Notice how I didn't say anything about that above, even though it's the first questions like half of kids ask? Yeah, that's intentional. If you can't figure out the answer to that question from the numerous comments above, then you really are beyond help. But basically, yes, I can handle your blazing speed, you debate god, you. But it would still probably be a good idea to slow it down a little, Speed Racer. Quality > quantity.

________________________

Policy Paradigm

________________________

I debated for 4 years in high school (super old-school, talk-pretty policy), didn't debate in college, and have coached at the HS level for 15+ years. I am currently an Assistant Coach at Washburn Rural in KS, and previously was head coach at Fairmont Prep in Anaheim, CA, Ransom Everglades School, in FL, and The Pembroke Hill School in MO. However, I don't judge too many policy rounds these days, so take that into account.

Overview:

Generally, do what you do, as long as you do it well, and I'll be happy. I prefer big-picture impact framing where you do the comparative work for me. In general, I will tend to default to such analysis, because I want you to do the thinking in the round, not me. My better teams in the past read a great deal of ontology-based Ks (cap, Heidegger, etc), and they often make some level of sense to me, but I'm far from steeped in the literature. I'm happy to evaluate most of the normal disads & cps, but the three general classes of arguments that I usually find less persuasive are identity-based strategies that eschew the topic, politics disads, and to a lesser degree, performance-based arguments. But if any of those are your thing, I would in general prefer you do your thing well than try and do something else that you just aren't comfortable with. I'll go with the quality argument, even if it isn't my personal favorite. I'm not a fan of over-reliance on embedded clash, especially in overviews. I'd rather you put it on the line-by-line. I'm more likely to get it down on my flow and know how to apply it that way, and that's the type of debating I'll reward with higher speaks. Please be sure to be clear on your tags, cites, and theory/analytic blocks. Hard numbering/”And’s” are appreciated, and if you need to, go a little slower on those tags, cites, and theory/analytic blocks to be sure they are clear, distinct, and I get them. Again, effort to do so will be rewarded with higher speaks.


Topicality:

I generally think affs should have to defend the topic, and actually have some sort of plan text / identifiable statement of advocacy. There are very few "rules" of debate, thus allowing tons of leeway for debaters to choose arguments. But debating the topic is usually a pretty good idea in my mind, as most issues, even those relating to the practices and nature of our activity, can usually still be discussed in the context of the topic. I rather strongly default to competing interpretations. I like to see T debates come down to specific abuse stories, how expanding or contracting limits functionally impacts competitive equity, and exactly what types of ground/args are lost/gained by competing interps (case lists are good for this in front of me). I usually buy the most important impact to T as fairness. T is an a priori issue for me, and K-ing T is a less than ideal strategy with me as your judge.

Theory:

If you are going to go for it, go for it. I am unlikely to vote either way on theory via a blippy cheap-shot, unless the entire argument was conceded. But sometimes, for example, condo bad is the right strategic move for the 2AR, If it's done well, I won't hesitate to decide a round on it. Not a fan of multiple conditional worlds. With the notable exception of usually giving epistemology / ontology-based affs some flexibility on framework needing to come before particulars of implementation, I will vote Neg on reasonable SPEC arguments against policy affs. Affs should be able to articulate what their plan does, and how it works. (Read that you probably ought to have a plan into that prior statement, even if you are a K team.) For that reason, I also give Neg a fair amount of theoretical ground when it comes to process CPs against those affs. Severance is generally bad in my mind. Intrinsicness, less so.

CPs:

Personally, I think a lot of the standard CPs are, in any type of real world sense, ridiculous. The 50 states have never worked together in the way envisioned by the CP. A constitutional convention to increase funding for whatever is laughable. An XO to create a major policy change is just silly (although over the last two administrations, that has become less so). All that being said, these are all legit arguments in the debate world, and I evaluate and vote on them all the time. I guess I just wish Affs were smart enough to realize how dumb and unlikely these args actually are, and would make more legit arguments based on pointing that out. However, I do like PICs, and enjoy a well thought out and deployed advantage CP.

Disads:

Most topic-related disads are fine with me. Pretty standard on that. Just be sure to not leave gaping holes / assumptions in your link chains, and I'm OK. However, I generally don't like the politics disad. I would much rather hear a good senator specific politics scenario instead of the standard “President needs pol cap, plan’s unpopular” stuff, but even then, I'm not a fan. I'll still vote for it if that's what is winning the round, but I may not enjoy doing so. Just as a hint, it would be very easy to convince me that fiat solves for most politics link stories (and, yes, I understand this places me in the very small minority of judges), and I don't see nearly as much quality ground lost from the intrinsic perm against politics as most. Elections disads, though, don't have those same fiat-related issues, and are totally OK by me.

Criticisms:

I don’t read the lit much, but in spite of that, I really kind of like most of the more "traditional" ontological Ks (cap, security, Heidegger, etc). To me, Ks are about the idea behind the argument, as opposed to pure technical proficiency & card dumping. Thus, the big picture explanation of why the K is "true," even if that is at the expense of reading a few more cards, would be valuable. Bringing through line-by-line case attacks in the 2NR to directly mitigate some of the Aff advantages is probably pretty smart. I think Negs set an artificially high burden for themselves when they completely drop case and only go for the K in the 2NR, as this means that they have to win 100% access to their “Alt solves the case” or framework args in order for the K to outweigh some super-sketchy and ridiculous, but functionally conceded, extinction scenario from the 1AC. K's based in a framework strategy tend to be more compelling in front of me than K's that rely on the alt to actually solve something (because, let's be honest here - they rarely do). Identity-related arguments are usually not the most compelling in front of me, and I tend to buy strategic attacks against them from the left as more persuasive than attacks from the right.

Random:

I understand that some teams are unbalanced in terms of skill/experience, and that's just the way it goes sometimes. I've coached many teams like that. But I do like to see if both debaters actually know what they are talking about. Thus, your speaks will probably go down if your partner is answering all of your cross-ex questions for you. It won’t impact my decision (I just want to know the answers), but it will impact speaks. Same goes for oral prompting. That being said, I am inclined to give a moderate boost to the person doing the heavy lifting in those cases, as long as they do it respectfully.

Full Judging Record

Tournament Lv Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2021-06-07 PF R12 1063 1205 Pro Pro 2-1
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2021-06-07 PF R11 1032 1326 Con Con 2-1
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2021-06-07 PF R9 1360 1069 Con Con 3-0
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2021-04-10 PF Dbls Blake HS Riverdale Country GM Pro Con 2-1
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2021-04-10 NPF R5 Fullerton Union YM Bethesda Chevy Chase RS Con
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2021-04-10 PF R4 Dougherty Valley DC Harker RJ Con
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2021-04-10 PF R2 Blake PR Paradise Valley NS Pro
Blue Valley North Stampeding Galloping Dashing Mustang Invitati HS 2021-03-26 LD R4 Shawnee Mission South JS Lawrence JS Neg
Blue Valley North Stampeding Galloping Dashing Mustang Invitati HS 2021-03-26 LD R3 Shawnee Mission South AS Blue Valley North LP Neg
Blue Valley North Stampeding Galloping Dashing Mustang Invitati HS 2021-03-26 LD R2 Shawnee Mission South OK Lawrence DM Aff
Blue Valley North Stampeding Galloping Dashing Mustang Invitati HS 2021-03-26 LD R1 Shawnee Mission South MB Manhattan AN Aff
2021 Maverick Virtual Invitational HS 2021-03-03 LD R4 Derby Johnson Trinity Brake Neg
2021 Maverick Virtual Invitational HS 2021-03-03 LD R3 Wichita East Halabi Trinity Taylor Aff
2021 Maverick Virtual Invitational HS 2021-03-03 LD R2 Episcopal School of Dallas Solomon Trinity Marquardt Aff
2021 Maverick Virtual Invitational HS 2021-03-03 PFD R1 Lansing Thompson & Ymker Wichita East Siddique & Dallas Neg
Derby Panther Forensics Invitational HS 2021-02-24 LD R1 Manhattan Alex Wang Andover Hunter Smith Aff
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2021-02-05 VPF R5 Centennial MJ SF Roosevelt KN Con
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2021-02-05 VPF R4 Centennial AV SF Roosevelt KZ Pro
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2021-02-05 VPF R2 Jasper MZ Coppell LJ Pro
Kansas Sunflower Novice State Invitational HS 2021-01-08 Nov R6 Lawrence OS Blue Valley VP Neg
Kansas Sunflower Novice State Invitational HS 2021-01-08 NOp R4 Lansing CC Campus GK Aff
Kansas Sunflower Novice State Invitational HS 2021-01-08 Nov R3 Spring Hill BD Salina South FP Aff
Kansas Sunflower Novice State Invitational HS 2021-01-08 Nov R2 Chanute SF St James PD Aff
Kansas Flint-Hills District Tournament HS 2020-12-11 CX R7 104 106 Aff Aff 3-0
Kansas Flint-Hills District Tournament HS 2020-12-11 CX R5 114 112 Aff Aff 3-0
Kansas Flint-Hills District Tournament HS 2020-12-11 LD R2 216 150 Neg
SMS Novice HS 2020-10-03 Nov R2 Shawnee Mission East CK Washburn Rural BH AFF
SMS Novice HS 2020-10-03 Nov R1 Washburn Rural CR Shawnee Mission South TB AFF
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R9 N384 N311 Con Pro 2-1
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R9 N129 N230 Pro Pro 2-1
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R8 N223 N350 Con Con 2-1
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R8 N208 N259 Pro Pro 2-1
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R7 N137 N325 Pro Pro 3-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R7 N232 N149 Pro Con 2-1
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R5 N111 N293 Con Con 2-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R5 N272 N143 Pro Pro 2-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R4 N284 N112 Pro Pro 2-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R3 N347 N121 Pro Pro 2-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R3 N221 N338 Con Con 2-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R2 N258 N237 Pro Pro 2-0
National Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-06-12 PF R2 N300 N257 Con
ONW Forensics Invitational NIETOC HS 2020-03-06 LD R3 19 Aiden Basore 16 Annemarie Smith Neg
ONW Forensics Invitational NIETOC HS 2020-03-06 NLD R2 37 Ashton Woodring 31 Lucas Daniels Neg
ONW Forensics Invitational NIETOC HS 2020-03-06 LD R1 8 Farzad Janjua 12 Thomas Lushington Aff
The Milo Cup at Millard North HS 2020-02-21 PF Dubs BASIS Scottsdale WW Interlake Independent KS PRO PRO 3-0
The Milo Cup at Millard North HS 2020-02-21 PF R6 Hamilton Independent SS Southlake Carroll KM CON
The Milo Cup at Millard North HS 2020-02-21 PF R4 Lincoln GM Millard West KL CON
The Milo Cup at Millard North HS 2020-02-21 PFRR R3 Lakeville GN Lincoln East WL PRO
The Milo Cup at Millard North HS 2020-02-21 PF R3 Blake HP Newton South FC CON
The Milo Cup at Millard North HS 2020-02-21 PFRR R2 Hunter College Independent BX Lakeville GN CON
The Milo Cup at Millard North HS 2020-02-21 PFRR R1 Belvidere North MK Newton South SJ CON CON 2-0
The Milo Cup at Millard North HS 2020-02-21 PF R1 Dublin Jerome RK Lincoln East SC PRO
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2020-01-31 VPF O Flower Mound GM Plano West YN Pro Pro 2-1
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2020-01-31 VPF R5 Hebron KM Trinity BR Pro
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2020-01-31 VPF R5 Plano West KM Lansing SK Pro
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2020-01-31 VPF R4 Lovejoy LK Carroll Senior KM Con
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2020-01-31 VPF R4 Cabot FY Keller MG Pro
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2020-01-31 VPF R3 Flower Mound GM Carroll Senior QD Pro
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2020-01-31 VPF R3 Westwood FG Lovejoy MC Pro
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2020-01-31 VPF R2 Texas SY Cabot EM Pro
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational HS 2020-01-31 VPF R2 Plano West AW Centennial WB Pro
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 PF Octafi Harrisburg AO Lakeville GN Con Con 2-1
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 PF Double Ames HS Marist SV Con Con 3-0
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 PF R6 Edina MZ King BM Pro
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 PF R6 Norwalk PV West Des Moines Valley JW Con
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 PF R4 John F. Kennedy MR Millard North ZhRa Con
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 PF R4 Ankeny Centennial SS Norwalk BD Pro
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 PF R2 Watertown RT Lincoln CJ Pro
The Dowling Catholic Paradigm HS 2019-12-13 PF R2 BASIS Scottsdale WW Johnston HN Pro
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VPF Sextos Bronx Science MR Westlake DL Con Con 2-1
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VPF R7 Strake Jesuit HT Cinco Ranch RT Con
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VPF R7 McDowell BP Miami Beach Sr AU Pro
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VPF R6 Oakwood School - North Hollywood GM NSU RG Pro
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VPF R6 Seven Lakes RZ Blake PW Pro
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VPF R4 Phoenix Country Day KM Nova SS Pro
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2019-11-23 VPF R4 Durham HD Desert Vista GK Pro
Blue Valley West Invitational HS 2019-10-11 DCI R3 Shawnee Mission South Fritton & Kerrigan SMNW Fairchild & Marvine Neg
Blue Valley West Invitational HS 2019-10-11 DCI R2 Shawnee Mission West Wright & Wallenburg Shawnee Mission South Flassig Aff
Blue Valley West Invitational HS 2019-10-11 DCI R1 Shawnee Mission South Henderson & Tuohey Blue Valley Northwest Mojica & Xu Neg
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2017-11-03 VPF Quarte Dublin Jerome YZ Walt Whitman RT Con Con 3-0
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2017-11-03 VPF Octos Theodore Roosevelt GK Altamont ZC Con Con 3-0
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2017-11-03 VPF Double Evanston Twp CB Carroll HS - Southlake RM Pro Pro 2-1
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2017-11-03 VPF Triple Dougherty Valley KB John F. Kennedy HS, Cedar Rapids RP Pro Pro 2-1
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2017-11-03 VPF R6 Walt Whitman HF Columbus AP Pro
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2017-11-03 VPF R4 Chanhassen MW Theodore Roosevelt GM Pro
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate MS 2017-11-03 VPF R3 Blake GM Edina NI Pro
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2017-11-03 VPF R2 Strake Jesuit College Prep AJ Columbus MP Pro
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2017-11-03 VPF R1 Blake BJ Walt Whitman TG Pro
Valley Mid America Cup HS 2017-09-23 PF Quarte Johnston Bujimalla & Snyder Edina Santoni & Paradis Pro Pro 2-1
Valley Mid America Cup HS 2017-09-23 PF Octos Johnston Lucas & Silkin Edina Santoni & Paradis Con Con 2-1
Capitol Babson 2017-08-08 BABV R4 Dupey Dupey Zhu Alexandra Jing & Zoe Zhang Team Fried Rice Pearl Mallick & Aryan Pradhan Pro
Capitol Babson 2017-08-08 BABV R4 Emily's Mafia Seo-ho Lee & Kyle Troeger Emily's Mafia Felix Liu & Nicole Zhou Con
Capitol Babson 2017-08-08 BABV R3 Emily's Mafia Andy He & Iona Stephen Gavin's Posse Gilad Kestenberg & Benny Sun Con
Capitol Babson 2017-08-08 BABV R1 Emily's Mafia Fontaine Liu & Kevin Xiong Gavin's Posse Ysabella Ouyang & Gavin Pu Con
Capitol Babson 2017-08-08 BABV R1 Gavin's Posse Romano Tucci & Randy Wang Dupey Dupey Zhu Alexander Jin & Shizhong Xu Con
Middle School TOC hosted by UK HS 2017-05-13 PF Semis NSU University RS Harker RP Pro Con 2-1
Middle School TOC hosted by UK MS 2017-05-13 PF Quarte NSU University RS Ivy Bridge DP Con Pro 2-1
Middle School TOC hosted by UK HS 2017-05-13 PF Octas Mountain Brook CC Potomac Debate CT Pro Pro 2-1
Middle School TOC hosted by UK HS 2017-05-13 PF Runoff Capitol Debate NP Louisville-Independent TW Pro Con 2-1
Middle School TOC hosted by UK MS 2017-05-13 PF R6 Young Leaders BM Ivy Bridge DP Con
Middle School TOC hosted by UK HS 2017-05-13 PF R4 Capitol Debate JY Poly Prep Country Day GG Pro
Middle School TOC hosted by UK HS 2017-05-13 PF R2 Potomac Debate CT Ivy Bridge TW Con
Middle School TOC hosted by UK MS 2017-05-13 PF R1 Potomac Debate FG Success Academy Bed-Stuy Middle CD Pro
Tournament of Champions HS 2017-04-29 SPF Semi Millard North SN Hendrickson HV Pro Pro 3-0
Tournament of Champions HS 2017-04-29 SPF Qtr Millard North SN Saratoga AR Pro Pro 2-1
Tournament of Champions HS 2017-04-29 SPF Qtr Blake BM Hendrickson HV Con Con 3-0
Tournament of Champions HS 2017-04-29 PF Oct Colleyville Heritage LN Princeton BS Pro Pro 3-0
Tournament of Champions HS 2017-04-29 SPF Runoff Lake Highland Prep BF Strake Jesuit DD Pro Con 2-1
Tournament of Champions HS 2017-04-29 PF R6 Newton South AP Poly Prep Country Day SS Con
Tournament of Champions HS 2017-04-29 PF R4 Hawken LE Lincoln-Sudbury SW Con
Tournament of Champions HS 2017-04-29 SPF R3 Evanston Twp CC Montgomery Blair GH Con
National Debate Coaches Association National Championships HS 2017-04-08 PF Semis Lexington HL Blake LM Pro Con 2-1
National Debate Coaches Association National Championships HS 2017-04-08 PF R4 Blake LM Juan Diego Catholic VN Con
National Debate Coaches Association National Championships HS 2017-04-08 PF R3 Hendrick Hudson AB Logan SM Pro
National Debate Coaches Association National Championships HS 2017-04-08 PF R2 Juan Diego Catholic HB Lexington ZC Con
National Debate Coaches Association National Championships HS 2017-04-08 PF R2 Juan Diego Catholic VN Logan GV Pro
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 JVPF Finals Cypress Bay KN Flintridge Preparatory HJ Pro Pro 3-0
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 JVPF Semis Nova 42 TO Flintridge Preparatory HJ Pro Con 2-1
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF Octos Charles Flanagan SM Nueva SS Pro Pro 2-1
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF Double Dougherty Valley MR Charles Flanagan SM Con Con 3-0
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF Triple Cupertino GK Nueva CC Con Con 3-0
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF Triple James Logan SU Charles Flanagan SD Con Con 3-0
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF R6 College Prep GM Hamilton KG Pro
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF R6 Cherry Creek CG Presentation KN Con
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF R4 Dougherty Valley SQ Milpitas BJ Pro
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF R4 Harker LX La Salle CN Con
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF R2 College Prep DW Elko RW Pro
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF R2 Cypress Bay HS Los Altos SH Con
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF R1 Archbishop Mitty AN Presentation KM Con
Cal Invitational UC Berkeley HS 2017-02-18 VPF R1 Prep KL Leland LT Con
Barkley Forum for High Schools HS 2017-01-27 PF S Tuto Southlake Carroll PF Ardrey Kell HK Pro Pro 4-1
Barkley Forum for High Schools HS 2017-01-27 PF Q Tuto Poly Prep Country Day SS Ardrey Kell HK Con Con 2-1
Barkley Forum for High Schools HS 2017-01-27 PF OC Tut Colleyville Heritage NL Ft. Lauderdale HS Pro Pro 3-0
Barkley Forum for High Schools HS 2017-01-27 PF DO Tut Pinecrest SS Poly Prep Country Day SS Con Con 3-0
Barkley Forum for High Schools HS 2017-01-27 PF R2 Lovett MS StoneWall PB Con
Barkley Forum for High Schools HS 2017-01-27 PF R2 Strake Jesuit WH Delbarton SS Pro
Barkley Forum for High Schools HS 2017-01-27 PF R1 Lexington LH SpeakFirst JS Pro
Barkley Forum for High Schools HS 2017-01-27 PF R1 Oak Grove SW Altamont LP Pro
Ivy Street Round Robin HS 2017-01-25 PF R5 Colleyville Heritage Oxbridge Academy Aff Aff 2-0
Ivy Street Round Robin HS 2017-01-25 PF R4 Blake School Trinity Prep Neg
Ivy Street Round Robin HS 2017-01-25 PF R2 Southlake Carroll Marist Aff Aff 2-0
Ivy Street Round Robin HS 2017-01-25 PF R1 Durham Academy Ft. Lauderdale Neg Neg 2-0
Arizona St Hugh Downs School of Human Comm Invitational HS 2017-01-05 VPF Qrtrs Hawken DK La Salle NC Pro Pro 3-0
Arizona St Hugh Downs School of Human Comm Invitational HS 2017-01-05 NPF Octs Albuquerque RF Catalina Foothills LV Pro Pro 3-0
Arizona St Hugh Downs School of Human Comm Invitational HS 2017-01-05 VPF 3x Coronado BC Valor Christian KL Pro Pro 2-1
Arizona St Hugh Downs School of Human Comm Invitational HS 2017-01-05 NPF Octs Salpointe Catholic DT BASIS Scottsdale BI Con Con 3-0
Arizona St Hugh Downs School of Human Comm Invitational HS 2017-01-05 VPF 3x Dougherty Valley BK Westwood BS Con Pro 2-1
Arizona St Hugh Downs School of Human Comm Invitational HS 2017-01-05 VPF R6 Northridge HH Hamilton GK Con
Arizona St Hugh Downs School of Human Comm Invitational HS 2017-01-05 VPF R6 Mission San Jose SH Leland LH Con
Arizona St Hugh Downs School of Human Comm Invitational HS 2017-01-05 NPF R2 Scottsdale Prep PK Rancho CO Pro
John Edie Holiday Debates hosted by Blake HS 2016-12-16 PF Double Horace Mann SK Byram Hills UR Pro Pro 2-1
John Edie Holiday Debates hosted by Blake HS 2016-12-16 PF Triple James Madison Memorial VY Madison West HJ Pro Con 2-1
John Edie Holiday Debates hosted by Blake HS 2016-12-16 PF R6 Evanston Township BF Hopkins MS Con
John Edie Holiday Debates hosted by Blake HS 2016-12-16 PF R5 Poly Prep Country Day GM Madison West HJ Con
John Edie Holiday Debates hosted by Blake HS 2016-12-16 PFRR R5 Potomac TL James Madison Memorial VY Con Con 2-1
John Edie Holiday Debates hosted by Blake HS 2016-12-16 PF R3 Millburn BM Evanston Township TO Pro
John Edie Holiday Debates hosted by Blake HS 2016-12-16 PF R3 Madison West LL Walt Whitman GL Con
John Edie Holiday Debates hosted by Blake MS 2016-12-16 PFRR R1 DuPont Manual BH Blake GM Pro Pro 2-1
John Edie Holiday Debates hosted by Blake HS 2016-12-16 PF R1 University OM Homewood-Flossmoor SE Pro
John Edie Holiday Debates hosted by Blake HS 2016-12-16 PF R1 Delbarton SS Byram Hills CY Pro
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2016-12-09 LD Octo San Marino AN Chaminade CC Aff Aff 3-0
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2016-12-09 PF Double Carlsbad TV Menlo-Atherton NC Neg Aff 2-1
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2016-12-09 LD R5 San Marino AN Chaminade EP Aff
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2016-11-19 VPF Octas Stuyvesant PJ Hawken EL Pro Pro 2-1
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2016-11-19 VPF Sextos Nova AB North Allegheny Sr AX Pro Pro 3-0
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2016-11-19 VPF R7 Liberty AE Evanston Township JO Pro
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2016-11-19 VPF R7 Apple Valley BH McDowell SP Con
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2016-11-19 VPF R6 Cranbrook Upper CZ DuPont Manual BH Pro
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2016-11-19 VPF R6 Millburn BZ Middleton BS Pro
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2016-11-19 VPF R4 College Prep LK Stuyvesant RG Con
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament MS 2016-11-19 VPF R4 Blake GY American Heritage HS - Delray Beach KG Pro
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2016-11-03 VPF Octafi East Ridge BZ Eastview MD Pro Pro 3-0
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2016-11-03 VPF Double St Paul KK Walt Whitman MM Con Con 2-1
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate MS 2016-11-03 VPF Round St Paul AG Blake BM Pro
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2016-11-03 VPF Round Harrisburg PM Cannon Falls SF Pro
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2016-11-03 VPF Round Edina KI Madison West JK Pro
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate HS 2016-11-03 VPF Round Mission San Jose CK Eastview FU Pro
Claremont Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2016-10-22 PF Semi Riverside STEM GM Sage Hill LL Neg Neg 2-1
Claremont Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2016-10-22 PF Quar Riverside STEM KG Claremont DB Aff Aff 2-1
Claremont Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2016-10-22 PF R4 Riverside STEM VS Bonita Vista RP Neg
Claremont Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2016-10-22 PF R3 Riverside STEM GS I Poly BT Aff
Claremont Bargain Belt Invitational HS 2016-10-22 PF R1 Oxford TC Riverside STEM KG Neg
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational HS 2016-10-14 O PF Quarte Peninsula KJ La Salle CN Neg Neg 2-1
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational HS 2016-10-14 O PF R6 Independent Vikings SS University HS - Fresno LE Aff
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational HS 2016-10-14 M PF Quarte Capitol Debate JY Harker JD Neg Neg 2-1
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational MS 2016-10-14 M PF Quarte Autonomy Debate LY Magnet NS Neg Neg 2-1
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational HS 2016-10-14 O PF R6 Riverside STEM HS Peninsula ZH Neg
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational HS 2016-10-14 O PF R5 Del Mar Independent CC Peninsula LJ Aff
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational HS 2016-10-14 O PF R5 East Bakersfield QH Riverside STEM GA Neg
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational HS 2016-10-14 N PF R3 Riverside STEM YA Yucaipa Ma Neg
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational HS 2016-10-14 N PF R3 Troy JP Cambridge CS Neg
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational HS 2016-10-14 N PF R2 San Marino JG Riverside STEM AK Aff
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational HS 2016-10-14 N PF R2 Yucaipa GP Los Osos GD Aff
Grapevine Classic MS 2016-09-09 PFD Octafi Plano West Senior HH Blake GY Con Con 2-1
Grapevine Classic HS 2016-09-09 PFD Double Lake Highland Prep WH Edina KI Pro Pro 3-0
Grapevine Classic HS 2016-09-09 PFD Double Westwood SB Edina NT Pro Pro 2-1
Grapevine Classic MS 2016-09-09 PFD R5 Plano West Senior RJ Blake GY Con
Grapevine Classic HS 2016-09-09 PFD R4 Plano Senior MM Trinity Preparatory PT Con
Grapevine Classic HS 2016-09-09 PFD R4 Blake LM Kingwood GS Pro
Grapevine Classic HS 2016-09-09 PFD R2 Byron Nelson GH St Mary's Hall MM Con
Grapevine Classic MS 2016-09-09 PFD R2 Blake BM Plano Senior ZK Con
Grapevine Classic HS 2016-09-09 PFD R1 St. John's CF Kempner SS Pro
Grapevine Classic HS 2016-09-09 PFD R1 Southlake Carroll FP Edgemont BS Pro
Tournament of Champions HS 2016-04-30 PF Final Mission San Jose KW Pine View BS Pro Con 2-1
Tournament of Champions HS 2016-04-30 PF Oct Walt Whitman AA Poly Prep Country Day EH Con Pro 2-1
Tournament of Champions HS 2016-04-30 PF Runoff Mission San Jose KW Ft. Lauderdale HS Con Pro 2-1
Tournament of Champions HS 2016-04-30 PF R7 Pine View BS Horace Mann CM Pro
Tournament of Champions HS 2016-04-30 PF R5 Walt Whitman GK Hunter MM Con
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2016-04-09 PF Semi Lake Highland Prep OS Trinity Prep FP Pro Pro 2-1
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship MS 2016-04-09 PF Quarte Blake GY Lake Highland Prep FN Con Pro 2-1
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2016-04-09 PF R6 Southlake Carroll SC Presentation KC Con
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2016-04-09 PF R6 Ft. Lauderdale BM Southlake Carroll BM Con
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2016-04-09 PF R5 Lake Highland Prep FN Blake BM Pro
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2016-04-09 PF R5 Blake GY Marist HM Pro
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2016-04-09 PF R4 Ft. Lauderdale GH Oxbridge Academy of the Palm Beaches BL Pro
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2016-04-09 PF R4 Lake Highland Prep LG Lexington HC Con
Southern California NSDA District HS 2016-03-19 PF R6 AH Kim & Palmer AH Gibbs & Singh Aff
Cal Invitational at Berkeley HS Tournament HS 2016-02-13 VPF Quarte Miramonte GZ Nueva AT Con Con 3-0
Cal Invitational at Berkeley HS Tournament HS 2016-02-13 VPF Octos Oakwood School - North Hollywood BG St. Francis VD Pro Con 2-1
Cal Invitational at Berkeley HS Tournament HS 2016-02-13 VPF Double Dougherty Valley MG Colleyville Heritage NL Con Con 2-1
Cal Invitational at Berkeley HS Tournament HS 2016-02-13 VPF Triple St Francis BI Nueva PC Con Con 3-0
Cal Invitational at Berkeley HS Tournament HS 2016-02-13 VPF Triple Harker CL Peninsula GF Con Pro 2-1
Cal Invitational at Berkeley HS Tournament HS 2016-02-13 VPF R6 Cypress Bay WS Coppell HS Con
Cal Invitational at Berkeley HS Tournament HS 2016-02-13 VPF R6 Cypress Bay PP Plano West Senior HH Pro
2016 California Round Robin HS 2016-02-11 PF RR R7 Nueva AT Lake Highland Prep RO Con Con 2-0
2016 California Round Robin HS 2016-02-11 PF RR R6 Lamar Houston BV Presentation KM Pro Pro 2-0
2016 California Round Robin HS 2016-02-11 PF RR R6 Colleyville Heritage JS Lake Highland Prep RO Con Con 2-0
2016 California Round Robin HS 2016-02-11 PF RR R4 Dougherty Valley MJ Harker HL Con Con 2-0
2016 California Round Robin HS 2016-02-11 PF RR R1 Nueva CC Christopher Columbus AL Con Con 2-0
2016 California Round Robin HS 2016-02-11 PF RR R1 Harker JR Colleyville Heritage JS Pro Pro 2-0
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF Double Lake Highland Prep SN San Marino LW Pro Pro 3-0
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF Double Presentation KC Harker BC Con Con 3-0
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF Triple Sierra Canyon FK Presentation KC Con Con 3-0
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF R6 Harker KL Chaparral NS Pro
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF R6 American Heritage Plantation BB Mission San Jose WK Con
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF R5 Mission San Jose SH Harker KX Pro
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF R5 College Prep WW Mountain View MJ Pro
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF R4 Geneva School of Boerne GR Saratoga RK Con
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF R4 Saratoga RA Harker MP Pro
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF R3 College Prep DM Leland LV Pro
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF R3 Leland SC Dougherty Valley SK Con
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF R1 Amador Valley PK Harker JM Con
30th Annual Stanford Invitational HS 2016-01-16 VPF R1 Edgemont JrSr BS Harker HL Con
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2016-01-07 PFD R6 Salpointe Catholic CR Hamilton RW Con
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2016-01-07 PFD R6 Mission San Jose SP BASIS Chandler GZ Pro
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2016-01-07 PFD R5 Red Mountain GL Foothill BL Con
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2016-01-07 PFD R5 Catalina Foothills AC Northwest Career and Technical FG Pro
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2016-01-07 PFD R4 Harker WW Juan Diego Catholic WH Pro
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2016-01-07 PFD R4 La Cueva ZL Albuquerque MG Pro
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2016-01-07 PFD R2 West BT College Prep GJ Con
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2016-01-07 PFD R2 St. Francis DV Logan CS Pro
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2016-01-07 PFD R1 Northridge GO Juan Diego Catholic LV Con
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2016-01-07 PFD R1 Saratoga RK Green Valley PA Con
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF Semifi University FT Ardrey Kell BW Con Con 2-1
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF Double Newton South DS Millburn CP Pro Con 2-1
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF Triple Bronx Science FD Hawken EL Pro Con 2-1
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF R6 Horace Mann FR Middleton CY Pro
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF R5 Horace Mann Ma Eagan DM Pro
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF R5 Delbarton EG Middleton OB Pro
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF R4 Lake Highland Prep SN Brookfield East MB Pro
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF R4 Delbarton AH Eastview BL Pro
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF R3 Bronx Science AL Eastview HV Con
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF R3 Marist HM Walt Whitman MM Pro
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PFRR R3 Eagan DM Poly Prep Country Day HE Con Con 3-0
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PFRR R2 Walt Whitman LA Harker BC Pro Pro 2-1
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF R1 Harker BC Evanston BC Pro
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PFRR R1 Madison West BR University FM Con Con 2-1
John Edie Holiday Tournament Hosted by Blake HS 2015-12-18 PF R1 Horace Mann SS Clovis North OR Pro
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2015-12-04 PF Quar San Marino WL Green Valley PB Aff Aff 2-1
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2015-12-04 PF Octo Westview NP Coronado SY Neg Neg 2-1
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2015-12-04 PF Double Coronado SY San Marino CK Aff Aff 3-0
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2015-12-04 PF R6 Carlsbad BB Milpitas MS Neg
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2015-12-04 PF R6 Oakwood North Hollywood HR Canyon Crest LS Neg
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2015-12-04 PF R3 Archbishop Mitty GS Claremont DW Aff
La Costa Canyon Winter Classic HS 2015-12-04 PF R3 Westview KZ Leland BT Neg
The Glenbrooks HS 2015-11-21 PF Octas Nova AB Harker HL Con Con 2-1
The Glenbrooks HS 2015-11-21 PF Sextos Brookfield East BN Chanhassen PS Pro Pro 3-0
The Glenbrooks MS 2015-11-21 PF Sextos Colleyville Heritage LJ Blake GY Con Con 3-0
The Glenbrooks HS 2015-11-21 PF R5 Lake Highland Prep SN American Heritage Plantation HS Pro
The Glenbrooks MS 2015-11-21 PF R5 James Madison Memorial SK Blake GY Con
The Glenbrooks HS 2015-11-21 PF R3 Chesterton WJ North Allegheny AN Con
The Glenbrooks MS 2015-11-21 PF R1 William Fremd DA Blake AK Con
The Glenbrooks HS 2015-11-21 PF R1 James Madison Memorial PC Walt Whitman WW Con
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2015-10-16 PF Sexto- Hackley SF Hawken SM Con Pro 2-1
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2015-10-16 PF Runoff Newton South PS Horace Mann SK Con Con 3-0
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2015-10-16 PF R7 Walt Whitman AA Blake GY Pro
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2015-10-16 PF R7 Horace Mann CM Princeton TS Pro
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2015-10-16 PF R6 Summit CC Trinity CM Pro
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2015-10-16 PF R6 Walt Whitman MM Stuyvesant GJ Con
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2015-10-16 PF R5 Ridge GM Hunter College MM Con
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2015-10-16 PF R5 Freehold Townshipi EO Horace Mann OG Con
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2015-10-16 PF R4 Horace Mann MT James Madison Memorial VY Pro
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2015-10-16 PF R4 Regis BC Newton South UA Con
Yale Invitational HS 2015-09-18 PF Octos Regis AA American Heritage Plantation BB Con Con 3-0
Yale Invitational HS 2015-09-18 PF Dble-O Durham YD Ardrey Kell BW Con Con 3-0
Yale Invitational HS 2015-09-18 PF Rd. 6 Horace Mann CM Millburn BF Pro
Yale Invitational HS 2015-09-18 PF Rd. 6 Freehold Township Eg Trinity Prep FL Pro
Yale Invitational HS 2015-09-18 PF Rd. 5 Hackley BF Lake Highland Prep SN Con
Yale Invitational HS 2015-09-18 PF Rd. 5 Bronx Science BG West Point Grey OJ Pro
Yale Invitational HS 2015-09-18 PF Rd. 2 Poly Prep Country Day HE Durham LP Pro
Yale Invitational HS 2015-09-18 PF Rd. 2 Boston Latin YT McLean SB Pro
Yale Invitational HS 2015-09-18 PF Rd. 1 New Horizons DN CP Byram Hills WM Con
Yale Invitational HS 2015-09-18 PF Rd. 1 University RE Lake Highland Prep NL Con
Tournament of Champions HS 2015-04-25 PF Semi Stuyvesant UK Ridge OT Pro Con 2-1
Tournament of Champions HS 2015-04-25 PF Oct University HC Stuyvesant UK Con Con 2-1
Tournament of Champions MS 2015-04-25 PF R7 Blake BG George Washington CQ Pro
Tournament of Champions HS 2015-04-25 PF R5 Westwood AX Princeton PY Pro
Tournament of Champions HS 2015-04-25 PF R4 Stuyvesant UK Horace Mann HM Pro
Tournament of Champions HS 2015-04-25 PF R1 Walt Whitman WW Eagan DM Pro
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2015-04-12 PF Semi Poly Prep Country Day EH Harker BR Pro Pro 2-1
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2015-04-12 PF Quarte Blake BG Bronx Science DB Con Pro 2-1
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2015-04-12 PF R5 Presentation KM Byram Hills MR Con
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2015-04-12 PF R2 Bronx Science FD Poly Prep Country Day EH Con
National Debate Coaches Association National Championship HS 2015-04-12 PF R1 Lexington MC Bronx Science GK Con
UPenn Liberty Bell Classic HS 2015-02-14 PF R8 Bishop O'Dowd WY Myers Park KM Con Con 2-1
UPenn Liberty Bell Classic HS 2015-02-14 PF R6 Hendrick Hudson AB Hill KS Pro
UPenn Liberty Bell Classic HS 2015-02-14 PF R5 Upper Merion RT Bronx Science CF Con
UPenn Liberty Bell Classic HS 2015-02-14 PF R1 McLean CW Bronx Science HX Pro
UPenn Liberty Bell Classic HS 2015-02-14 PF R1 Livingston EH Bronx Science KM Con
2015 Golden Desert Debates HS 2015-01-31 PF R6 Green Valley PR BASIS Scottsdale MK Pro
2015 Golden Desert Debates HS 2015-01-31 PF R6 Chaminade CP LJ Harker WW Pro
2015 Golden Desert Debates HS 2015-01-31 PF R5 Advanced Technologies FM Albuquerque MF Con
2015 Golden Desert Debates HS 2015-01-31 PF R5 Juan Diego Catholic LP Coronado YS Pro
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2015-01-08 PFD 2x Presentation JS Harker WB Con Con 3-0
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2015-01-08 PFD 2x Desert Vista FS Mission San Jose KS Con Con 2-1
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2015-01-08 PFD R6 Foothill AH Brophy CP GR Pro
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2015-01-08 PFD R6 Northwest Career and Technical BC Salpointe Catholic GG Con
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2015-01-08 PFD R5 Mesquite OS Harker LJ Pro
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2015-01-08 PFD R5 Albuquerque MH Hamilton MG Con
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2015-01-08 PFD R4 Hamilton Ki Sky View FC Pro
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2015-01-08 PFD R4 Northwest Career and Technical MM Chaparral PR Con
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2015-01-08 PFD R3 Lone Peak ZL Catalina Foothills AC Con
Southwest Championship at Arizona State HS 2015-01-08 PFD R3 Hamilton SB Juan Diego Catholic AL Con
John Edie Holiday Tournament at Blake HS 2014-12-19 PF Double Poly Prep Country Day AA Marist AT Pro Pro 3-0
John Edie Holiday Tournament at Blake HS 2014-12-19 PF R6 Manchester Essex DE Oxbridge Academy of the Palm Beaches ST Con
John Edie Holiday Tournament at Blake HS 2014-12-19 PF R6 Walt Whitman JS Western CD Con
John Edie Holiday Tournament at Blake HS 2014-12-19 PF R4 Walt Whitman DH Evanston Township AC Pro
John Edie Holiday Tournament at Blake HS 2014-12-19 PF R4 Bronx Science GD Millard West BC Pro
New York City Invitational HS 2014-10-16 PF R7 Summit LR Princeton AM Con
New York City Invitational HS 2014-10-16 PF R7 University LE Lake Mary Prep WL Pro
New York City Invitational HS 2014-10-16 PF R5 Ridge GS Capitol Debate SB Pro
New York City Invitational HS 2014-10-16 PF R5 Lake Highland BS Princeton MO Pro
New York City Invitational HS 2014-10-16 PF R2 Harker CH Ridge OJ Con
New York City Invitational HS 2014-10-16 PF R1 DuPont Manual KS George Washington CO MZ Con
New York City Invitational HS 2014-10-16 PF R1 Nightingale Bamford Co Trinity LR Pro
The Nichols Invitational at Harker HS 2014-09-27 VAR R5 Mission San Jose WS Nueva PP Con
The Nichols Invitational at Harker HS 2014-09-27 VAR R3 Presentation KM St. Francis KT Con
The Nichols Invitational at Harker HS 2014-09-27 VAR R2 Milpitas CL Presentation CN Con