Amrit Sharma
Paradigm Statement
Last changed 14 February 2022 1:02 PM PDT3rd year on the Circuit
Add me to the email chain: 2005amrit@gmail.com
Tech > Truth (You can win an argument saying that the 1 + 1 = 3 if your opponent does not respond to it, I believe doing anything otherwise is judge intervention)
I require speech docs to be sent before constructive and rebuttal speeches
Frontline all offense in second rebuttal and defense on the arg ur going for (by all means frontline everything I think its a good strat)
Summary should extend defense
When you are extending responses on your opponents case please interact with their frontlines otherwise you're just wasting time.
No new weighing in second FF, very minimal new weighing allowed in First FF
IMPACT CALCULUS: this is what wins you debates. If you clearly explain to me and give warrants as to why your impacts matter more than your opponents, you're much more likely to win if they don't. Some common mechanisms include Probability, Magnitude etc.
Speaks:
+1 if you read cut cards in case
Auto 30 if you read straight from cut cards in both rebuttal and case
Progressive:
Shells:
Familiar with most (Paraphrasing, Disclosure, TW) , I can't judge a full fledged theory debate nearly as well as others so run at your own risk
Kritiques:
Can't judge them feel free to run at your own risk i will try my best, read a ROTB
Other:
Be respectful
Have Fun!