I have been a coach for 7 years at Campbell Hall School in California. I'm a traditional-style judge that will vote on the flow. Many would call me a "flay judge" - flow leaning. Truth over tech.

Speech Requirements:

- 2nd rebuttal does not need to frontline (although it is strategic)

- Summary must extend all offense (collapse tactically)

- 1st summary should extend important defense even if it not frontlined in 2nd rebuttal

- WEIGH and tell me the story of the round in Final Focus

Things that are important for me:

- Signposting

- Clarity (please slow down when reading author names)

- Creating a strong, nuanced narrative

I do not want you to:

- Spread - I will not flow it

- Read trigger warning or disclosure theory or barely there links to nuke war/extinction

- Miscut evidence (I will call for essential cards even if not challenged to evaluate quality)

I will vote on Ks and theory only if there is a substantial abuse. If you have any other questions feel free to ask me before the round.