Jax Rounds Paradigm

Last changed 30 January 2021 1:29 AM PDT

Last edited 1/30/2021.

2020 Important Notice:

I graduated from Notre Dame High School in 2017 and have been 3 years entirely removed from debate. During my senior year at ND my partner Mikaela Appleby and I qualified to the TOC with 7 bids. Therefore, I while I know about debate structure and what constitutes a fully formed argument, I know little about this year's topic. So with that being said, make sure to extra-explain concepts or acronyms that are specific to this year's topic.

I've judged roughly about 25 rounds on this topic so far in the year.

My virtual debating policies:

You do not need to turn on your webcam! It is entirely up to you and I understand why some people my refrain for various reasons.

Technology never works when we need it to, I understand that. That being said, you should be taking active steps to ensure the speed and reliability of your computer when debating. That means:

-Completely shutting down and restarting your computer every now and then. If it's been a week since you last did this, that's why it's really slow.

-Having a lot of tabs open is a HUGE drain on your computer's speed. ESPECIALLY, if you're running google chrome. Close out of as many tabs as you can. If you have an older computer, I would recommend switching to a different browser like firefox (not sure if it's NSDA Campus compatible, you should check) as it is less demanding on the hardware of your computer.

-If you have a little extra money, invest in an ethernet cord if your computer has the ability to take one. A wired connection is infinitely more reliable than a wireless one.

IMPORTANT - due to the nature of virtual debate including lag spikes, or moments of being unable to hear the person speaking, I am far far less likely to vote on quick 5 second theory arguments that go completely dropped. I'm willing to blame the drop on poor video/audio quality. If you'd still like to run arguments like aspec or fiat bad yada yada, devote at least 10 seconds into it and have the analytics in the speech doc.

If you are a first year debater:

If you are a first year debater, read the arguments you are most comfortable with, regardless of what anything else in this paradigm says.

Above all else I want you to talk about what you know the most! I want to see good, clear arguments.

An argument is a claim, followed by an explanation of the claim, followed by some data to back it up.

You should try your best to stay organized, responding to your opponents' arguments in a "line-by-line" fashion.

Have fun! And if you have any questions before the round please don't be afraid to ask me.

Ethics things:

I love the activity and if you're in it I think you're doing something valuable with your time. Which, means that you should do your best to include everybody in the community and be a good person overall. If you start being a jerk during the debate, and it gets excessive, I will step in and I will drop your speaks. Be polite y'all, it isn't too difficult!

I will not vote on "death good", I urge you to consider the effects of the argument in a high school environment where you are blissfully unaware of the mental health of other students in the activity.

General:

You do you as long as you can explain it.

Tech > Truth

When it comes to topic areas I know the most about, those would be heg, climate, the security k, and Agamben. I have no idea how relevant those are this year, but if you're able to go for any of these arguments those are my favorite debates to judge!

Nontraditional affs:

I am sympathetic to framework generally speaking and believe that debate at it's core is a game with little out-of-round "real world" impact, but:

At the least aff's should defend some form of the resolution, and have an advocacy statement (not necessarily the usfg). Affs that make broad statements about bad stuff happening without a mechanism or explanation for resolving the bad stuff are generally bland debates and leave the neg with no non-offensive ground.

That being said don't be scared of reading your usual k aff, I will happily vote on it as long as you explain it to me. The most work you will need to do is explaining to me why my ballot actually means something.

Non-usfg k affs don't usually get to perm the k unless they explain to me why they do.

Case debate:

Love it. It's underused unfortunately, so if you do a great job at getting into the "nitty-gritty" details of what the aff actually does and how it does or does not solve, I will reward you with speaker points accordingly.

It is possible to win a zero risk of the aff and I will vote on presumption if the case debate is good enough.

Topicality/Theory:

Meh....I'm not a fan of it, I just don't find theoretical debates very interesting. I do however, understand the value of them. This means that if you have the ability to win on substance, you should probably just go for substance.

Slow down for the love of all that is holy when reading your theory blocks, because like most people, my hand can only write so fast.

Condo is good in moderation - the neg should probably get 1 k and one 1 cp, anything more than that leaves me open to condo bad being an acceptable argument...But it doesn't mean I'll vote on it unless the "abuse" seems clear.

The quality of process/consult/conditions cp's is determined by how good the ev is. If anything I lean more neg than aff on these due to being a 2n.

Framework:

I lean neg on this question.

Explain to me what abuse has occurred, and why it has become impossible or unfair to be neg.

The argument should not be focused on the "content" of the 1ac, but rather that the way in which that their mechanism for doing so isn't T, and thats what makes it impossible to debate them.

Fairness is an impact.

Debate is probably a game.

Disads:

I love me some evidence comparison. The less reading of your evidence I have to do after the round, the better. Tell me what your ev says and why it's better than what their ev says.

Counterplans:

These are great, I love them.

Solvency advocates are important, if the aff sufficiently points out that the neg doesn't really have one, the cp goes away easily.

Kritiks:

Kritiks I like are: Security, Agamben, Foucault, legalism, cap, consumption, and university. Which, isn't a very extensive or diverse list really. I have my niche of k's that I like, if you read one of those you can assume I have a bit of knowledge about it and can change how you argue about it accordingly. If its not on this list, I may have heard it, and if I have, my understanding of it will be on a very shallow level. So please be sure to give good explanations particularly in cx as to what the k actually means.

Links should be specific. You should explain why what the aff has done is uniquely bad and causes X impact to occur. I have a high threshold for the link debate.

The alt should mean something. Its the weakest part of the debate which I know from experience, so invest time into telling me what it means to vote neg, what the world of the alternative looks like, and how it resolves the impact to the 1ac and the k.

Good Luck and have fun!

(If you're stressing out: http://i.imgur.com/KZf5kWZ.gifv)

Note - this was probably a terrible paradigm and you might still have a question about the way I view debate. Please feel free to ask me before the round starts. Alternatively, if after the debate you have further questions give them to your coach and have your coach reach out to me.

J.D.C.

Full Judging Record

Tournament Lv Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
Heart of Texas HS 2021-02-27 NCX R6 Damien GP Jesuit FH Neg
Heart of Texas HS 2021-02-27 NCX R4 Jesuit LM Damien TS Aff
Heart of Texas HS 2021-02-27 NCX R3 Barstow SS Jesuit GC Aff
Heart of Texas HS 2021-02-27 NCX R2 Univ Of Chicago Lab SK Montgomery Bell MT Neg
Heart of Texas HS 2021-02-27 NCX R1 Little Rock Central ML LOGYC KD Neg
Crestian Policy Classic HS 2021-02-13 NOV R4 St Mark's Schoo PH Glenbrook South CA Neg
Crestian Policy Classic HS 2021-02-13 NOV R2 Alpharetta AB Glenbrook North PH Aff
Crestian Policy Classic HS 2021-02-13 NOV R1 Glenbrook North PH Glenbrook South AR Neg
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2021 HS 2021-01-30 NCX PlatSe Montgomery Bell JG Glenbrook South AC Neg Neg 3-0
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2021 HS 2021-01-30 NCX R5 Glenbrook South SY Branson BL Aff
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2021 HS 2021-01-30 NCX R4 Casady HW Montgomery Bell BT Neg
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2021 HS 2021-01-30 NCX R3 Damien CP Carmel Valley CJ Neg
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2021 HS 2021-01-30 NCX R2 Montgomery Bell GB Damien AS Aff
Golden Desert Debate Tournament at UNLV 2021 HS 2021-01-30 NCX R1 CK McClatchy BG Pine Crest GM Neg
Peninsula Invitational HS 2021-01-23 O CX Quar Rowland Hall HS Chelmsford ML Aff Neg 2-1
Peninsula Invitational HS 2021-01-23 O CX Octo Damien HL Rowland Hall HS Neg Neg 3-0
Peninsula Invitational HS 2021-01-23 O CX R2 Downtown Magnets AM Damien DT Neg
Peninsula Invitational HS 2021-01-23 O CX R1 Chelmsford ML Elizabeth Learning Center HA Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 NCX R5 Univ Of Chicago Lab BC Westwood KS Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 NCX R4 Berkeley Prep RR Liberal Arts and Science BL Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 NCX R3 Lansing UH Univ Of Chicago Lab KW Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 NCX R2 Oak Park and River Forest CC Blue Valley North AV Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 NCX R1 Crossings Christian VM New Trier DM Neg
Damus Hollywood Invitational HS 2020-11-07 NCX Rd4 Damien BC Meadows DS Neg
Damus Hollywood Invitational HS 2020-11-07 NCX Rd3 Damien GP Meadows GT Aff
Damus Hollywood Invitational HS 2020-11-07 WSD Rd3 Polytechnic DMFS Blake Green Prop
Damus Hollywood Invitational HS 2020-11-07 NCX Rd2 College Prep JT Meadows DHN Aff
Damus Hollywood Invitational HS 2020-11-07 WSD Rd2 Blake Blue Sage Hill JJZM Opp
Damien Chuck Ballingall Memorial Invitational Virtual Edition HS 2020-10-03 O Pol Quar Gulliver Prep LR Meadows RW Aff Aff 2-1
Damien Chuck Ballingall Memorial Invitational Virtual Edition HS 2020-10-03 JVPOL R4 Damien Stephen Lewis & Fletcher Jones CK McClatchy Leo Abramsky-Sze & Maya Lee Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O CX Doub Valley International Prep AU Interlake PC Aff Aff 2-1
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O CX R6 Westminster YL St George's RC Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O CX R5 Lowell ST Bellarmine CR Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O CX R4 Bravo KG Peninsula RY Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O CX R3 Northwood AH Port of Los Angeles GR Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O CX R2 Valley International Prep AU Peninsula CD Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O CX R1 Peninsula LL West HS SLC ML Aff
Damus Hollywood Invitational and USC Round Robin HS 2016-11-03 NCX Semis College Prep JR Rowland Hall-St. Mark's DC Neg Neg 3-0
Damus Hollywood Invitational and USC Round Robin HS 2016-11-03 NCX R4 Rowland Hall-St. Mark's AG San Dieguito QO Aff
Damus Hollywood Invitational and USC Round Robin HS 2016-11-03 NCX R3 Chaminade CP LM Damien BT Neg
Damus Hollywood Invitational and USC Round Robin HS 2016-11-03 NCX R1 Meadows LN Rowland Hall-St. Mark's DC Neg
Roosevelt Elementary Spring Invitational 2015-05-12 PF R3 Eastman Santos & Banvelos Eastman Camarena & Ulteras Neg
Roosevelt Elementary Spring Invitational HS 2015-05-12 PF R2 Eastman Esquivel & Aceituno Nova 42 Kang & Wilson Neg
Roosevelt Elementary Spring Invitational HS 2015-05-12 PF R1 Wilshire Lee & Nam Nova 42 Agarwal & Ho Neg