add me to the chain: firstname.lastname@example.org
Tech over truth
K - don't read a high theory K, I can judge others but I prefer not to
DA - contextualize links, do impact comparison, etc.
CP - i like process/consult/agent CP's, but i like CP's that recut 1AC evidence better. Condo is prolly good but don't go crazy
T - use standards as DA's to their C/I, recutting interps is always persuasive, have case lists
I am fine with speed but you need to prioritize clarity
From the novice debates I've judged, my main comments always center around rebuttal decisionmaking. both the aff and neg must determine the most strategic off-case(s)/arguments to go for, make choices, and have ballot framing! put yourself in my shoes and think about what I will vote on. This not only makes it easier for me (as a judge), but if executed properly, I will reward you with higher speaks. The more warrants you give, the higher speaks I give. If they drop an argument you still need to explain it.
Most of my views align with my wonderful coach, Christina Phillips.