Esme Longley Paradigm

Last changed 15 October 2021 9:17 AM EDT

Hello! I am Esme. I debated PF for Durham for 4 years and I’m attending McGill. I use she/her pronouns. really dislike blippy arguments, but I guess I'll evaluate them, I'll just give them a LOT less weight. no warrant = VERY LOW CHANCE OF ME VOTING OFF IT. like near 0.

Ask me questions before round, I don't mind (I know sometimes there's not enough time to read paradigms). Also, please let me know (send me an email/ tell me in round) how I can accommodate this round to make you the most comfortable!

Also please include both members of a partnership. Talking about "carries" and excluding someone who has taken their time to put work into and be somewhere sucks a lot and often hits people already left out of debate the hardest. In round and out, make sure you're acknowledging and supporting work put in from everyone and reaching out to everyone as well. <3

Also don't call speeches "bad" ex: "their summary was really bad" just point out the flaws in it. ex: "they don't extend a warrant/ they never weigh..." etcetcetc

Sexism/ racism/ homophobia/ harassment/ etc. isn't cool. I will drop you and you will get low speaks.

Specifically for the debate, though, here are my preferences:

1. WARRANT AND IMPLICATE ARGUMENTS - by this I mean go one step further to explain your arguments -- tell me why A leads to B and B leads to C and WHY IT MATTERS. IF AN ARG HAS NO WARRANT, I PROBABLY WILL NOT VOTE OFF IT Don't just say "Medicare for All equals less money for pharma companies", explain why (and why it matters) : warranting ex - "under Medicare for All, the government negotiates down the prices of drugs with pharma companies, cutting into their profits". Implication might be - "pharma has less cash for R&D". It doesn't even have to be wordy lol just tell me why your arg is happening and why it matters. I also love warranting for uniqueness in case (People seem to forget to do this often). Essentially, the more you can give me earlier in the round, the stronger your arg will be.

2. WEIGH YOUR ARGUMENTS - even if you're losing 2/3 of your arguments, if your 1/3 is more important than theirs', the round is not lost! Tell me why I ought to care about that 1/3 and why it's more important than anything else. I will evaluate what you tell me, so if you tell me poverty is more important than climate change and give me sound reasons why and it doesn't go touched/ responded to with warrants, then I will buy it no matter my personal beliefs. You don't want to take a chance and let me do the weighing for you. You have control over where I vote, you just have to do the work and tell me why. On the other side, even if you're winning your arguments, WEIGH! You can tell me that your argument is more probable or has more warranting or has a larger impact, etc. just do the work.

Also, don't just say "we outweigh on magnitude" go further -- explain how, and (preferably) tell me why it matters

Also metaweigh pleaseeeee (if they're talking about their argument being more probable and you're talking about yours being having a larger magnitude tell me why magnitude matters more than probability!!). I LOVE good metaweighing, it makes me so so happy. I also love pre-emptive metaweighing, so tbh as soon as you introduce weighing, ideally I'd love for it to be metaweighed. (i reward hella for it - check the speaks stuff at the end)

If you haven't ever heard about weighing, I will teach you before round, just ask me please. I'd much rather take 5-10 mins to explain it and have a good round than dive into a messy round with no weighing

3. SIGNPOST

i'm happy as long as you let me know when you're moving on to different parts of the arg. ex: "on their link" suffices for signposting.

4. CALLING FOR CARDS AND EVIDENCE ETHICS - Call for cards if something feels sketchy if u want, I don't care how many you call for, it's your prep time. If you find something, point it out in the next speech. I'll call for contested evidence later on if it's relevant, but feel free to remind me. If you don't call for something sketchy, then that's on you (oof), I'll have to consider it even if I don't want to. Sometimes I'll call for a card after the round just because I'm curious, but that shouldn't factor into my decision and usually I only call for ev that's disputed.

As for evidence ethics, I'm totally fine with paraphrasing, but if you powertag or misconstrue evidence, I'm going to be really upset and you will know in your speaks. As a debater, I took evi ethics really seriously. Ev exists for anything, you just have to find it. Also indicts don't mean game over, they're like any other arg, respond, weigh, etc.

5. COLLAPSE - This is SO underrated. You start with 2x 4 minute speeches of args on the topic, then get 4 more minutes. The round can't contain all these args in a 2 minute final focus. I don't want it to. I don't want it to in summary, and often even in second rebuttal! I want you to collapse! Pick strategic arguments and (frontline any offense on them first obviously/ weigh against) but drop the ones that aren't as strategic. Just do the weighing and don't forget/ abandon an arg you drop.

Ultimately, you get control over the ballot, I want to do the least amount of intervention possible as your judge so it is on you to make this a clean round!:)

6. EXTEND - uh this should maybe be obvious but here are my thoughts on this. Obv you can drop case, but if you do make sure you weigh against / frontline offense they put on it and have some sorta independent offense/ default neg/aff strat

IF YOU EXTEND YOU NEED THESE PARTS OF THE ARG FOR IT TO BE A FULL EXTENSION - UNIQUENESS/ LINK/ INTERNAL LINK(S)/ IMPACT (TERMINALISED) if parts of your arg are missing, I will be MUCH less likely to vote on it. If both teams don't have parts of their args, then,,, uh,,,, i'll be uncomfy and stress out about my decision lots and probably look for the path of least resistance. Please don't put me in that situation

You DON'T NEED TO EXTEND CARD NAMES, I'm fine with analysis as long as all the parts of the arg are there. Of course, you're welcome to extend cards, but I find it takes a lot longer and doesn't add much unless you're doing specific evidence weighing. Also, please weigh your extensions! Including turns, like why does your link overpower theirs?

ON PROGRESSIVE ARGS

I believe that prog args are a way to change the debate space and make it a better place for us. This means a) I'm really uncomfortable voting off "friv theory", especially run on opponents who don't know how to handle it, so if it feels like your theory is an EZ path to the ballot to trip up an opponent, I'll usually try not to evaluate it as much as other arguments. basically, the more friv the theory is, the more u need to make sure ur opponents are ok with it. i know that sounds super objective, i'm sorry, but rounds where high level varsity teams who have the privilege of going to camp and resources run theory on teams who don't have those resources are unfair and make me uncomfortable. BUT WITH THAT BEING SAID - b) if there's something that makes the space unsafe/ a violation of something u think is important and you explain that in your theory, progressive args are fine with me. I never ran Ks/ theory as a debater, but I get how they work and can evaluate them, just explain them well ofc. if you're unsure if the thing u wanna read theory on is friv or not, feel free to ask me, i really dont mind.

i dont like tricks much

I'll evaluate RVIs if you want to read them, but u have to warrant why im evaluating them ofc. I'll eval competing interps and responses to "must have competing interps". I'll eval paraphrase theory LMAO but I don't like it! I disagree!!! Paraphrasing good. Anyway.

Other notes

I think every debater should watch this video.

If you're reading an argument about a sensitive topic, please read a content warning. Personally, I'd prefer if these were done anonymously thru a google form or another anon method so you don't have to put the burden on your opponents to ~expose~ themselves if that makes sense.

Put me on the email chain please! You don't have to shake my hand. Please preflow before the round. You can flip without me. Pls give me an offtime roadmap if you can!! won't penalise u if u don't tho! Wear what ur comfortable in.

I presume neg, I guess, but if default neg is part of your strat, prolly include a line of warranting cuz i will be uncomfy otherwise

Analysis> ev if there's an unresolved clash.

Defense isn't sticky, but I give some leniency to first summary speakers, cuz obviously it's impossible to have perfect coverage otherwise.

Second rebuttal should frontline offense, and I'd PREFER it if it frontlined defense, but like,, it's up to u. The later things come, the less weight I give them.

I am tech > truth but obv no one is tabula rasa. I'll vote off what's on the flow like nuke war or LONG link chains if you win them. I wanna evaluate what you give me with as little intervention as possible, so I'll try and stay out of how I feel about it lol unless it's really problematic. idk what then.

I'm okkkkkkk with second rebuttal offensive overviews but i don't love them and if you wanna call it abusive, I'll evaluate that too. Although, ngl I'd like it if you actually respond to it as well. Grouping responses is excellent. I'll give you some leniency, sure cuz time skew.

I hateeee blippy and unwarranted responses. Like, yeah, I'll flow and eval them, but I will give them a LOT less weight. You can go fast I'm down and cool with that, that doesn't mean you get to leave out parts of an arg though:( that makes me v sad. Don't go fast without explaining/ implicating pls.

calling me "judge" is annoying

Please send me a speech doc @ esmeslongley@gmail.com if you want to spread. I can handle most pf-speed ok, but I might miss something. If I miss something, I'll probably just ask you to clarify when you're done speaking or ask for a doc, but that's not an invite for you to go really fast and hope that I'll do the clarifying.

I won't time you, but I'll stop flowing after a bit if your opponents hold up their timer and it's obvious you're over time. Don't abuse it.

Pls don't postround me, but please do ask me questions if you have any!!

Fun stuff

I will give extra speaks (+.2 each) if you

- call turns "no you"s (+.1 per signposted "no you")

- Make me laugh (especially with puns, especially spontaneous ones)

- Reference Beyond Resolved

- Auto 30 if you make a Minecraft arg. Like not an analogy, a full blown Minecraft-based argument.

- auto 29.7 if u metaweigh decently with warrants and i'll boost it if ur phenomenal

- +.4 If you tell me your Subway Surfer's high score and it's higher than mine

- Reference Nick Miller from New Girl/ any1 from BBC's Merlin/ kate bush (I LOVE HERRRR)

- If our star signs are compatible - just tell me urs before round and i'll KNOW.

- Auto 30 if you rhyme your entire case

- Auto-boost to a 29.5 + if you Rhyme 25 seconds or so of your speech?

Don't worry, though. I'm pretty easy on speaks and usually give around a 28+. I'm personally not the prettiest speaker, so I totally get it and that shouldn't be a point of stress. More importantly, people get marginalised by the speaks system in ableist/ xenophobic / etc. ways.

I will take off speaks (-.1) for

- Unnecessary obnoxiousness (basically, if you're very mean. Joking around is totally fine lol)

- If our star signs are incompatible

- If your Subway Surfers score is lower than mine, I'll take off .1 points and I will automatically lose all respect for you.

I love debate this makes me happy. Have fun. Ask me if you have questions before or after the round!!

Full Judging Record

Tournament Lv Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2021-10-15 PFV R6 La Salle SS Delbarton PN Pro
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2021-10-15 PFV R4 Edina EJ Nueva MZ Con
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2021-10-15 PFV R3 St John's JL Foothill AD Con
New York City Invitational Debate and Speech Tournament HS 2021-10-15 PFV R1 Edina SB Newton South BS Pro
Tournament of Champions HS 2021-04-17 PFS Double Evergreen Valley SG Millburn WH Con Con 3-0
Tournament of Champions HS 2021-04-17 PFS Runoff Carmel Valley GZ Hawken BT Con Pro 2-1
46th University of Pennsylvania Tournament HS 2021-02-11 PF-V Double Lambert MY Thomas S. Wootton DR Con Con 2-1
46th University of Pennsylvania Tournament HS 2021-02-11 PF-V R6 Milton CH BASIS Scottsdale DS Con
46th University of Pennsylvania Tournament HS 2021-02-11 PF-V R5 Hunter KG University LQ Con
46th University of Pennsylvania Tournament HS 2021-02-11 PF-V R4 Riverdale Country KB Southlake Carroll MR Con
46th University of Pennsylvania Tournament HS 2021-02-11 PF-V R2 Unionville KQ Science Leadership Academy-Center City SS Pro
Harvard Round Robin HS 2021-02-11 PFRR R3 Bethesda Chevy Chase GT Charlotte Latin IS Aff
Harvard Round Robin HS 2021-02-11 PFRR R1 Westlake LY Lakeville South GN Neg
The Princeton Classic MS 2020-12-03 NPF R6 Del Mar Montessori LS Chaminade BM Con
The Princeton Classic HS 2020-12-03 NPF R5 Chaminade CK West Windsor Plainsboro South LG Con
The Princeton Classic HS 2020-12-03 NPF R4 Abbotsford Christian KO BCAcademy KK Con
The Princeton Classic HS 2020-12-03 NPF R3 Monta Vista JK Trinity BH Pro
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF Quarte Flintridge Prep VZ Hawken WaMa Pro Con 2-1
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF Octas Park City EP NSU FR Con Con 3-0
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF R5 Westlake YL Cranbrook BL Pro
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF R4 Dalton SY BASIS San Antonio Shavano JS Pro
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF R3 East Ridge BM Mission San Jose DK Con
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF R2 Dalton MH Oakwood CM Con
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament HS 2020-11-21 VPF R1 Park City BO Valencia NP Con
Seattle Academy Invitational HS 2020-11-06 OPF Semifi Roosevelt Ekmecic & Eslamy Masters Ratan & Cowin Con Con 3-0
Seattle Academy Invitational HS 2020-11-06 OPF Quarte Mount Si Abramson & Jaffery James Madison Memorial Liu & Sathish Con Con 2-1
Seattle Academy Invitational HS 2020-11-06 OPF R6 West Windsor Plainsboro South Ghosh & Zola Newport Lei & Kim Con
Seattle Academy Invitational MS 2020-11-06 OPF R6 Eastlake Vasisht & Khawand Blake Khan & Zhang Con
Seattle Academy Invitational HS 2020-11-06 NPF R5 Mount Si Khan & Silverman West Windsor Plainsboro South Wong & Telang Con
Seattle Academy Invitational HS 2020-11-06 NPF R4 West Windsor Plainsboro South Nabi & Davanam Roosevelt Thompson & Thielke Con
Seattle Academy Invitational HS 2020-11-06 NPF R4 VDA - Vancouver Yang & Moon Roosevelt Pettis & Herzog Con
Seattle Academy Invitational HS 2020-11-06 OPF R3 BASIS San Antonio Shavano Somawardana & Jakatimath Masters Ratan & Cowin Con
Seattle Academy Invitational HS 2020-11-06 OPF R3 Bellevue Choi & Sun Overlake Chummun & Vank Con
Seattle Academy Invitational HS 2020-11-06 NPF R2 VDA - Vancouver Liu & Mangat Gig Harbor Coovert & Talen Pro
Seattle Academy Invitational HS 2020-11-06 NPF R2 Interlake Zhang & Li West Windsor Plainsboro South Shaw & Nagabhairava Pro
Florida Blue Key Round Robin HS 2020-10-29 PF R3 AandM Consolidated SD Ransom Everglades GM Pro Pro 2-0
Nano Nagle Classic Formerly Voices HS 2020-10-05 PF Double Leland WT Harker XW Aff Aff 3-0
Nano Nagle Classic Formerly Voices HS 2020-10-05 PF Triple Archbishop Mitty MB Palo Alto Independent SB Aff Aff 2-1
Nano Nagle Classic Formerly Voices HS 2020-10-05 PF R6 Lynbrook BE Oakwood GS Neg
Nano Nagle Classic Formerly Voices HS 2020-10-05 PF R6 Torrey Pines KT BASIS Independent Silicon Valley AV Neg
Nano Nagle Classic Formerly Voices HS 2020-10-05 PF R5 Dougherty Valley RP Evergreen Independent KS Aff
Nano Nagle Classic Formerly Voices HS 2020-10-05 PF R5 Acton-Boxborough EF Mountain View DZ Aff
Nano Nagle Classic Formerly Voices HS 2020-10-05 PF R4 Lynbrook MA Dougherty Valley HS Neg
Nano Nagle Classic Formerly Voices HS 2020-10-05 PF R4 College Prep HO Carmel Valley Independent LM Neg
Yale University Invitational HS 2020-10-01 VPF R4 Plano West KC Milton Acad CC Pro
Stephen Stewart Middle and High School Invitational HS 2020-09-25 O PF Double Lynbrook EB Lambert MY Neg Neg 3-0
Stephen Stewart Middle and High School Invitational HS 2020-09-25 JV PF JV PF DouVal SJ QuaLan WS Neg Neg 3-0
Stephen Stewart Middle and High School Invitational HS 2020-09-25 O PF R5 Harker JC Cambrian II Neg
Stephen Stewart Middle and High School Invitational HS 2020-09-25 O PF R4 Dougherty Valley KP Cupertino KH Neg
Stephen Stewart Middle and High School Invitational HS 2020-09-25 JV PF R2 Americ NR ColPre DS Neg
Stephen Stewart Middle and High School Invitational HS 2020-09-25 O PF R1 Harker LP Seven Lakes LW Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O PF R6 Honor NT Cambridge KF Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O PF R6 Mission San Jose ZZ James Logan KS Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O PF R4 Union Catholic BK Quarry Lane JK Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O PF R4 Leland HX Harker RJ Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O PF R1 Miramonte Independent BM Cambridge YS Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament HS 2020-09-19 O PF R1 Archbishop Mitty CV Honor LS Neg
National Speech and Debate Season Opener Hosted by UK HS 2020-09-12 PF V Double Mission San Jose MC Delbarton LT Pro Pro 2-1
National Speech and Debate Season Opener Hosted by UK HS 2020-09-12 PF V Trips Bellaire LT Walt Whitman ML Con Con 2-1
National Speech and Debate Season Opener Hosted by UK HS 2020-09-12 PF V Quads Sidwell Independent PW Delbarton SM Pro Pro 3-0
National Speech and Debate Season Opener Hosted by UK HS 2020-09-12 PF V R5 Brentwood RH Del Norte Independent BP Con
National Speech and Debate Season Opener Hosted by UK HS 2020-09-12 PF V R5 North Broward Prep MS Ridgewood CH Con
National Speech and Debate Season Opener Hosted by UK HS 2020-09-12 PF V R4 Ridgewood LL Ravenwood BB Con
National Speech and Debate Season Opener Hosted by UK HS 2020-09-12 PF V R4 Hamilton High Independent CS Richard Montgomery HZ Con
TeleHealth Access for Seniors Charity Debate Classic HS 2020-09-05 VPF Quarte Lambert Independent YM University Independent TC Pro Pro 3-0
TeleHealth Access for Seniors Charity Debate Classic HS 2020-09-05 VPF Octos Hamilton High Independent SC Aschool MZ Pro Con 2-1
TeleHealth Access for Seniors Charity Debate Classic HS 2020-09-05 VPF R4 Independent PK Potomac UV Con
Beyond Resolved Institute Tournament 2020-07-30 Finals YooJoy LB ThoLam BT Neg Neg 3-0
Beyond Resolved Institute Tournament 2020-07-30 Semis YooJoy LB AppDri ZB Aff Aff 2-1
Beyond Resolved Institute Tournament 2020-07-30 Quarte Medica KS AppDri ZB Neg Neg 2-1
Beyond Resolved Institute Tournament 2020-07-30 R5 Sean PP Sean CA Aff
Beyond Resolved Institute Tournament 2020-07-30 R4 YooJoy LB YooJoy SS Aff
Beyond Resolved Institute Tournament 2020-07-30 R3 AppDri IM Medica HS Neg
Beyond Resolved Institute Tournament 2020-07-30 R2 ThoLam KB YooJoy DR Aff
Beyond Resolved Institute Tournament 2020-07-30 R1 YooJoy KC ThoLam HM Neg
Freshman Deathmatch Round Robin HS 2020-05-29 PF Runoff Rats EH Frogs JS Aff Neg 2-1