Andy Zhu Paradigm

Last changed 11/17 7:23A CDT

4 years of policy debate at MBA in Nashville, TN; Class of 2016

Current Junior at Vanderbilt University studying Political Science and Medicine, Health and Society

keeping old paradigm at the bottom b/c why not

add andrew.zhu@vanderbilt.edu please

Here's what's important:

I will communicate with you with head nods, eye contact, etc if I like what you're doing or not so pay attention during round

Evidence quality - especially for DAs and terrible counterplans

- I will assign 0 risk of a DA etc if evidence is bad, but team HAS TO SAY IT

- if you compare evidence I will like you

Debate is a speaking activity

- look me in the eye

- Speak clearly

- don't you dare double breathe

- have good posture, don't slouch

- be nice to teammate and opponent or else...

kritiks

- most of the time people have no idea what they're saying, if you do, you better explain it to me if you want to win

- focus on the links... please

- i'm not your judge for high theory because I hate it

k affs

- you probably can read a plan text and be topical....... do I need to say more? Topical version of aff is a winner for me if explained well

theory

- i'll absolutely vote on condo bad - I went for the argument a lot senior year, that being said I expect you to know what you're saying

- Impact work is extremely important

- you NEED a counterinterpretation for any good theory argument, if you use it and explain how your c/I takes care of their offense or at least mitigates it, you've gone a long way

immigration topic

- I know nothing about this topic so be clear with acronyms, stuff

- my parents are immigrants and I was born in the usa

- I dated internationally and know how hard it is to come here

/////////////////////////////////////////

old stuff

1. Is there prep for flashing?????!?!?!?

No, no there is not. I debated during paperless. And if there are problems, I understand. Please just don't abuse the time or take too long, because the tournament has to keep going.

2. Tagteam cross ex??

Of course.

3. Do you have any prefs!?!?!?!

Uhm.... yes...

If you read this philosophy, you will be rewarded in front of me. If you do things I do not like, then you will lose points in front of me.

Topic Disclaimer:

I have been out of debate for 2 years, and I do not know anything about the Education topic. Please, explain what your acronyms mean and help me out with complex education law. The more you help me out the more speaks you get.

Judging Profile:

I will start your speaks at an average of 29.0. This is higher than most judges? Why? Because I think people should be rewarded for what I consider to be good debate. This also means that I will take points away more liberally.

What I like:

Being nice!

  • Did you know that helping your partner when they need it, being nice and greeting people around you, giving paper to your opponents when they don't have any (YOU WOULDN'T BELIEVE HOW MANY KIDS DO THIS) is not only nice in terms of etiquette but also goes a long way to being a good human being? Be one.

Good posture and speaking clarity

  • Debate is supposed to be persuasive. I want people to set good examples of what debate can look like. If you read any comments section of a debate video on youtube, policy debate looks like a joke. Don't make debate a joke.
  • How?
    • Stand up straight.
    • Make eye contact.
    • Speak up.
    • Work on your voice tone (avoid too nasally, whiny, too much bass, graty, too loud etc.). You should ideally be a pleasure to listen to argumentatively and aesthetically. If you have a voice problem, let me know before the round.

Thus, things that will lose you points:

Essentially, the opposite of a lot of the things I mentioned.

  • DOUBLE BREATHING - this is a plague, and I would like it to stop. You can get the same amount of air required if you single breathe. Please look up breathing tutorials on youtube to fix this. If you usually double breathe, and you tell me before the round that you will try to work on it but are not perfect, then you get a pass. Triple breathing is insta 28 or less.
  • The debate "hunch over with timer or mouse held between my two hands as I move it vigorously back and forth as I gasp for air."
  • Being a jerk. There's a difference between being assertive and being mean. I know; there were people on my team that crossed the line. You'll probably get a 26, and you can say goodbye to speaker awards.
    • If you are racist or sexist in any intentional way, I will make sure your coach knows and you know.

Kritiks:

I have lots of experience with "normal" ks, capitalism, neolib, colonialism, etc.

When you get to high theory (Bathai, Deloser, etc.), the best way to win in front of me is to not read it! If you have to read it, then be self-aware enough that your stuff is bulls****. If you communicate this self-awareness to me then I will actually give you a shot.

I debated always a policy aff, but I definitely will vote on kritiks and critical arguments.

I really like alt explanation. What does the world of the alt look like? Do the aff's impacts get solved? Is it a movement or in round? Why does that matter? That's the most important part of the kritik for me.

This tells you how to beat the K too. Weigh your aff vs. the alt. Tell me what advantages you have that the alt can't possibly solve or solve fast enough for your timeframe. This is always the k's weakest part, but if it is strong it usually gives the neg a big advantage in my book.

The framework is important, and I have won my fair share of round on epistemology comes first or kappeler 95 meaning that alt doesn't even matter, but please please focus on the alt.

Also - more links! Specific links are ALWAYS good.

K affs:

Also, I like plans. Newsflash, no one outside of debate really cares about what goes on inside a debate. Realize that your "influence over the debate community" is a very small amount over an extremely small, insulated group of people. I am very persuaded by arguments saying that other forums are much more effective for spreading news about something. I've participated in a partial BLM march and the Womens' March. If you care, do something in real life. Debate is not real life. Debate can be your home, and that's great. But so can your local political party, if you want public speaking. So can your counselor's office, if you need someone to listen to. The only thing unique about debate is that you get to "win" something. Life isn't about winning; it's about doing good in the world. Do good the right way, and don't let anyone or yourself delude you into thinking that you couldn't do it better somewhere else.

- That said, if you are so woke and so persuasive that I cannot help but vote for you, then you probably get 30s and win.

- Otherwise, I WILL vote for K affs, I just want to let you know that smart framework debaters will probably win. If you can crush FW as the aff in front of me, then you deserve the win.

Theory:

#1, slow down on theory and you will win more rounds. Slowing it down shows the judge that you're not afraid of the other team hearing your arguments and believe it or not also lets me write them down.

As a senior, I went for Condo bad 25-50% of my aff rounds. This means I am more likely to vote for condo if you do it well, but if you do it badly then you don't stand a chance.

In general, if you provide solid counter interpretation debate on condo, that's where your starting point should be. If you read a 3 second "condo is bad strat skew time skew impact is education" blurb in the 2AC, you will lose speaker points because you are wasting my time. Neg, if you are in front of me ,and they do this, and you say "THEIR CONDO BAD ARG SUCKS," that's insta 29.5. But if they do it right and you mess up, don't blame me when your speaks drop.

If you want to go for other theory arguments, I will be much more likely persuaded if you give a counter interpretation. IE, if you say 50-state fiat bad, then your c/i could be Neg gets only federal ground with regards to government action. That's not a perfect c/i, but if you can stand your ground, defend it, and the opponent doesn't give one, your point of reference will be the only place to debate from and you're more likely to win in front of me.

General tech:

Don't give me the "they didn't touch this in the X speech give them 0 arguments ever and for ever against this!" I will allow "new" args as long as they are in the spirit of what has already been said. Obviously, there is a limit, and don't abuse this or I won't consider an arg at all.

Death good and extinction good are nonstarters. Don't go there. That includes racism good, genocide good....

Saying "you guys" is not a reason to vote down a team. If they apologize, leave it alone.

Evidence! Some judges almost don't care to read your evidence at all. If one of your opponent's cards doesn't say something, or is contradictory, FLAG IT! Say - LOOK AT BROWN 15, IT CONTRADICTS...... I will vote down entire disads purely based off of evidence.** I lost too many debates on stupid links that literally say nothing and are just tagged to say something. That said, you have to call it out. I will still read ev, but I won't weigh it as high as if the debater points out a flaw.

Full Judging Record

Tournament Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
WESTMINSTER 11/17/2018 OPEN Octafi Westminster RS Alpharetta HS BM Aff Aff on a 3-0
WESTMINSTER 11/17/2018 OPEN R5 Carrollton School of the Sacred Heart PA Westminster FI Aff
WESTMINSTER 11/17/2018 OPEN R4 Asian Debate League PT Westminster RS Neg
WESTMINSTER 11/17/2018 OPEN R3 Carrollton School of the Sacred Heart DP Westminster BK Neg
WESTMINSTER 11/17/2018 OPEN R2 Asian Debate League EC Alpharetta HS BM Neg
WESTMINSTER 11/17/2018 OPEN R1 Carrollton School of the Sacred Heart AD Asian Debate League KK Aff
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX BO-Q Dr. Bessie Rhodes School of Global Studies GT SA Bronx 2 OL Aff Aff on a 2-1
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R5 SA Harlem East MQ Lincoln WR Neg
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R3 Dr. Bessie Rhodes School of Global Studies BJ SA Bed-Stuy CP Aff
Middle School TOC hosted by UK 5/13/2018 CX R2 Asian Debate League HT SA Harlem North Central DD Aff
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 3/9/2018 NCX Fin Chattahoochee AJ Alpharetta HS JS Aff Aff on a 3-0
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 3/9/2018 NCX Sems Alpharetta HS JS USN CF Aff Aff on a 3-0
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 3/9/2018 NCX Quar USN CF Northview AC Aff Aff on a 3-0
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 3/9/2018 OCX R6 Chattahoochee MV Carrollton School of the Sacred Heart BD Aff
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 3/9/2018 NCX R5 Chattahoochee JB Alpharetta HS PC Neg
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 3/9/2018 OCX R4 Northview JR Alpharetta HS MB Neg
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 3/9/2018 NCX R3 Cambridge MR Alpharetta HS JS Neg
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 3/9/2018 NCX R2 Chattahoochee AJ USN BK Aff
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 3/9/2018 NCX R1 Northview AC Alpharetta HS CK Neg
Samford University Bishop Guild Debate Tournament 1/12/2018 NCX Finals Westminster KS Chattahoochee AJ Aff Aff on a 3-0
Samford University Bishop Guild Debate Tournament 1/12/2018 NCX Semifi Westminster KS Woodward GK Aff Aff on a 3-0
Samford University Bishop Guild Debate Tournament 1/12/2018 NCX Quarte Chattahoochee AJ Carrollton School of the Sacred Heart GD Aff Aff on a 3-0
Samford University Bishop Guild Debate Tournament 1/12/2018 VCX R5 Mountain Brook AL Riverwood JP Aff
Samford University Bishop Guild Debate Tournament 1/12/2018 VCX R4 Westminster AB Carrollton School of the Sacred Heart CG Aff
Samford University Bishop Guild Debate Tournament 1/12/2018 VCX R3 Chattahoochee MV Carrollton School of the Sacred Heart AP Aff
Samford University Bishop Guild Debate Tournament 1/12/2018 NCX R2 Alpharetta HS KJ Arabia Mountain Rams JR Aff
Samford University Bishop Guild Debate Tournament 1/12/2018 VCX R1 Westminster IY Chattahoochee DX Neg
National Speech and Debate Season Opener hosted by UK 9/8/2017 NPD Quarte Calhou DG Westmi KD Neg Neg on a 3-0
National Speech and Debate Season Opener hosted by UK 9/8/2017 VPD R6 Westminster DN Chattahoochee HZ Neg
National Speech and Debate Season Opener hosted by UK 9/8/2017 VPD R5 Thomas Jefferson HSST TD Westminster MP Neg
National Speech and Debate Season Opener hosted by UK 9/8/2017 VPD R3 Phoenix Military TC Northview PY Aff
National Speech and Debate Season Opener hosted by UK 9/8/2017 VPD R2 Cathedral Prep BC USN MM Neg
National Speech and Debate Season Opener hosted by UK 9/8/2017 VPD R1 Wylie E. Groves BM Westminster MK Aff
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 1/15/2016 NCX Sem USN FL Pace HN Neg Neg on a 2-1
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 1/15/2016 NCX Quar USN FL Johns Creek DK Aff Aff on a 3-0
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 1/15/2016 NCX Oct Westminster Schools FR Northview TS Aff Neg on a 2-1
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 1/15/2016 NCX Round Calhoun FP Carrollton School of the Sacred Heart RA Aff
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 1/15/2016 NCX Round Johns Creek DK Woodward MK Neg
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 1/15/2016 NCX Round Pace HN Pine Crest Preparatory BS Aff
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 1/15/2016 NCX Round Hume-Fogg Academic Magnet AS Alpharetta GD Neg
University of Georgia HS Bulldog Debates 1/15/2016 NCX Round USN RD Alpharetta DU Aff