Madi Gackenbach
Paradigm Statement
Last changed 7 January 2022 6:33 AM CDTHead coach at Plano East Senior High.
In LD, I’ve gotten much more progressive, but I tend to still favor traditional.
-I do not like Kritiks; they are generic and lazy debating - I will not vote for them.
-On case attacks are important!
-Theory, CPs, PICs, RoB, DAs, are all good.
-Do not read at me while giving voters.
-2AR does not necessarily have to be line-by-line.
-I understand spreading, but if you become unclear I will say "clear" once, and after that, if you do not clear your speaking, I will stop flowing, more than likely hurting your chances. 7/10 speed please. Slow down on tags please.
In PF, I’m traditional. I don’t like spreading in PF and there should definitely not be CPs, Theory, Kritiks, or anything like that.
In Policy, pretty much the same as LD above. I have a lot less experience in Policy than the other debate events, but I have some competitive CX history and can cross apply progressive LD knowledge.
In all debates: I do not tolerate rudeness - especially in cx/crossfire. I love seeing passion in rounds, but being passionate about your topic does not mean you get to be rude. Excessive rudeness/terrible attitude results in 25 speaks.
Include me in on email chains: madison.gackenbach@pisd.edu
I look forward to hearing you speak!
Full Judging Record
Judge Certifications

Judge attests they have taken the NFHS Cultural Competency Judge Training course. Required of all judges at NSDA tournaments.
nsda-demographics
NSDA Nationals Demographics Questionnaire. Optional form requested of all judges.
nsda-ld-paradigm
Questionnaire required of all LD judges at the NSDA National Tournament, even if they have a written Tabroom paradigm.