Denise Carmona ParadigmLast changed 12/25 11:26A CDT
Email chain- email@example.com
tech > truth
I'm alright with voting for anything as long as there's a detailed/fleshed out explanation of it than just shadow extending it and expecting me to vote for it just because it was conceded/dropped. Tell me why certain arguments have value. I won't do the work for you. Also, just frame the debate clearly and I'll probably vote for you.
I'm a flex debater so i'm comfortable with voting on Ks, CPs (unless abusive if called out by the other team and will usually believe them if enough explanation is given against it), ptx DAs, no plan-text affirmatives, etc.
Full Judging Record
|Debating the Discord Part 1||1546009200 12/28/2018||CX||4 R4||4/3 GBX & Sparky||Daveed||Neg|
|Debating the Discord Part 1||1546009200 12/28/2018||CX||3 R3||Epic Gamers DP||Big Brains BG||Neg|
|Debating the Discord Part 1||1546009200 12/28/2018||CX||2 R2||Daveed||Obtaining Grain CG||Aff|
|Debating the Discord Part 1||1546009200 12/28/2018||CX||1 R1||Epic Gamers DP||Aff|