Bennett Eckert Paradigm

Last changed 10/11 7:24A UTC

Updated for St. Mark's 2019.

Greenhill 2016
Northwestern 2020
I coach Greenhill, and I'm conflicted from Harrison.

Email: greenhilldocs.ld@gmail.com

Topic-Specific Things

[1] I think that the most recent "Nebel T" article is really good. I'll judge debates about this argument like any other debate, but it seems like a lot of people have come to think that "Nebel T" is preposterous or can easily be brushed off in the 1AR, and I do not think that either of those things are true.

[2] I am not doing a lot of topic research for SepOct 2019, so you should not expect me to know acronyms/history of the topic/things like that. Err on the side of over-explaining arguments that are deep in the topic literature.

Things to know

[1] I saw a lot of miscut evidence last year. I think that evidence ethics matters regardless of whether an argument/ethics challenge is raised in the debate. This year, if I notice that a piece of evidence is miscut, I will vote against the debater who reads the miscut evidence.

I think that a piece of evidence is miscut if:

  • it starts and/or ends in the middle of a sentence or paragraph.

  • text is missing from the middle of the card (replacing that text with an ellipsis does not make it okay),

  • the next paragraph or another part of the article explicitly contradicts the argument/claim made in the card,

  • the card is highlighted in a way that modifies or does not accurately represent the author’s claim [Be careful with brackets - I don’t think they always mean a card is miscut, but I’ve seen that they very often do. I think that brackets, more often than not, are bad - if a bracket changes the strength of a claim made by the author, or in some other way changes the *meaning* of the evidence, it is miscut] [also, I think that highlighting only part of a word is the same as bracketing - if you highlight only part of a word, then the word you read is not what the author wrote],

  • the cite lists the wrong author or article title (I hope to decide 0 debates this year on citations - I’ll only decide debates on them without challenges in the most egregious cases).

If I decide a debate on evidence ethics, I will let the debate finish as normal. If the debate is a prelim, I will decide speaks based on the content of the debate and subtract two speaker points from the debater that I vote against. If the debate is an elim, I will submit my ballot and won’t say anything about my decision until the debate is announced.

If both sides read miscut evidence, I will vote against the debater who read miscut evidence first. (I really don’t love this as a way to evaluate these debates, but the only comparable scenario that I can think of is clipping, and that’s how I would resolve those debates.)

If I decide a debate on evidence ethics, I will make an effort to contact your coach/the adult with you at the tournament and let them know before I announce the decision.

I do not plan to go out of my way looking for miscut evidence or checking to see whether every card is cut correctly. If I do notice that something is miscut, I will vote against the debater who reads it regardless of whether a challenge is made.

Please do not hesitate to ask questions about this before the debate.

[2] If a debater says that a piece of evidence is miscut in round and their opponent clarifies that they are making an "evidence ethics challenge" (and the former person confirms that they want to make a challenge), the debate ends. I will read all of the relevant stuff and then make a decision. Whoever is correct on the evidence ethics challenge wins the debate. The loser will get the lowest speaks I can give.

In lieu of an evidence ethics challenge, I am also ok with asking your opponent to just strike the cards from the doc/cross them off the flow in cx and have the rest of the debate but calling a challenge if they refuse to do so (this is noble but not required). You could also make arguments about why misquoting is bad, but I'm compelled by a response that basically says "call an ethics challenge or don't make the argument; we'll stake the debate on it." Indeed, I think that if you make an evidence ethics argument, you should be willing to stake the debate on it. If you don't stake the round on it, you'll still win (if they committed the evidence ethics violation), but your speaks will be worse than they otherwise would have been.

[3] I do not flow author names.

[4] I have no interest in judging debates about bad theory arguments. They are bad, boring, and pointless. If you make an exceptionally terrible theory argument, I just won't vote on it. This doesn't apply to many arguments. For example, arguments that are fair game are CP theory, plans good/bad, some spec args, AFC good/bad, etc. This is only meant to exclude really awful arguments like "neg may only make 2 arguments," "must spec CP status in speech," "must read an explicit standard text," "must contest the aff framework," and "must spec what you meant when you said 'competing interps.'" Good theory debates are awesome and fun to judge and strategic theory is fine, but theory debates about arguments this bad are honestly just not worth my time.

[5] I value explanation a lot. I've found that I vote aff in a lot of debates in which the neg goes for a ton of arguments, each of which could be a winning 2NR but end up getting very under-explained. I have also voted for a lot of debaters whose evidence is not amazing but who give very good explanations/spin for that evidence. The best debaters I've seen collapse in rebuttals, give overviews, and weigh.

[6] I am unlikely to be convinced that something categorically outweighs something else (e.g. .01% risk of extinction outweighs, fairness outweighs everything no matter what, etc.). Your weighing arguments should be contextual/comparative.

[7] I have difficulty piecing together debates in which the 2NR reads a very long overview but doesn’t mention how arguments in the overview interact with 1AR arguments. To avoid me having difficulty, you should either do most of your work on the line-by-line or flag which parts of the overview answer which aff arguments.

[8] I often read a lot of cards after debates. When I look at cards after the debate, I am generally looking for a few things. [a] Does the card say what the tag says? How explicitly does it do so? Is the card specific to the claim being made in the tag? [b] Does the argument in the card match the explanation/extension of the card? [c] Is the argument in the card good?

[9] I really enjoy good T, policy-style, theory, and K v. policy aff debates. I’ve found that I normally do not like “philosophy”/ framework debates because they tend to involve bad mis-explanations of moral theories, cards cut out of context, and general trickery/tomfoolery. Paraphrasing Travis Fife: If you actually read moral/political philosophy and apply it to debate in a way that’s true to the literature, I might be a great judge for you. If you use moral theory as an excuse for engaging in trickery/obfuscation and making implausible normative claims, I am a very bad judge for you (and you should stop doing that).

[10] I have voted for T/framework against K affs more often than I have voted against it. When I vote neg in T/FW debates, I normally vote on skills-type impacts and topic education impacts, and I almost never vote on "fairness is an intrinsic good." When I vote aff in these debates, I normally think that the aff has done something to mitigate the neg's impact (e.g. a counter-interpretation that solves, link/impact defense) and won a good-size piece of offense for their counter-interpretation. I think the aff in these debates needs to have a counter-interpretation and should prove that that counter-interpretation is better than the neg interpretation.

[11] I have a poor understanding of high theory. I will of course vote on it, but I won't vote on something that I cannot coherently explain, so the bar for explanation is pretty high. In general, you should not assume I am well-read on the literature you’re reading unless it’s contemporary analytic ethics. I have found that slowing down, collapsing, and giving examples all enhance my understanding of arguments made in rounds.

[12] I am very unlikely to vote on a "risk of offense" argument on theory. I'm inclined to think that the debater initiating theory has to generate a real/substantial advantage to their interpretation that I could describe without using the term "risk of offense".

[13] “Reasonability” means to me that the person answering theory need only meet a “reasonable” interpretation, rather than the optimal interpretation. “Reasonability” does not mean to me: “evaluate just whether our particular aff should be allowed,” “only demonstrated/in-round/whatever-you-call-it abuse matters,” or “we may ‘reasonably meet their interpretation.’”

I think that reasonability is most persuasive against theory arguments with a very small impact. The best arguments for reasonability argue that requiring debaters’ practices to meet a certain (reasonable) standard, rather than requiring them to meet the optimal standard, produces the best debates. Generic “competing interps is bad” arguments are not great args for reasonability.

[14] Please slow down on theory arguments, especially if you don't put them on their own pages. If you read theory args at the same speed that you read cards, I almost certainly won't get down everything that you want me to.

[15] I'm not interested in listening to call-outs of or jabs at other schools, debaters, coaches, etc. E.g. I don't want to hear "[School X] always does this!" or "Of course [Debater Y] is going for [argument]!" Lines like these do not help illustrate your argument at all, make the debate uncomfortable to judge, and are often just mean/uncalled for.

Things I Won't Vote On

A prioris

Oppression good (if you concede that your position entails that oppression is good, then your position is that oppression is good)

Moral skepticism

Trivialism

Awful theory args

Speaks

I will give speaks based on how well I think you should do at the tournament. I also give higher speaks to reward strategies and arguments that I think are good/enjoyable to listen to/generally fun.
Here's a rough scale of how I'll give speaks:

30 = you should win everything. I've given one 30 and one 29.9. I would have given a 30 to the person to whom I gave a 29.9 if they had put topicality in the 1NC.

29.5-29.9 = you should be in late elims

29-29.5 = you should clear

28.5-29 = you should be on the bubble

27.5-28.5 = average

26.5-27.5 = you made some important strategic errors/lacked a clear strategy

<26.5 = I found something about this debate very annoying

Disclosure

Just disclose, ok? If you don't meet some minimum threshold for disclosure (the Greenhill tournament disclosure policy requires what I consider the minimum acceptable disclosure) and your opponent reads disclosure theory, then you're going to lose.

The aff must tell the neg what aff they're going to read unless it's a new aff.

At the Greenhill RR/tournament I am going to adjudicate disputes about the disclosure policy exclusively on the basis of who I think is correct. Both debaters can say their piece/explain the situation but I will not decide these disputes "on the flow." To be clear, I'll still evaluate arguments like "must disclose full text/open source/etc." like other normal theory arguments. But I will decide disputes about the disclosure policy such as those about: lying about what the aff said, whether someone didn't disclose tags/cites/whatever, whether someone waited too long to disclose, etc. based on what I think about the disclosure policy. I will not listen to debates about whether the disclosure policy matters/how it's worded/whether your school doesn't have a wiki (you should have foreseen this problem)/how bad the wifi is/etc. If you have questions about how I interpret the disclosure policy, feel free to ask me whenever.

The wiki goes down during the Greenhill tournament. When it does, both debaters should make an effort to contact each other to disclose.

People that have influenced my views on debate

Eli Smith

Rodrigo Paramo

Aaron Timmons

Marshall Thompson

Chris Theis

Jake Nebel

Danny DeBois

Full Judging Record

Tournament Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
Heart of Texas 2 10/18/2019 LD R5 Northland Christian AB Anderson BC Neg
Heart of Texas 2 10/18/2019 LD R5 Harvard-Westlake AG Westwood AZ Aff
Heart of Texas 2 10/18/2019 LD R4 Harvard-Westlake JC McNeil AR Neg
Heart of Texas 2 10/18/2019 LD R4 Westwood AL George Ranch NS Neg
Heart of Texas 2 10/18/2019 LD R3 Harvard-Westlake SK Loyola JC Aff
Heart of Texas 2 10/18/2019 LD R2 Southlake Carroll PK Harvard-Westlake AM Neg
Heart of Texas 2 10/18/2019 LD R1 Fusion KS Northland Christian JQ Neg
Heart of Texas 2 10/18/2019 LD R1 Garland LY Harvard-Westlake SM Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD Semifi Harvard-Westlake SM Santa Monica RE Aff Aff on a 2-1
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD Quarte Harvard-Westlake SM Edgemont RG Aff Aff on a 2-1
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD Octafi Newsome DB Dougherty Valley KK Neg Aff on a 2-1
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD Double Harvard-Westlake SM Loyola JC Aff Aff on a 3-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD Double Northland Christian JQ Edgemont RG Neg Neg on a 3-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R6 Dougherty Valley KD Cypress Woods AZ Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD RR R6 Strake Jesuit BE Harvard-Westlake SM Neg Neg on a 2-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R6 Northland Christian ABr Katy Taylor AP Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD RR R5 Northland Christian JQ Strake Jesuit BE Neg Neg on a 2-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R5 Harvard-Westlake MP Trinity Valley KK Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD RR R4 Harvard-Westlake AM Oak Hall KZ Neg Neg on a 2-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R4 Harvard-Westlake SM Immaculate Heart BC Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R4 Houston Memorial AQ Edgemont RG Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R3 Northland Christian LB Loyola JC Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R3 Westwood SM Plano East WZ Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R2 Harker AV Lovejoy KC Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD RR R2 Harvard-Westlake SM Plano East NG Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R2 Northland Christian AB Harvard-Westlake GZ Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R1 Loyola CL Harker AR Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD R1 Harvard-Westlake AM Irma Rangel YWLS VG Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/12/2019 LD RR R1 Northland Christian AuB Edgemont RG Neg Neg on a 2-0
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD Semis Harker AM Harvard-Westlake VC Neg Neg on a 3-0
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD Quarte Appleton East MM Harvard-Westlake VC Neg Neg on a 3-0
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD Octo Harvard-Westlake VC Harker SS Aff Aff on a 3-0
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD R6 Harvard-Westlake BW Mission San Jose MS Aff
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD R5 Harvard-Westlake MP Newark Science SB Aff
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD R4 Harvard-Westlake NR Harker KM Aff
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD R4 Harvard-Westlake WB Harker DS Aff
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD R3 Pace AN Harvard-Westlake VC Neg
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD R3 Marlborough ST Harvard-Westlake AG Neg
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD R2 Meadows KS New Trier PT Aff
NDCA 4/13/2019 LD R1 Harvard-Westlake SM Harker RT Aff
King Round Robin 3/29/2019 LDRR Semi Independent NG Anderson SJ Neg Neg on a 3-0
King Round Robin 3/29/2019 LDRR Quarte Independent NG James Bowie TW Aff Aff on a 2-1
King Round Robin 3/29/2019 LDRR R5 Quarry Lane SK Newark Science SB Aff Aff on a 2-0
King Round Robin 3/29/2019 LDRR R4 James Bowie TW Northland Christian JQ Aff Aff on a 2-0
King Round Robin 3/29/2019 LDRR R2 Newark Science SB Anderson SJ Neg Neg on a 2-0
King Round Robin 3/29/2019 LDRR R1 Northland Christian JQ Strake Jesuit BE Neg Neg on a 2-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD Quarte Harvard-Westlake VC Santa Monica RE Aff Aff on a 2-1
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD Octafi Strake Jesuit College Prep JH Harvard-Westlake JN Aff Aff on a 3-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD Double Montgomery GC Harvard-Westlake JG Neg Neg on a 3-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R6 Harvard-Westlake SM Strake Jesuit College Prep JH Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R6 Strake Jesuit College Prep VL New Trier PT Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R5 Holy Cross BZ Immaculate Heart LM Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R4 Harvard-Westlake SP Round Rock SG Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R4 Immaculate Heart MC William G. Enloe TG Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R3 Lovejoy CM Harvard-Westlake AD Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R3 Westwood DL Meadows KS Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R2 Alief Taylor DM Harvard-Westlake MG Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R2 Westwood TL Harvard-Westlake VC Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R1 Brentwood DW Edgemont RG Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/13/2018 LD R1 New Trier WT Westwood AZ Neg
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD Semis University RH Santa Monica RE Neg Neg on a 2-1
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD Qrtrs Brentwood WJ St. Andrew's Episcopal IB Neg Aff on a 2-1
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD Octos Santa Monica RE San Marino ED Aff Aff on a 3-0
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD Octos Brentwood WJ Harvard-Westlake IP Aff Aff on a 2-1
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD Dbls Walt Whitman DH Immaculate Heart DD Neg Neg on a 3-0
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD Dbls Harvard-Westlake SP Brentwood WJ Neg Neg on a 3-0
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD R5 Immaculate Heart DD Walt Whitman DH Aff
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD R4 Harvard-Westlake AM Westview RS Aff
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD R4 Phillips Academy Andover TC Strake Jesuit College Prep MC Aff
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD R3 Lake Highland Prep AA Torrey Pines FK Aff
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD R2 Immaculate Heart LM Harvard-Westlake LM Neg
Tournament of Champions 4/28/2018 LD R1 Brentwood RY Byram Hills LP Aff
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/26/2018 LD PB Winston Churchill WC Newark Science BA Neg Neg on a 3-0
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/26/2018 LD RKR Newark Science BA American Heritage Plantation RG Aff Aff on a 3-0
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/26/2018 LD WAU Cambridge Rindge and Latin MB St. Andrew's Episcopal IB Neg Neg on a 3-0
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/26/2018 LD R5 Cambridge Rindge and Latin AG Strake Jesuit College Prep VL Aff
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/26/2018 LD R5 Strake Jesuit College Prep DT Westwood RM Neg
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/26/2018 LD R4 Evanston Twp ES Cypress Bay NB Neg
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/26/2018 LD R4 Edgemont ML New Trier PT Aff
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD 1/16 Immaculate Heart DD San Marino ED Neg Neg on a 2-1
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD 1/16 Chaminade CP RA Santa Monica RE Aff Aff on a 3-0
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD 1/32 Brentwood HG Westwood RM Neg Neg on a 2-1
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD 1/32 Torrey Pines FK Westwood RS Aff Aff on a 2-1
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD 1/64 Mountain View MS Dougherty Valley AB Neg Aff on a 2-1
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD R6 San Marino VL Harker SS Neg
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 RR R6 San Marino ED Harvard-Westlake JD Neg
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD R6 Immaculate Heart LM William G. Enloe TG Aff
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 RR R5 Harvard-Westlake SP Harker SL Aff
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD R5 Immaculate Heart MC Troy LG Aff
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD R5 Santa Monica RE Brentwood HG Aff
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD R4 Brentwood WJ Chaminade CP RA Aff
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD R4 Loyola AO Torrey Pines FK Neg
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD R1 North Hollywood JS Meadows KS Aff
The Harvard Westlake Debates 1/11/2018 VLD R1 Dougherty Valley AR San Marino ED Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VLD Octos Collegiate KY West Des Moines Valley CT Neg Neg on a 3-0
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VLD Sextos Harvard-Westlake AM Santa Monica RE Aff Neg on a 2-1
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VLD R6 Evanston Twp ES Strake Jesuit College Prep JH Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VLD R6 Edina SC Cape Fear MA Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VLD R5 Northwood KK Lake Travis EM Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VLD R5 Harker AR Houston Memorial PM Aff
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VLD R4 Strake Jesuit College Prep MC Collegiate KY Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VLD R4 Houston Memorial AO West Des Moines Valley KK Neg
Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/18/2017 VLD R2 University RH Harvard-Westlake JN Neg
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD Semis Newark Science BA Lake Highland Prep AA Aff Aff on a 2-1
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD Quarte Newark Science BA Cambridge Rindge and Latin AG Aff Aff on a 3-0
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD Octos Strake Jesuit College Prep MC West Des Moines Valley KK Aff Aff on a 3-0
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD Double Strake Jesuit College Prep JH Dougherty Valley KK Neg Neg on a 2-1
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD Triple Harvard-Westlake IP William G. Enloe TG Aff Aff on a 3-0
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD R6 Harvard-Westlake MG Scarsdale SH Aff
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD R5 Lexington EL Cape Fear MA Aff
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD R4 Strake Jesuit College Prep NT Harvard-Westlake SP Neg
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD R3 Strake Jesuit College Prep MC Edina AM Aff
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD R2 Loyola AB Brentwood EL Neg
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2017 VLD R1 Loyola ST Harvard-Westlake IP Neg
Heart of Texas Invitational 10/13/2017 LD Octas Immaculate Heart DD Harvard-Westlake SP Aff Aff on a 2-1
Heart of Texas Invitational 10/13/2017 LD Double Montgomery AW Strake Jesuit College Prep CL Aff Aff on a 3-0
Heart of Texas Invitational 10/13/2017 LD Double Harvard-Westlake SP Apple Valley KA Aff Aff on a 3-0
Heart of Texas Invitational 10/13/2017 LD R5 Strake Jesuit College Prep AN Harvard-Westlake MG Neg
Heart of Texas Invitational 10/13/2017 LD R5 Harker AL Strake Jesuit College Prep JH Neg
Heart of Texas Invitational 10/13/2017 LD R3 Lake Travis EY Winston Churchill BR Neg
Heart of Texas Invitational 10/13/2017 LD R3 Lake Travis EM Cypress Woods YW Neg
Heart of Texas Invitational 10/13/2017 LD R2 Kinkaid SM Loyola AO Neg
Heart of Texas Invitational 10/13/2017 LD R1 Loyola JC Harvard-Westlake SP Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD Final Harvard-Westlake IP Immaculate Heart DD Neg Neg on a 2-1
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD Semifi Immaculate Heart DD Klein Oak AG Aff Aff on a 2-1
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD Quarte Success Academy Manhattan SC Harvard-Westlake IP Neg Neg on a 3-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD Octafi Brentwood RY Harvard-Westlake IP Neg Neg on a 3-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD Double Immaculate Heart LM St. Andrew's Episcopal IB Neg Neg on a 3-0
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD R6 Immaculate Heart LM Brentwood WJ Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD R6 Westwood AG Strake Jesuit College Prep JH Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD R5 Success Academy Manhattan SC Harvard-Westlake JN Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD R4 Montgomery GC Winston Churchill WC Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD R3 University RH Loyola HF Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD R3 Kinkaid JS San Marino ED Neg
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD R2 Christopher Columbus AT Presentation NV Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD R2 Carroll HS - Southlake SM Lovejoy CM Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD R1 Marlborough MC Loyola ST Aff
Greenhill Fall Classic 9/16/2017 LD R1 Westwood RM Texas MX Aff
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD Quarte Winston Churchill WC Cypress Woods CJ Neg Neg on a 3-0
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD Octafi Winston Churchill WC Kempner JS Aff Aff on a 2-1
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD Double Cypress Woods CJ Montgomery GC Neg Aff on a 2-1
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD Double Montgomery MW Texas Academy of Math & Science MX Neg Neg on a 2-1
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD R5 Lovejoy CM Colleyville Heritage AL Aff
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD R5 Lake Travis BO Carroll Senior TP Aff
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD R4 Edina PS Harker KS Neg
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD R4 Reagan MC LC Anderson AA Aff
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD R3 Kinkaid SM Montgomery GC Neg
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD R3 Lake Travis EM Colleyville Heritage SM Aff
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD R2 Burleson Centennial HM Winston Churchill BR Neg
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD R2 Isidore Newman SG Hockaday AS Neg
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD R1 LC Anderson DG Trinity WT Aff
Grapevine Classic 9/8/2017 LD R1 Reagan DM Prosper JR Neg
43rd Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament 2/18/2017 VLD Double Hunter College NP Law Magnet MG Aff Aff on a 3-0
43rd Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament 2/18/2017 VLD R6 Aviation JS Bronx HS of Science SR Aff
43rd Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament 2/18/2017 VLD R6 Lexington VR North Crowley (Independent) LR Neg
43rd Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament 2/18/2017 VLD R5 Walt Whitman JL William G. Enloe TG Neg
43rd Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament 2/18/2017 VLD R5 Lexington LE Evanston LT Aff
43rd Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament 2/18/2017 VLD R4 Ridge VT Oakwood JW Neg
43rd Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament 2/18/2017 VLD R4 Southlake Carroll AP Hunter College NP Neg
43rd Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament 2/18/2017 VLD R3 McDowell SK Scarsdale LS Neg
43rd Annual Harvard National Forensics Tournament 2/18/2017 JVLD R2 Needham JL Durant HH Aff
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/27/2017 LD PB Harvard-Westlake IP Success Academy SC Neg Aff on a 2-1
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/27/2017 LD RKR Byram Hills JB Harvard-Westlake EE Neg Neg on a 3-0
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/27/2017 LD RKR Lake Highland Prep AA Harvard-Westlake IP Neg Neg on a 2-1
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/27/2017 LD WAU Millburn CS La Canada AZ Neg Neg on a 3-0
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/27/2017 LD R5 Pembroke Pines Charter SS Newark Science BA Neg
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/27/2017 LD R4 Henry W. Grady MW Lassiter AO Aff
Barkley Forum for High Schools 1/27/2017 LD R3 Apple Valley JB Houston County AE Aff
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD Octos Strake Jesuit MC La Canada AZ Aff Neg on a 2-1
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD Dubs Harker SPy Chaminade JT Aff Aff on a 3-0
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD Dubs Brentwood RY Dougherty Valley CS Aff Aff on a 3-0
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD Trips Brentwood JD Chaminade RA Neg Aff on a 2-1
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R6 Harker NT Marlborough SD Neg
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R6 Strake Jesuit JH Harker SPy Neg
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R5 Arcadia JC Lynbrook VV Neg
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R5 La Canada AZ Lynbrook HW Aff
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R4 Harker LF San Marino KW Aff
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R4 Immaculate Heart LM Oakwood Secondary School - North Hollywood LB Neg
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R3 San Marino VL Harker KS Aff
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R3 Harker QC Dougherty Valley PT Neg
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R2 Palo Alto (Independent) CF Harker ACh Aff
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R2 Lynbrook NA TP Falcons JC Neg
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R1 Lynbrook NS Brentwood KM Aff
Harvard Westlake Debates 1/12/2017 VLD R1 Harker AT Dougherty Valley PC Aff
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD Semis Stuyvesant KF Harvard-Westlake EE Neg Neg on a 2-1
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD Qtrs Harvard-Westlake EE Dougherty Valley CS Aff Aff on a 2-1
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD Octos Oakwood School - North Hollywood JW Cypress Woods LC Neg Neg on a 2-1
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD Octos Harvard-Westlake CE Strake Jesuit JH Aff Aff on a 3-0
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD Sextos Success Academy SC Millburn CS Neg Aff on a 2-1
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD R6 Harvard-Westlake CE Millburn CS Neg
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD R5 Harker SL Katy Taylor CR Aff
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD R5 Winston Churchill BW Isidore Newman MK Aff
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD R4 Dougherty Valley KK Bellarmine PB Aff
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD R3 Harker SP Lexington KB Aff
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD R2 Peninsula JL Millburn AJ Aff
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD R2 Apple Valley CR West Ranch JH Neg
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD R1 Harker NT Bronx HS Of Science GM Neg
2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament 11/19/2016 VLD R1 Anderson IS Apple Valley KA Neg
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2016 VLD Dbls Lake Highland Prep MC Syosset AM Neg Neg on a 3-0
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2016 VLD Trips Walt Whitman DH Oakwood School AW Aff Neg on a 2-1
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2016 VLD R5 Walt Whitman DH Quarry Lane SK Aff
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2016 VLD R4 Lake Highland Prep SS West Des Moines Valley MS Neg
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2016 VLD R3 New Trier CM Strake Jesuit CP RC Neg
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2016 VLD R2 Collegiate KY New Trier AP Aff
Apple Valley MinneApple Debate 11/3/2016 VLD R1 Strake Jesuit CP MC Lexington KL Aff
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD Quarte Scarsdale ZE Oakwood JW Neg Neg on a 3-0
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD Octos Bronx Science ZP Harker SP Neg Neg on a 2-1
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD Octos Scarsdale LS Hunter College NP Neg Neg on a 3-0
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD Double St. Andrew's Episcopal IB Harker EM Neg Neg on a 3-0
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD Double Apple Valley JB Scarsdale GZ Neg Neg on a 2-1
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R6 St. Louis Park DA Hunter College NP Neg
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R6 Lake Highland Prep SG Mountain View DZ Neg
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R5 Palo Alto(Independent) FZ Scarsdale GZ Neg
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R5 Harker EM Apple Valley CR Aff
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R4 St Thomas LW Barrington TC Neg
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R4 Lake Highland Prep RS Loyola DW Aff
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R3 Oakwood AW Lake Highland Prep MK Neg
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R3 Walt Whitman IX Evanston GH Neg
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R2 Oxbridge Academy of the Palm Beaches AW Strake Jesuit CP JH Neg
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R2 Loyola ES Strake Jesuit CP CL Neg
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R1 Strake Jesuit CP JM Walt Whitman XR Neg
Mid America Cup West Des Moines Valley 9/24/2016 VLD R1 Loyola GC Harker SP Neg
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/18/2016 LD1 Semifi Harvard-Westlake Jaya Nayar Marlborough Sophia Danielpour Aff Aff on a 3-0
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/18/2016 LD1 Quarte Marquette University William Deverey Harvard-Westlake Jaya Nayar Neg Neg on a 3-0
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/18/2016 LD1 Octafi Lake Highland Prep Abby Morris Marquette University William Deverey Neg Neg on a 3-0
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/18/2016 LD1 Round Harvard-Westlake Anusha Mathur Northland Christian Brady Trieu Neg
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/18/2016 LD1 Round Harvard-Westlake Alexandra Mork Lake Highland Prep Abby Bouzianis Aff
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/18/2016 LD2 Round Northland Christian Macie Baker Northview Vineet Reddy Aff
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/18/2016 LD1 Round Marlborough Sophia Danielpour Harvard-Westlake Jaya Nayar Neg
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational 2/5/2016 NLD R3 williams GJ San Marcos DO Neg
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational 2/5/2016 NLD R3 Grapevine RS Southlake Carroll GI Aff
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational 2/5/2016 NLD R2 Marcus KL Carroll Middle Schools DV Aff
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational 2/5/2016 NLD R2 williams UM Carroll Middle Schools RM Neg
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational 2/5/2016 NLD R1 Marcus DK Grapevine DS Neg
Colleyville Heritage Winter Invitational 2/5/2016 NLD R1 Southlake Carroll HX williams SC Aff
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/20/2015 LD1 Quarte Lake Highland Prep Rithvik Seela Harvard-Westlake Vishan Chaudhary Neg Neg on a 3-0
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/20/2015 LD1 Octafi Marist Niko Battle Harvard-Westlake Nick Platt Neg Neg on a 3-0
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/20/2015 LD1 Round Harvard-Westlake Emmanuel Zilber Lambert Naren Reddy Aff
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/20/2015 LD1 Round Marlborough Mia Coates Harvard-Westlake Evan Engel Neg
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/20/2015 LD1 Round Lake Highland Prep Steven Goldware Harvard-Westlake Lauren Morganbesser Aff
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/20/2015 LD1 Round Harvard-Westlake Indu Pandey Lake Highland Prep Rithvik Seela Neg
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/20/2015 LD1 Round Harvard-Westlake Jake Davidson Medina Ngozi Williams Aff
1st and 2nd Year National Championships at Woodward Academy 3/20/2015 LD1 Round Northview Sanjana Rao Harvard-Westlake Matthew Gross Neg