Eric Johnston Paradigm

Last changed 9/21 12:51A PDT

Quick: explain everything including why you've won; don't assume knowledge; run whatever is productive for you, but also know that my technical acumen isn't likely to exceed that of your opponents', who also stopped flowing at the thirty-second mark of your meticulously timed 2:45m overview on T, or even if it's 15s tbh

Update for 2019-20

Full disclosure/honesty: I am probably not the ideal judge for you, if your style of debating is extremely fast and technical, though I will certainly put in the effort to try. It is your debate

It's been a while since I've done much debate-related things - my hands have become slow slow and my ears are even slower. Debate is for the debaters, so you can postround me if you'd like. That can be valuable, even if it's just cathartic, which is also valuable in itself. Your own decision is just as valid as mine, but that also means that mine is just as valid as yours, even if I missed that really obvious round-deciding arg that's been there since the 2ac. I'm mainly putting this out there so you have some sense of my limits as a judge, but I'm also trying to make it known that limits aren't necessarily aren't the end of what makes one decision more or less "correct," although inevitably my decision will have more weight than yours - sorry! just hf:)

2017

DEBATE EXPERIENCE
High School--Bravo Medical Magnet HS (2013-15)
College--CSU Fullerton/UCI (2016-17)

While there's no such thing as a blank slate, I will try my best as a judge to leave debate for the debaters. That also means that I'm unwilling to do much work for you, if any all (of course this will be adjusted with skill level, which means I'll also be holding a higher standard for explanation at the open level of debate). Explain everything. Don't assume I know what you mean when you repeat some jargon, because there's no stasis or dictionary for anything in debate, so even if I'm familiar with your lit or argument, every debater means something slightly different when they say "ontology" or "perm." So tell me what you mean.

T - awesome. slow down. if the other team can't catch your tech I probably won't. have impacts.

FW - go for it. everything I said about T applies here. with that said, I have two more notes here: (1) Framework determines what I should view as important in the round, meaning everything in debate is about framework, even if it's not on a separate flow. Because I won't be doing much work for you, framework is thus the only measure I have for evaluating the round, making it a prior question. (2) If we're talking about the framework that goes on a separate flow, don't call it T. T is about having mutual ground to debate on for x, y, or z (even if it's not about the resolution). Framework concerns our orientation towards x (could be the resolution, a pedagogy, etc.)

DAs - cool. have internal links. don't out-tech the judge.

CP - great. as a 2a I probably have a slight bias against PICs. sorry. don't let that discourage you from running one.

Ks - The best advice I can give you here is assume I don't know your lit. Like I said above, even something as 'generic' as a cap K will be ran drastically different from round to round. The debaters are different, and so is the debate. Even if the lit is the same, your interpretation is probably different. This also means that if you do happen to 'botch up' the lit per my own interpretation, I'll try to evaluate the round based on the debaters' own arguments and readings of their lit, because no reading or argument is ever the same. My reading is not more valid or correct than yours. (Short of being blatantly racist, antiblack, or transphobic, you have to really mess up for me to think "yeah you're doing this wrong." But if it's clear that you're respecting the lit, I will try to abide by your interpretation.) With that said, this means I will have a high threshold for how you explain your lit to me based on YOUR own reading. Be specific. Case engagement will always grab my attention. Try to be explicit with your angle on the K - i.e. are you solving the aff? should we even care about the aff? etc.

Case - explain the aff. have overviews. I hate debates where I don't know what the 1ac does by the 2ar. even if you get my ballot, your speaks will probably suffer.

In general, don't be rude. Some people can handle it, some can't, so my thoughts on this will change from round to round. If the debate is really heated and everyone knows what they're doing, that's fine. Go all out. Have sass or whatever. But pls try to keep this activity enjoyable.

Full Judging Record

Tournament Date Ev Rd Aff Neg Vote Result
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/21/2019 TOCLD R6 Archbishop Mitty PK Marlborough ML Neg
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/21/2019 TOCLD R6 Flintridge Prep TV Marlborough HH Aff
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/21/2019 TOCLD R5 Marlborough AK Yerba Buena JG Aff
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/21/2019 TOCLD R4 Friendship YV Marlborough JS Neg
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/21/2019 TOCLD R4 San Marino EW Loyola BM Aff
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/21/2019 TOCLD R3 Sage Independent AA Marlborough CL Neg
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/21/2019 TOCLD R2 Marlborough LD Dougherty Valley KD Neg
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/21/2019 TOCLD R2 Lynbrook AM Marlborough ER Aff
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/21/2019 TOCLD R1 Torrey Pines AG Marlborough LK Aff
2019 Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/21/2019 TOCLD R1 Presentation IC Marlborough EY Neg
Loyola Invitational 9/7/2018 LD R6 Dougherty Valley DS Hamilton Independent AM Aff
Loyola Invitational 9/7/2018 LD R5 Sierra Canyon AR Arcadia ML Neg
Loyola Invitational 9/7/2018 LD R5 West Tech AW Palo Alto HS Independent EH Neg
Loyola Invitational 9/7/2018 LD R4 Marlborough JS San Marino VL Neg
Loyola Invitational 9/7/2018 LD R4 Dougherty Valley SP Quarry Lane ZD Neg
Peninsula Invitational 1/19/2018 LD R6 Westlake EE Marlborough ST Neg
Peninsula Invitational 1/19/2018 LD R5 Gabrielino HS (Independent) EH Flintridge Sacred Heart CB Neg
Peninsula Invitational 1/19/2018 LD R3 Northwood VA San Marino VL Neg
Peninsula Invitational 1/19/2018 LD R3 Notre Dame AB Los Osos Independent RN Aff
Peninsula Invitational 1/19/2018 LD R2 Mayfield Senior LB San Marino ED Neg
Peninsula Invitational 1/19/2018 LD R2 Yorba Linda Independent IV Valencia HS Independent CL Neg
Peninsula Invitational 1/19/2018 LD R1 Loyola JS Northwood SA Neg
Peninsula Invitational 1/19/2018 LD R1 Gabrielino HS (Independent) MC Perry (Independent) CM Neg
Las Vegas Classic Debate Tournament at UNLV 10/21/2017 Nov R5 CSU - Northridge SC Nevada Las Vegas FT Neg
Las Vegas Classic Debate Tournament at UNLV 10/21/2017 Nov R2 Southern Methodist LW San Francisco State LT Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 O CX Octo University HS, Irvine LL Chaminade CP AT Neg Neg on a 3-0
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 O CX R6 Canyon Crest GY Damien BG Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 O CX R5 Chaminade CP AB New Design Charter School-University Park PG Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 O CX R4 South East EM Alliance Stern Math and Science LS Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 JV CX R3 Rosemont NM CK McClatchy SP Neg
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 JV CX R2 CK McClatchy GB CHAMPS Charter CB Aff
Jack Howe Memorial Tournament 9/30/2017 JV CX R1 New Design Charter School-University Park ML CK McClatchy GW Aff
Bruschke Invitational at CSU Fullerton 4/14/2017 M PF Final Magnet NJ Nova 42 GS Neg Neg on a 2-1
Bruschke Invitational at CSU Fullerton 4/14/2017 O PF Semi Oxbridge Academy of the Palm Beaches RL Northwood MC Aff Aff on a 2-1
Bruschke Invitational at CSU Fullerton 4/14/2017 O LD R5 Nova 42 DK Woodbridge SS Aff
Bruschke Invitational at CSU Fullerton 4/14/2017 N PF R4 ACLA La Quinta NL Woodbridge KP Neg
Bruschke Invitational at CSU Fullerton 4/14/2017 O LD R3 Troy GH Elite of Irvine MJ Aff
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 O CX Semi Alliance Stern Math and Science SL Damien HJ Aff Aff on a 3-0
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 O CX Quar Alliance Stern Math and Science SL Harker LS Aff Aff on a 3-0
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 N LD R5 Flintridge Sacred Heart CB Academy of Higher Learning SS Neg
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 N LD R5 Academy of Higher Learning TC La Costa Canyon AM Aff
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 M LD R4 Academy of Higher Learning GZ Marlborough KS Aff
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 N LD R3 Northwood TL Los Osos RN Aff
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 N LD R3 San Marino EB East Bakersfield JE Aff
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 N LD R2 Yucaipa DC Granada Hills JD Neg
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 N LD R2 San Marino PB Harvard-Westlake JW Aff
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 N LD R1 Los Osos AO Loyola SC Aff
CSU Fullerton Middle and High School Invitational 10/14/2016 N LD R1 Granada Hills KL Oak Park HS Speech and Debate LP Neg